⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Dignity Health v. Blue Cross of California”

California Court of Appeal · 2025-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 6/2/25; certified for publication 6/24/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR JOANNE ALLISON et al., A169225 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (City and County of San Francisco DIGNITY HEALTH, S
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-11-17 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PATRICIA PRITCHARD, as parent No. 23-4331 on behalf of minor C.P.; NOLLE D.C. No. PRITCHARD, as parent on behalf of 3:20-cv-06145- minor C.P.; S.R.; R.L., as parent on RJB behalf of minor S.L.; EMMETT JONES, Plaintiffs - Appellees, OPIN
California Court of Appeal · 2020-01-09 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 1/9/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE DIGNITY HEALTH et al., B288886 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC583522) v. LOCAL INITIATIVE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Defendant and Respondent. APP
United States District Court · 2018-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 340 F. Supp. 3d 862
ROBERTO A. LANGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant James Blue Jr. is charged with the aggravated sexual abuse of two children, CB and WWK. Doc. 1. According to Blue, the government intends to offer evidence under Rule 413 of the Federal Rules of Evidence that AM also made sexual assault allegations against Blue. Blue filed a motion seeking the following: 1) counseling records for CB from Capital Area Counseling as well as all
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-05-20 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-285V Originally Filed: March 11, 2022 Refiled in Redacted Form: May 20, 2022 PUBLISHED Special Master Horner SHAWN ORGEL-OLSON,
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984-06-22 · Published · cited 13× · 589 F. Supp. 1483; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15647
589 F.Supp. 1483 (1984) BLUE CROSS OF RHODE ISLAND and Blue Shield of Rhode Island, Plaintiffs, v. Joseph E. CANNON, in his capacity as Director of the Department of Health for the State of Rhode Island, and William Carroll, in his capacity as Director of the Department of Business Regulation for the State of Rhode Island, Defendants, Ocean State Master Health Plan, Inc., Defendant/Intervenor. Civ. A. No. 83-0772 S.
California Court of Appeal · 2022-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/27/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE 2009 METROPOULOS FAMILY D078790 TRUST et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. v. 37-2020-00011877-CU-MC-CTL) CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD,
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2017-10-18 · Published · cited 8× · 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 446; 16 Cal. App. 5th 553; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 922
HUFFMAN, J. *556Plaintiff and appellant Paul Kendall's second amended complaint asserts several types of class-wide claims that challenge the billing and collection practices of the health facility operating an emergency room *557where he received care, de
California Court of Appeal · 2017-10-23 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 10/18/17; Certified for Publication 10/23/17 (order attached) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PAUL KENDALL, D070390 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2013-00073680-
Supreme Court of the United States · 2022-06-24 · Published · cited 503× · 597 U.S. 215; 213 L. Ed. 2d 545; 142 S. Ct. 2228
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Sidibe v. Healthpublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2014-06-20 · Published · cited 1× · 51 F. Supp. 3d 870; 2014 WL 2859206; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84589
[Re: ECF No. 70] ORDER GRANTING SUTTER HEALTH’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, Plaintiffs Djeneba Sidibe, Diane Dewey, and Jerry Jankowski sued Sutter Health, a company that owns and operates hospitals and other health care service providers, alleging that Sut
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-08-04 · Published · cited 45× · 867 F.3d 338; 2017 WL 3324690; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14361
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 16-1275 _____________ REAL ALTERNATIVES, INC.; KEVIN I. BAGATTA, ESQ.; THOMAS A. LANG, ESQ.; CLIFFORD W. MCKEOWN, Appellants v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; SECRETARY UNITED
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011-08-12 · Published · cited 33× · 648 F.3d 1235; 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1649; 108 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5728; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16806; 2011 WL 3519178
DUBINA, Chief Judge, and HULL, Circuit Judge: Soon after Congress passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub.L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), amended by Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (“HCERA”), Pub.L. No. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029 (2010) (the “Act”), the plaintiffs brought this action challenging the Act’s constitutionality. The plaintiffs are 26 states, private individual
Supreme Court of Florida · 2003-07-10 · Published · cited 99× · 866 So. 2d 612; 2003 WL 21546546
866 So.2d 612 (2003) NORTH FLORIDA WOMEN'S HEALTH AND COUNSELING SERVICES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, et al., Respondents. No. SC01-843. Supreme Court of Florida. July 10, 2003. *614 Richard E. Johnson, Tallahassee, FL; Bebe J. Anderson, Julie Rikelman, and Jody Ratner, The Center for Reproductive Law & P
California Court of Appeal · 2025-02-19 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 2/19/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA JASON Y. LIN, D084821 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVSB2313160) BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PRIMECARE MEDICAL NETWORK, INC., Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991-04-10 · Published · cited 62× · 925 F.2d 1555
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Judith Nelson and Darci Anne Bowman brought suit against defendant Monroe Clinic, alleging constitutional, antitrust, and state-law tort claims arising from defendant’s refusal to continue to treat them. The district court dismissed all but the antitrust claims for failure to state a claim. Following the close of discovery, the district court granted summary judgment to defendant on the ant
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004-06-01 · Published · cited 26× · 320 F. Supp. 2d 378; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10777; 2004 WL 1303650
320 F.Supp.2d 378 (2004) Carolyn DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. DURHAM MENTAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SUBSTANCE ABUSE AREA AUTHORITY, d.b.a. and a.k.a. The Durham Mental Health Center, et al., Defendants. No. 1:03 CV 273. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. June 1, 2004. *379 *380
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001-11-08 · Published · cited 14× · 171 F. Supp. 2d 1323; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19775; 2001 WL 1480549
171 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2001) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. James F. ALDERSON, Plaintiff, v. QUORUM HEALTH GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 8:99-CV-413-T-23TGW. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. November 8, 2001. *1324 Jay G. Trezevant, U.S. Attorney's Office, Tampa, FL, Joyce R. Branda, Arnold M. Aue
Washington Supreme Court · 2024-06-20 · Published · cited 0×
FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON JUNE 20, 2024 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON JUNE 20, 2024 ERIN L. LENNON
California Court of Appeal · 2025-02-25 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 2/25/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Siskiyou) ---- SISKIYOU HOSPITAL, INC., C097671, C098311 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. SCCV-CVPT-