Cases

CONERY, Judge. hln a dispute over whether an accident occurred in the course arid scope of her employment in sales, the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) found in favor of the plaintiff-employee, Diana George (Ms. George) and against her employer, Cajun Outdoor Productions, L.L.C. (Cajun), and their workers’ compensation insurer, the Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Corporation (LWCC). For the following reasons, we affirm.<

OPINION LEWIS, Judge. This is an appeal by the defendant, Michael George Long, from that portion of the trial court’s judgment which awarded alimony in futuro to his former wife, Diana Sue Long, who was the plaintiff below. I. When the parties divorced in June of 1996, they had been married f

DIANA SUE LONG, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9701-CV-00003 v. ) ) Davidson Circuit MICHAEL GEORGE LONG, ) No. 93D-4318 ) Defendant/Appellant. )

POLEN, Judge, specially concurring. Diana E. George, n/k/a Diana E. Morgan, former wife, appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the former husband in post-judgment modification proceedings. The former wife raises three points on appeal: She claims that the trial court abused its discretion when it modified the visitation schedule, when it failed to strike the former husband’s production and testimony

WALDEN, Judge, dissenting. The marriage between Mr. and Mrs. George was dissolved in 1983, and Mrs. George was awarded custody of the two children, one born in 1979 and the other in 1980. In 1986 Mrs. George petitioned for an increase in child support and Mr. George counter-petitioned seeking shared parental responsibility and a set visitation schedule. In early 1987 the trial court granted the relief request

FREDERICKS HOMBERG WICKER, Judge. | j>Plaintiffs/Appellants, Diana Becnel, George Becnel, and Johnna Hurd appeal the trial court’s granting of Defendant/Ap-pellee Dr. Leanne Redman’s Exception of No Cause of Action, which dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims against her. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

MANION, Circuit Judge. On three separate occasions, Diana Hi-ghtshue was exposed to an industrial odorizer while working at DowBrands. On each occasion, she was taken to the emergency room and treated for breathing difficulties. After the third exposure, she resigned. Eight months later, she sought ERISA disability payments for being permanently and totally disabled. AIG Life In

In re Advocare International, L.P.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 77-420; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 14-C-303. Denied.

Theodobe Daohehhauseh, Jb., J. Petitioner, the mother of a ten-year-old physically handicapped child, seeks an order directing payment of her daughter’s tuition and maintenance at Cobb Memorial School, a private residential educational facility located in Altamont, New York, together with transportation costs, medical, dental and therapeutic treatment expenses. At the outset of the hearing, the attorneys for

Opinion issued August 3, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00815-CV ——————————— DIANA GORDON OFFORD, Appellant V. APRIL CARSON,

Opinion BARRY-DEAL, J. I. Summary We hold that in a child custody proceeding, if it appears that the minor may be an Indian child, the court must notify the tribe in question and must seek its determination of the child’s Indian status, which determination is conclusive for the purpose of deciding whether the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 applies. II. Statement of the

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1076 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1077 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

OPINION OF THE COURT MANSMANN, Circuit Judge. In this appeal we review the district court’s entry of a directed verdict, in a products liability action, on the question of whether the defendant was liable for the plaintiff’s injuries because of the defendant’s failure to equip its hydraulic press with a warning regarding a hazard of ejection of scrap met

Opinion filed August 3, 2023 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-21-00190-CV __________ JACY GATES, Appellant V. DENISE MCDONALD AND DIANA DOBBINS, Appellees On Appeal from the

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT KAJAINE CAPITAL, INC., and WORTH AVENUE CAPITAL II, LLC, Appellants, v. DIANA L. ABOUZEID, individually, DIANA L. ABOUZEID and ANDREW P. ABOUZEID, AS SUCCESSOR CO-TRUSTEES OF THE GEORGE A. ABOUZEID REVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 28,1992, AS AMENDED, ANAND PATEL, and 11927 MAIDSTONE DRIVE, LLC,

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation’s Petition for Rehearing is DENIED; and no member of this panel nor judge in active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, the Suggestion for Rehearing En Bane is also DENIED. However, we withdraw our prior opinion, Hirras v. National Railroad Passeng

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGGIE B-. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiff brings this action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), see 5 U.S.O. § 552, against the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), a component of the United States Department of the Treasury.1 This matter is before the Court on Defendants

MEAD, J. [¶ 1] Arnold A. Diana appeals from a judgment of conviction entered by the trial court (Hjelm, /.), and from the sentence it imposed, following a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder, 17-A M.R.S. § 201(1)(A) (2013). Diana contends that the court erred in (1) denying his motion to suppress the evidence resulting from three searches of his residence