⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Discover Bank v. Paradis”

Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2021-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
The Supreme Court of South Carolina Leisel Paradis, Petitioner, v. Charleston County School District, James Island Charter High School, Robert Bohnstengel and Stephanie Spann, in their individual capacities, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2018-002025 ORDER After careful consideration of the petition for rehearing, the Court is unable to discover that any material f
State v. Paradispublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005-09-27 · Published · cited 6× · 881 A.2d 530; 91 Conn. App. 595; 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 419
881 A.2d 530 (2005) 91 Conn.App. 595 STATE of Connecticut v. Victor PARADIS. No. 24194. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued February 23, 2005. Decided September 27, 2005. *531 Nicholas P. Cardwell, Hartford, for the appellant (defendant). Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state'
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992-08-18 · Published · cited 9× · 796 F. Supp. 59; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12934; 1992 WL 201299
796 F.Supp. 59 (1992) Maurice C. PARADIS, as Receiver for Heritage Loan & Investment Company, Plaintiff, v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 91-0606L. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. August 18, 1992. *60 Steven E. Snow, Randall L. Souza, Partridge, Snow & Hahn, Providence, R.I., f
Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1996-03-01 · Published · cited 0×
DECISION This case is before the Court on Claimants' appeal from the decision of the Special Master holding that the claimed funds are not entitled to priority payment as a deposit with Heritage Loan and Investment Company ("Heritage"). The Claimants appeal pursuant to Administrative Order No. 94-12, which requires that this Court provide a de novo review of the claim here at issue. The Receiver opposes the appeal. I The events lea
Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007-10-05 · Published · cited 1× · 182 Vt. 428; 2007 Vt. 110; 940 A.2d 700; 2007 VT 110; 2007 Vt. LEXIS 255
Dooley, J. ¶ 1. In this judgment-lien-foreclosure action, the plaintiffs, Jeffrey and Rebecca Lively, challenge a decision of the *429superior court, granting summary judgment to defendant, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS). The court concluded that plaintiffs had failed to perfect their judgment lien against debtor, Kenneth Bayley, because the court
Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 182 Vt. 428; 2007 Vt. 110
2007 VT 110 Lively v. Northfield Savings Bank (2007-165) 2007 VT 110 [Filed 05-Oct-2007] NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-03-23 · Published · cited 40× · 778 F. Supp. 2d 375; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31362; 2011 WL 1210208
778 F.Supp.2d 375 (2011) BNP PARIBAS MORTGAGE CORPORATION and BNP Paribas, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. Deutsche Bank AG, Plaintiff, v. Bank of America, N.A., Defendant. Nos. 09 Civ. 9783 (RWS), 09 Civ. 9784 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 23, 2011. *380 Boies Schiller &am;
District Court, S.D. California · 2018-03-19 · Published · cited 19× · 297 F. Supp. 3d 1107
HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS, United States District Judge Plaintiff Catherine Bryan, proceeding pro se , filed her complaint, bringing civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(w), and 1986 ; Elder Financial Abuse claims under
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-06-28 · Published · cited 2× · 174 N.E.3d 940; 2021 Ohio 2178
[Cite as Paradie v. Turning Point Builders, Inc., 2021-Ohio-2178.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY TERRANCE PARADIE, CASE NO. 2020-L-046 Plaintiff-Appellee, Civil Appeal from the -v- Court of Common P
People v. Williamspublic domain
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012-10-11 · Published · cited 18× · 297 P.3d 1011; 2012 COA 165; 2012 Colo. App. LEXIS 1648; 2012 WL 4829492
Opinion by Judge FOX. {1 Defendant, Tyrone Maurice Williams, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first degree felony murder and three counts of aggravated robbery. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and vacate the sentence in part. I. Background 12 J.T. and his wife, A.T., were at their Denver tattoo shop when two men ca
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 348 Conn. 796
Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL April 16, 2024 796 APRIL, 2024 348 Conn. 796 Mercedes-Benz Financial v. 1188 Stratford Avenue, LLC MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL v. 1188 STRATFORD AVENUE, LLC, ET AL. (SC 20754) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-03-24 · Published · cited 5× · 618 F. Supp. 2d 276; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30457; 2009 WL 812046
618 F.Supp.2d 276 (2009) Joshua G. FENSTERSTOCK, Plaintiff, v. EDUCATION FINANCE PARTNERS and Affiliated Computer Services, Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 3622 (TPG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 24, 2009. *277 Alan Edward Sash, McLaughlin and Stern, LLP, Karin Elizabeth Fisch, Orin Robert Kurtz, Abbey Spanier Rodd
Dowling v. Salewskipublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007-06-28 · Published · cited 11× · 2007 ME 78; 926 A.2d 193; 2007 Me. LEXIS 78
926 A.2d 193 (2007) 2007 ME 78 Tim DOWLING et al. v. Richard SALEWSKI. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: May 22, 2007. Decided: June 28, 2007. *194 Verne E. Paradie Jr., Esq. (orally), Trafton & Matzen, LLP, Auburn, for plaintiff. Philip P. Mancini, Esq. Nathaniel R. Huckel-Bauer, Esq. (o
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2023-07-05 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Beales, Fulton and Lorish Argued at Fredericksburg, Virginia RENEE MICHELLE PARADY OPINION BY v. Record No. 0744-22-4 JUDGE LISA M. LORISH JULY 5
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020-03-27 · Published · cited 4× · 954 F.3d 315
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 18-1277 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MICHAEL GORDON, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
Motes v. PacifiCorppublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009-09-09 · Published · cited 5× · 217 P.3d 1072; 230 Or. App. 701; 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1359
217 P.3d 1072 (2009) 230 Or. App. 701 James Cliff MOTES and Barbara Motes, husband and wife, individually and as trustees of the James Cliff Motes and Barbara Motes Joint Living Trust, dated 12/31/2004, Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Respondents, v. PACIFICORP, an Oregon corporation, Defendant-Respondent Cross-Appellant, and Farleigh Wada & Witt PC, an Oregon professional corporation; Kimberley Hanks McGair; and Teres
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022-11-17 · Published · cited 9× · 53 F.4th 739
21-1669 Badar v. Swissport USA, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2022 (Argued: September 29, 2022; Decided: November 17, 2022) Docket No. 21-1669 ____________________ CHAUDHRY BADAR, ALIA DAVARIAR, MUHAMMAD S HAFQAT, BA
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019-07-31 · Published · cited 12× · 931 F.3d 134
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Sandy Hernandez-Mieses appeals from the district court's partial denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his home on the day of his arrest on drug and money laundering charges in Cataño, Puerto Rico. Specifically, he challenges the district court's conclusion that federal law enforcement agents validly relied on exceptions to the warrant requirement w
Blandino v. Fischelpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002-01-30 · Published · cited 9× · 39 P.3d 258; 179 Or. App. 185; 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 134
39 P.3d 258 (2002) 179 Or. App. 185 Anthony J. BLANDINO, Appellant, and William McIlvaine, D.C., Plaintiff, v. Robert FISCHEL, D.C., and James Chaney, Respondents. 98-1335L2; A108548 Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted June 18, 2001. Decided January 30, 2002. *259 David C.
Warne v. Hallpublic domain
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016-06-27 · Published · cited 1151× · 2016 CO 50; 373 P.3d 588; 2016 WL 3574391
1 Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the 2 public and can be accessed through the Judicial Branch’s homepage at 3 http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the 4 Colorado Bar Association’s homepage at http://www.cobar.org. 5 6 ADVANCE SHEET HEADNOTE 7 June 27, 201