Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Diaz v. Johns”
Diaz v. Diazpublic domain
*659 Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (John B. Collins, J.), dated September 10, 2013. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, awarded the plaintiff $2,303 per month in child support and $500 per month in maintenance for four years, adjudicated the defendant in contempt upon a finding that he violated a pendente
Kasinsky v. Diazpublic domain
Affirmed.
Kasinsky v. Diazpublic domain
Affirmed.
Yun v. Diazpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Kasinsky v. Diazpublic domain
Affirmed.
Diaz Ortiz v. Smithpublic domain
Hon. Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Petitioner Cristian Diaz Ortiz, an undocumented alien born in El Salvador with no criminal record, has been in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") custody since August 20, 2018. ICE is detaining him pursuant to 8
Diaz v. Devlinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE Nature of the Case Plaintiffs, Marianne Diaz (“Diaz”), individually and as mother and next friend of two minor children (individually (“Ml” and “M2” and collectively, the “minor children”), Bryant Alequin (“Alequin”) and Joshua Matos (“Matos”) have filed suit against the City of Worcester (“City”) and individual Defendants Sergean
Diaz v. Bullockpublic domain
OPINION John Michael Vazquez, U.S.D.J. This matter concerns the arrest of the wrong person, Plaintiff, by New Jersey *644police officers in response to. an outstanding Maryland warrant. This Opinion addresses motions for summary judgment filed by (1) South Plainfield Police Officer Mark Bullock and Lieutenant Peter Aran-do (the “Officer Defendants”
Diaz v. Kerestespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Scates v. Johnspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Michael Scates, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly
Franklin v. Johnspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Franklin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reve
Diaz-Villanueva v. Sessionspublic domain
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON: * Denis Alexis Diaz-Villanueva petitions for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. On *308appeal, Diaz-Villanueva argues that he sufficiently established eligibility for asylum.1
Diaz v. Arizonapublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Joseph Diaz and Luis Campas brought a 20-count, 51-page complaint against a dozen defendants. Diaz and Campas claim that one defendant wrote them a bad check, and that when they tried to have that defendant prosecuted, the other defendants retaliated against them by, among other things, taking away their boxing licenses. (Diaz is a trainer and Cam-pas a boxer.) The district court granted the
State v. Solis-Diazpublic domain
Per Curiam ¶1 Guadalupe Solis-Diaz Jr. seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision vacating his sentence a sec*537ond time and remanding for resentencing but declining to disqualify the sentencing judge. State v. Solis-Diaz, 194 Wn. App. 129, 376 P.3d 458 (2016). We grant review and reverse to the extent the Court of Appeals declined to disqualify the sentencing
Figueroa v. Diazpublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants John C. Guinn, Jr., and T.J’s Car Service, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silber, J.), dated October 6, 2011, as, upon renewal and reargument, in effect, adhered to the original determination in an order of the same court dated June 30, 2010, denying that branch of their cross motion which was for summary judgment di
PER CURIAM. Petitioners Raymond and Surey Diaz (collectively “Diaz”) seek certiorari review 1 of an order abating their action against Florida Peninsula Insurance Company (“FPIC”) for breach of contract and declaratory judgment. We find that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in granting an
Figueroa v. Diazpublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants John C. Guinn, Jr., and T.J’s Car Service, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silber, J.), dated October 6, 2011, as, upon renewal and reargument, in effect, adhered to the original determination in an order of the same court dated June 30, 2010, denying that branch of their cross motion which was for summary judgment di
Diaz v. Commissioner of Correctionpublic domain
KELLER, J. The petitioner, Luis Diaz, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. First, the petitioner claims that the court abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal because his right to due process and a fair trial were violat
Deas v. Diazpublic domain
The petition by the defendant Transportation General, Inc., doing business as Metro Taxi, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn. App. 146 (AC 33030), is denied.
State of Arizona v. Nunez-Diazpublic domain
CHIEF JUSTICE BALES, opinion of the Court: ¶1 In this case involving post-conviction relief, the State argues that the lower courts erred in concluding that Hector Sebastion Nunez-Diaz, an undocumented immigrant, received ineffective assistance of counsel when he entered a guilty plea resulting in his mandatory deportation. The State contends that because Nunez-Diaz was deportable wit