Cases

OPINION KING, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Scott H. Goldstein appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the Chestnut Ridge Volunteer Fire Company (“Chestnut Ridge” or “the company”) and the individual members of its Executive Committee, the defendants below. Mr. Goldstein alleges that he was suspended and later terminated from Chestnut Ridge based on the substance of his speech, in vi

DISSENTING OPINION BY Judge LEAVITT. Respectfully, I dissent. The majority’s holding that WRC North Fork Heights, Inc. (WRC) failed to prove it was a purely public charity contravenes the binding precedent of G.D.L. Plaza Corp. v. Council Rock School District, 515 Pa. 54, 526 A.2d 1173 (1987) (G.D.L. Plaza ID, wherein our Supreme Court held that a federally subsidized low-income housing provide

218 F.3d 337 (4th Cir. 2000) SCOTT GOLDSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,V.THE CHESTNUT RIDGE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY; RICHARD YAFFEE; ROSS MCCAUSLAND; HARRY KAKEL; WILLIAM NEWBERREY, III; MICHAEL FOX; EUGENE REYNOLDS; NICK CORONEOS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.SCOTT GOLDSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,V.THE CHESTNUT RIDGE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY; RICHARD YAFFEE; ROSS MCCAUSLAND; HARRY KAKEL; WILLIAM NEWBERREY, III; MICHAEL FOX; EUGENE REYNOLDS; NICK

721 F.Supp.2d 1079 (2010) HOPE FOR FAMILIES & COMMUNITY SERVICE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. David WARREN, in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Macon County, Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc., and Milton McGregor, Defendants. Case No. 3:06-CV-1113-WKW[WO]. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. June 30, 2010.

633 N.E.2d 359 (1994) INDIANA WASTE SYSTEMS OF INDIANA, Inc., D/B/a Waste Management of Indianapolis, Petitioner, v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE, Respondent. No. 49T10-9201-TA-00004. Tax Court of Indiana. April 27, 1994. *361 James E. Freeman, Jr., Sansberry, Dickmann, Freeman & Builta, Anderson, for petitioner. <

799 F.Supp. 695 (1992) MICHIGAN PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SERVICE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Peggy BABIN, et al., Defendants. No. 90-70181. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. July 22, 1992. *696 *697 *698 *699</

2 F.3d 1514 62 USLW 2218 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORG., INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF CLEARWATER, Milton A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorneyof the City of Clearwater, Cynthia E. Goudeau,City Clerk of the City of Clearwater,Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-3988. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept

DUBINA, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves a challenge to an ordinance regulating the solicitation of funds by charitable organizations in the City of Clear-water, Florida (“Clearwater”). Plaintiff Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, Inc. (“Scientology”) claims that the ordinance deprives it of rights and liberties guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States in v

15 F.3d 443 62 USLW 2468, 89 Ed. Law Rep. 374 Jane DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.TAYLOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants,Mike Caplinger in his official capacities and Eddy Lankfordin his official and individual capacities,Defendants-Appellants. No. 90-8431. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. March 3,

Steadman, Senior Judge: Appealing his convictions for several firearm offenses, appellant James Toler argues that (1) all his convictions must be reversed because he was required to reveal his social security number without a prior Miranda 1 warning, and (2) his convictions for possession of unregistered firearm

DONDERO, J. *1238This action was brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)1 to challenge the proposed expansion of a Buddhist retreat center approved by defendant County of Sonoma (County). The County adopted a mitigated negative declaration (MND) in lieu of a formal environmental impact rep

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”) and four individuals— Grayson Barber, Pablo Garcia Molina, Peter Neumann, and Deborah Peel — have brought this action challenging a Final Rule issued by defendant, the United States Department of Education (“Department o

II. LEGAL STANDARDS Pursuant to the Second Circuit's direction, the court addresses only "issues of jurisdiction and justiciability" at this point in the proceedings. (Oct. 24, 2017, USCA Order; Oct. 27, 2017, Order (Dkt. 98).) Accordingly, the court will consider only those portions of Defendants' motion to dismiss that challenge the court's subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civi

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-0662 ══════════ The City of Austin, Petitioner, v. Noel Powell, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Third Distr

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge. Plaintiffs Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”) and four individuals— Grayson Barber, Pablo Garcia Molina, Peter Neumann, and Deborah Peel — have brought this action challenging a Final Rule issued by defendant, the United States Department of Education (“Department

MEMORANDUM McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Procedural History. .300 A. Administrative Enforcement Proceedings.300 B. Initial Complaint .301 C. Motion for Summary Judgment. 302 D. Supplemental Complaint.303 E. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injuncti

OPINION BY Judge LEAVITT. Servants Oasis appeals an order of the Lebanon County Court of Common Pleas (trial court) rejecting its application for a special exception to develop a religious retreat on its land in South Annville Township. In doing so, the trial court affirmed the decision of the South Annville Township Zoning Hearing Board (Zoning Board). Because Servants Oasis satisfied the objective criteria

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Kuharchik Construction, Inc., : Petitioner : : v. : No. 486 F.R. 2015 : Argued: June 9, 2020 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER,

Case: 23-50746 Document: 209-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/11/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50746 FILED

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOUG GREISEN, No. 17-35472 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:14-cv-01399-SI JON HANKEN, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge,