Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-01011-COA LISA DIANN CREW APPELLANT/ CROSS-APPELLEE v. SIDNEY ELLIS TILLOTSON JR. APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLANT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/21/

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-01011-COA LISA DIANN CREW APPELLANT/ CROSS-APPELLEE v. SIDNEY ELLIS TILLOTSON JR. APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLANT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/21/

OPINION DAVID W. HOUSTON, III, Bankruptcy Judge. On consideration before the court is the first interim application of BDO Seidman, LLP, for compensation for services rendered and reimbursement of expenses as accountants for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (“the Committee”); an the objection thereto filed by the United States Trustee for Region V; and the court, having considered

Chambers, J.* ¶1 Dorothy Halstien, an aging woman suffering from dementia, owned a home worth somewhere between $235,000 and $320,000. At about the time she developed dementia, she owed approximately $75,000 to Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu), secured by a deed of trust on her home. Because of the cost of her care, her guardian did not have the funds to pay her mortgage and Quality Loan Service Corpora

859 P.2d 217 (1992) SOUTH WASHINGTON ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy J. FLANAGAN, Cynthia L. Reed, Sanford F. Myers, Daniel M. Fowler, and Thomas A. Wilbanks, Defendants-Appellees. David J. OLIVET, Timothy J. Flanagan, Cynthia L. Reed, Sanford F. Myers, Daniel M. Fowler, and Thomas A. Wilbanks, Third-Party Plaintiffs and Cross-Appellants, v. Harry J. BEDROSSIAN, Geraldine Bedrossian, Rober

792 F.Supp.2d 861 (2011) Diann B. JAMES, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON, et. al., Defendants. Case No. 09-CV-02136(AW). United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. June 20, 2011. *863 Cynthia Goode Works, Law Offices of Cynthia Goode Works, Largo, MD, Lisa Alexis Jones, Lisa Alexis Jones PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plainti

NO. 07-09-0107-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D DECEMBER 8, 2009 ______________________________

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered July 22, 2003, denying defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 1021 to dismiss the complaint and for related relief, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Plaintiff, now deceased, commenced this action on or about December 18, 1995 to recover for

713 F.Supp.2d 6 (2010) Valda R. CROWDER, Plaintiff, v. BIERMAN, GEESING, AND WARD LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-0104 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 20, 2010. *7 Valda R. Crowder Poughkeepsie, NY, pro se. Rachael Victoria Morgan Abramson, Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC, Bethe

429 B.R. 387 (2010) In Re Elliotte Patrick COLEMAN, Debtor. Elliotte Patrick Coleman, Appellant, v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Appellee. Civil Action No. 09-1592 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 2, 2010. *388 Elliotte Patrick Coleman, Washington, DC, pro se. Dianne M. Keppler, Hunton &

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPLICATION OF WASHINGTON LAW MARSHA J. PECHMAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motions for application of Wash*548ington law and for class certification. (Dkt. Nos. 60 & 65.) Defendant filed responses to both motions

643 F.Supp.2d 201 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. SOUTHERN UNION COMPANY. Cr. No. 07-134 S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. July 22, 2009. *205 Terrence P. Donnelly, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Providence, RI, Dianne Chabot, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Boston, MA, Kevin Cassi

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 12, 2014 ANTHONY WILLIAMS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2004C1867 Seth W. Norman, Judge No. M2013-00862-CCA-R3-PC - Filed March 13, 2014 A Davidson County jury convicted the Petitioner, Anthony Williams, of first degree pre

Talmadge, J.* (dissenting) — Washington’s Industrial Insurance Act (Act) was first enacted in 1911. Despite the millions of claims presented by injured workers in Washington to the Department of Labor and Industries (Department), the hundreds of thousands of cases heard by the *824Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (Board), and the thousands

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Plaintiff Mohammad Javad Hajjar-Nejad (“Hajjar-Nejad”) brings this action against The George Washington University (“GW”), principally challenging his dismissal as a medical student from GW’s School of Medicine and Health Sciences (the “Medical School”) in July 2007. In the short time that

¶1 As part of a master planned resort near Mt. Rainier, the Park Junction Partners (PJP) pro*674posed to build a lodge with an adjoining conference center. Under the Pierce County Code (PCC), the hearing examiner determined that the conference center was not a “[c]overed structure!] whose primary occupancy is public assembly, with a capacity of greater than 300 persons” and thus was permitted unde

39 A.3d 1281 (2012) BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, Appellant, v. Dianne BUGGS, et al., Appellees. No. 11-CV-96. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued December 13, 2011. Decided March 22, 2012. *1282 Michael J. Quartarone, Washington, DC, for appellant. John C. Keeney, with whom Wendy J. Weinberg was

983 P.2d 1155 (1999) UNIGARD INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, and Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington corporation, Appellants, v. Bruce LEVEN, individually; Respondent, Bayside Waste & Hauling, Inc., a Washington corporation; Liquid Waste Disposal Company/Lidco, Inc., a Washington corporation; Northwest Garbage, Inc., a Washington corporation; and Rainier Disposal Company, Inc., a Washington corporation; and Sno-K

PER CURIAM: After oral argument and careful consideration, we readily conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. For the reasons discussed at oral argument, we conclude that the notice of the class action settlement amply satisfied the requirements of due process. We also conclude that Dr. Cook failed to preserve in the district court his argument that some of his claims were not “finally adjudic

533 F.Supp.2d 144 (2008) Dr. Hoda ELEMARY, pro se, Plaintiff, v. PHILIPP HOLZMANN A.G., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-654 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 6, 2008. *145 *146 *147 Hoda Elemary, Laguna Niguel, CA,