Cases

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Maryland, Baltimore City denied.

187 B.R. 588 (1995) In re Richard W. SANDERS, Debtor. Richard W. SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. Diana LANFARE, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 94-3151. Related No. 94-32233. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. September 13, 1995. *589 *590 James M. Perlman, Toledo, OH, for plain

Opinion filed April 2, 2020 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-18-00051-CV __________ CITY OF ALBANY, Appellant V. DIANA CHRISTINE BLUE AND ELVA RAE SANDERS, Appellees On Appeal from the 259th District Court Sh

Ronayne Krause, J. *669 Plaintiff-appellant, the estate of Diana Lykos Voutsaras (the Estate) appeals as of right the trial court's order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants *811 </

James C. Mahan, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the court is plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company's *1117("plaintiff") motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 41). Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") filed a response (ECF No. 46), to which plaintiff replied (ECF No. 49). Also before the court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT FLETCHER LEE SANDERS, Appellant, v. ULYSSES PETERSON-SANDERS, Appellee. No. 4D20-2082 [May 26, 2021] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Dia

Sanders v Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. (2024 NY Slip Op 02264) Sanders v Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. 2024 NY Slip Op 02264 Decided on April 25, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-1545 Filed January 9, 2019 PELLA CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. DIANA G. WINN, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge. Pella Corporation appeals from the district court’s ruling on judicial review affirming the

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 18, 2015. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00418-CR No. 05-14-00419-CR DIANA FLORES PEINADO, Appellant

MEMORANDUM ** Michael Sanders appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the defendants violated his rights under the First Amendment, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUI-PA”), and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Shakur

MEMORANDUM ** Michael Sanders appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the defendants violated his rights under the First Amendment, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUI-PA”), and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Shakur

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 18, 2015. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00418-CR No. 05-14-00419-CR DIANA FLORES PEINADO, Appellant

SUMMARY ORDER On October 2, 2001, the plaintiff, Mildred Martinez, was dismissed from her job as a housing specialist in the office of the defendant, then-New York State Assemblyman Steven Sanders. Ms. Martinez asserts that she was dismissed because of her support for Fernando Ferrer, a candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for Mayor of New York. Assemblyman Sanders was supporting a different candidate for the Democratic Party n

SUMMARY ORDER On October 2, 2001, the plaintiff, Mildred Martinez, was dismissed from her job as a housing specialist in the office of the defendant, then-New York State Assemblyman Steven Sanders. Ms. Martinez asserts that she was dismissed because of her support for Fernando Ferrer, a candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for Mayor of New York. Assemblyman Sanders was supporting a different candidate for the Democratic Party n

355 Argued and submitted September 19, 2019; decision of Court of Appeals affirmed, judgment of circuit court affirmed in part and reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings April 23, 2020 PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Respondent on Review, v. Jason SANDERS, Petitioner on Review. (SC S066455) P

Justice GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court. These cases concern the efforts of Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) to cope with a complex problem: air pollution emitted in one State, but causing harm in other States. Left unregulated, the emitting or upwind State reaps the benefits of the economic activity causing the pollution without bearing all

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2014 DORIS RICH CORYA, as Trustee of the Sanders Trust, DORIS RICH CORYA and PAUL J. RICH SANDERS as Trustee of the Eleanor M. Rich Trust, DORIS RICH CORYA as Trustee of the John P. Corya Irrevocable Trust, and DORIS RICH CORYA as Trustee of the John P. Corya Revocable Trust, Appellants,

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DORIS RICH CORYA, as Trustee of the Sanders Trust, DORIS RICH CORYA and PAUL J. RICH SANDERS as Trustee of the Eleanor M. Rich Trust, DORIS RICH CORYA as Trustee of the John P. Corya Irrevocable Trust, and DORIS RICH CORYA as Trustee of the John P. Corya Revocable Trust, Appellants, v.

[Cite as State v. Sanders-Frye, 2012-Ohio-934.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97443 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.