Cases

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Carolyn Diane Dendy and William Leroy Dendy, Respondents, v. Ajia Latrice Gamble, Alexia Gamble, and John Rice, Defendants, Of whom Ajia Latrice Gamble and John Rice are the Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2023-001358 Appeal From Richland County Joseph

CANADY, J., dissenting. Although I agree with the majority’s answer regarding the second certified question, I disagree with its conclusion concerning the first certified question. For the reasons I have expressed in my dissent in Haygood v. State, 109 So.3d 735 (Fla.2013), I conclude that the jury pardon doctrine should be repudiated. Since the majority’s conclusion that Williams is entitled to a new t

MEMORANDUM OPINION THEODORE D. CHUANG, District Judge. Plaintiffs Norman Williams (“Williams”), Diane Howe (“Howe”), Kevin Attaway (“Attaway”). and Jamel Blakeley (“Blake-ley”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) assert various causes of action against Defendant Ro-marm S.A. (“Romarm”) arising from two shootings, during which the firing of an assault weapon marketed and sold by Ro-marm resulted in the death of the

Opinion IKOLA, J. Diane Larson appeals from the court’s order appointing the public administrator to administer the estate of the deceased father of Larson’s two children, who are decedent’s sole heirs. We reverse because Probate Code section 8464 did not authorize the court to make such an appointment.1 FACTS On April 1, 2009, Larson petiti

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Dorian Williams appeals from his conviction and sentence for conveying false information about bombing a commercial aircraft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 35(b) and conveying a threat and false information in interstate commerce about the destruction of life and property by explosives under 18 U.S.C. § 844(e). Williams challenges the constitutionality of the s

[J-31A&B-2018] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. LORA JEAN WILLIAMS; GREGORY J. : Nos. 2 & 3 EAP 2018 SMITH; CVP MANAGEMENT, INC. D/B/A : OR T/A CITY VIEW PIZZA; JOHN'S : Appeal from the Order of the ROAST PORK, INC. F/K/A JOHN'S : Commonwealth Court entered on ROAST PORK; METRO BEVERAGE OF : 6/1

WHIPPLE, C.J. *209Plaintiff, Ken Haydel, appeals a judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, CB & I, Inc., CB & I, Inc. of Texas, and Chicago Bridge and Iron Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as "CB & I"), and dismissing with prejudice his claims against these defendants. For the fol

OPINION HILLMAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court: by way of Plaintiffs’ motion [Doc. No. 89] to remand this case to the Superior Court of New Jersey for Camden County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Defendants oppose Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. The Court has considered the parties’ submissions, and decides this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 153 [¶ 1] After trial, a jury convicted appellant, Betty Jean Williams (appellant), of five counts of forgery. We affirm. ISSUES [¶ 2] Appellant sets forth three issues on appeal as follows: I. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in allo

HUG, Circuit Judge: Appellant Diane Williams (“Williams”) appeals the Tax Court’s dismissal of her petition for redetermination of a deficiency in income tax. The dismissal was based upon a finding by the Tax Court that the petition was untimely and, therefore, the Tax Court had no jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482. There is

{¶ 53} I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority. {¶ 54} The United States Supreme Court in Atkins, as well as the Ohio Supreme Court in Lott, have acknowledged that executing mentally retarded individuals violates the Federal and Ohio prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment. {¶ 55} The Ohio Supreme Court has fashioned a method for retroactively hearing these appeals i

172 F.Supp.2d 813 (2001) In the MATTER OF Diane SELF, wife of and William Self as Owners of Aluminum Hull Skeeter Motor Vessel, Hull Identification No. STE22499E898, Praying for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability Civil Action No. 01-0758. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Alexandria Division. October 10, 2001. *814 E

675 A.2d 1037 (1996) 110 Md. App. 1 Paul Andrew WILLIAMS v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1334, Sept. Term, 1995. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 7, 1996. *1040 Deanna L. Zakes (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender and John L. Kopolow, Asst. Public Defender, on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellant.

155 P.3d 761 (2007) 2007-NMCA-036 STATE of NEW MEXICO, ex rel. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, County of SAN MIGUEL; and New Mexico Association of Counties, a New Mexico nonprofit corporation, Petitioners-Appellees. v. Joe R. WILLIAMS, Secretary of the New Mexico Corrections Department; Charlene Knipfing, Director of the Probation and Parole Division, State of New Mexico Parole Board, a/k/a Board of Probation and Parole, a/

ISHEE, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Diane Forrest appeals pro se challenging an order issued by the Adams County Chancery Court regarding the closing of her late husband’s estate. Due to Diane’s failure to cite'any authority in her appeal, we are faced with a procedural bar. Therefore, we affirm the chancery court’s order. STATEMENT OF FA

574 N.E.2d 62 (1991) 214 Ill. App.3d 499 158 Ill.Dec. 268 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Diane WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-88-0333. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. May 15, 1991. *63 State Appellate Defender by Debra

149 F.Supp.2d 398 (2001) LABOR READY, INC., a Washington corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Labor Ready Midwest, Inc., a Washington corporation Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAMS STAFFING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation, d/b/a Staffing Network, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Antwan K. Patton, John Nargan, Ray Castro, Frank McCumber, and James Schlicker, Defendants. No. 00 C 470. United S

32 F.Supp.2d 236 (1998) Ernest WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, et al., Defendants. Stephanie Wimbs and Dorothy Wimbs, Plaintiffs, v. SGT. J.A. Kearney, Deputy Sheriff of Allegheny County, et al., Nos. CIV. A. 96-560, CIV. A. 98-229. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. December 29, 1998. James W. Carroll, Jr., Tabakin, Ca

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00135-CR John Williams, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 421ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2008-029, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00135-CR John Williams, Appellant v.