Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CONNIE DIETRICH, an individual, No. 19-56409 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:19-cv-04291- JAK-PJW THE BOEING COMPANY, improperly denominated as The Boeing Company, individually and as OPINION successor by merger to McDonnell Douglas Corporation

Memorandum Opinion and Order LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge. Before the Court is the motion of defendants Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Morgan Stanley, David R. Warren, Anthony B. Tufariello, William J. Forsell, and Steven S. Stern (together, “Defendants”) for reconsideration, in light of the Second Circuit’s

OPINION OF THE COURT Martin B. Stecher, J. Defendant Chemical Bank moves to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that documentary evidence, read in conjunction with the controlling statutes, provides a complete defense to the action. The motion is granted. Plaintiff has commenced a class action, apparently uncertified as yet, alleging that certain service charges customarily impos

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Vekuii Rukoro, Johannes Isaack, The Association of the Ovaherero Genocide in the USA Inc., and Barnabas Veraa Katuuo bring this putative class action on behalf of members and descendants of the Ovaherero and Nama indigenous peoples against the Federal Republic of Germany ("Germany") for damages, declaratory, and other equitable relief arising from the genocide of thousands

SUMMARY ORDER Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum, Judge). UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED. The plaintiffs brought the instant lawsuit against the defendants for, inter alia, trademark infringement.

652 F.2d 654 Leroy McCOY and Ladie Byrd Crawford, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Arthur B. GOLDSTON, Jr., Richard Papciak and the City ofDetroit PoliceDepartment, Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-1102. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Oct. 20, 1980.Decided June 26, 1981. John C. Kaplansky, Sou

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1690 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, as Representative for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, as Representative for the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, as Representative for the Employees Retirement

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1351 Doc: 70 Filed: 01/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1351 MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INC.; FIELD TRADERS LLC; CINDY’S HOT SHOTS, INC.; PASADENA ARMS, LLC; WORTH-A-SHOT, INC.,

701 F.Supp.2d 263 (2010) Nicholas GALLELLI, an infant by and through his Parents and Natural Guardians, Marc Gallelli and Linda Gallelli and Marc Gallelli and Linda Gallelli, Individually, v. CROWN IMPORTS, LLC, Grupo Modelo, S.A, de C.V. aka G Modelo Corporation, Barton Brands, Ltd., and Barton Beers, Ltd., Defendants. No. CV-08-3372. United States District Court, E.D. New York.

502 F.Supp.2d 1124 (2007) Tim and Penny PATERSON, Plaintiffs, v. LITTLE, BROWN AND COMPANY, Time Warner Book Group, Harold Evans Associates LLC, Harold Evans, and David Lefer, Defendants. No. C05-1719Z. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. July 25, 2007. *1125 *1126 D. Mi

Hatch, J. The complaint is for meat sold defendant on account and demanded judgment for $154.18. Accompanying the complaint is a verified bill of particulars, filed by plaintiff, which sets out items of the account commencing May 13, 1887, and ending June 21st in the same year, amounting in the aggregate to the sum of $270.74. Commencing with May 31, 1887, and ending on J une 21st, same year, defendant was credited with four ite

Opinion BAXTER, J. Here we consider issues concerning the application of Penal Code section 861. This statute requires dismissal of a criminal complaint if the preliminary examination is not completed in “one session . . . , unless the magistrate, for good cause shown by affidavit, postpones it.” {Ibid., italics added.)1

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

18‐3226 (L) In re del Valle Ruiz In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2018 Argued: March 25, 2019 Decided: October 7, 2019 Docket Nos. 18‐3226 (L), 18‐3474 (Con), 18‐3629 (XAP)

BELL, C.J., dissents which GREENE, J., joins in Parts C and D only. APPENDIX PROCEDURAL HISTORY OF STATE v. EVANS It is rare that we attach an Appendix to an Opinion. In most instances when we do so, it is for convenience—to display a plat, diagram, or other pictorial document as a

United Home Life Insurance Company, Inc. ("UHL") was granted judgment, after a bench trial, against Bellbrook Community Bank in the amount of $1,200, and costs. The bank appeals. We affirm. The bank presents its single assignment of error as follows: "The court erred in granting judgment to plaintiff pursuant to § 1303.55 (C) O.R.C. "A. The judgment is not supported by law or facts herein. "B. Defendant Appellant was

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KAREN STROMBERG; SAMUEL No. 19-15159 ROECKER; THOMAS LAMMEL; MARY GALLOWAY; DANIELLE LAGRAVE; D.C. No. THOMAS MCMAHON; BOARDSPORTS 5:17-md-02773- SCHOOL LLC; PATRICK BENAD; LHK LINDSEY CARR; RENEE ACOSTA; PATRICIA BURNESS; CAROL HARRIS; ROBERT LINKS; NICHELLE LYONS; OPINION NUALA VIGNOLES; RACHEL L. MILLER; JOHN WILLIAM KIEFER III; MATTHEW MITCHELL; SUSAN

MEMORANDUM DECISION THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge. Two bondholders, the Halfonds, seek the removal of the trustees and their counsel and the creditors’ committees and their counsel, and to surcharge these persons for fees and expense reimbursement they have received. The motion also seeks delay in the submission of the trustees’ plan to the creditors for their vote. (C.P.No.2488) This motion was filed

OPINION PARSONS, Vice Chancellor. This action is before me on a motion for summary judgment relating to a dispute between a Netherlands holding company, which controls one of the largest electronics companies in the world, and an Italian businessman, who is the managing shareholder and founder of a large television manufacturing and sales company in Italy. The holding company is a particip

*202MEMORANDUM & ORDER ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Purchasers of common shares of the financial services corporation EZCORP, Inc. (“EZCorp”) bring a class action complaint for securities fraud. They accuse EZCorp’s senior executives and sole shareholder of voting stock, Phillip Ean Cohen, of artific