Cases

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion; in which Judge MOTZ and Judge TRAXLER joined. AGEE, Circuit Judge: The State of North Carolina requires persons convicted of certain reportable sex offenses to register as “sex offenders,” See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.6(4); id.' § 14-208.7(a). For persons convicted of a subset of those reportable sex offenses, North Carolina restricts their move

509 F.Supp.2d 1316 (2007) Mark Henry ROY, a Minor, by his Father and Next Friend, Sony ROY, and Sony ROY, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. FULTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Vicki Denmark, Individually and in her capacity as Area Superintendent, Ronald C. Tesch, Individually and in his capacity as Principal, Jeri Groves, Individually and in her capacity as Assistant Principal, Natalie S. Forbes, Individually and in her capacity as School Resource Officer

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6026 JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; JOHN DOE #3; JOHN DOE #4; JOHN DOE #5, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. ROY A. COOPER, III, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina; FRANK PARRISH, District Attorney, District 01; SETH EDWARDS, District Attorney, District 02; KIMBERLY ROBB, District Attorney, District 03A;

Dwyer, J. ¶1 Hugh and Martha Sisley (the Sisleys) appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment dismissal of their defamation action asserted against Seattle School District No. 1. The allegedly defamatory statement was written by a high school student journalist and published in *229a student newspaper, The Roosevelt News, which is produced as part of the schoo

NO. 12-13-00038-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JOAQUIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL § APPEAL FROM THE 273RD DISTRICT, APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SHELBY COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, SHELBY COUNTY APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD, SHELBYVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,

HARGRAVE, J. ¶ 1 This is appellant/school district's appeal from the trial judge's order reinstating career teacher Jerry Hagan.1 Appellant's board of education terminated Hagan under 70 0.8.2001 § 6-101.22(A)(8) 2 of the Teacher Due Process Act, for alleged "physical or mental abuse of a child." Hagan demanded a trial de novo in district court and sought reinstatement

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Doe v. Greenville City Schools, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4618.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any t

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND RENEWED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MOTIONS FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING, AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff John Doe alleges in an amended complaint that he agreed under duress to withdraw from the University of Michigan with only one semester left to complete his degree, after he was fou

Filed 8/29/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JANE DOE, H050830 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 20CV374714) v. MOUNT PLEASANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant a

ROY B. DALTON JR., United States District Judge *1207In this Title IX case, Defendant Rollins College ("Rollins ") moves to dismiss Plaintiff John Doe's Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 17 ("Motion ").) Plaintiff responded. (Doc. 25.) On review, the Motion is due to be denied.

[Cite as Doe v. Greenville City Schools, 2021-Ohio-2127.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DARKE COUNTY JANE DOE 1, A MINOR, et al. : : Plaintiffs-Appellees : Appellate Case No. 2020-CA-4 : v.

ROY L. RICHTER, Presiding Judge. Col. Daniel Isom, Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department, City of St. Louis, the St. Louis Circuit Attorney’s Office, and the Missouri State Highway Patrol (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal from a declaratory judgment in favor of John Doe (“Doe”), a Missouri resident, on Doe’s petition seeking removal of Doe’s name and identifying information from the federal and Missouri’s

919 P.2d 902 (1996) John STACKHOUSE and William Tomlinson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, COUNTY OF DENVER, Board of Education of the School District No. 1, County of Denver, State of Colorado, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95CA0592. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. May 2, 1996. *903 Law Offices of Jeffrey I. Sa

Affirmed and Opinion filed November 19, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-01026-CV CHARLES ROY RODRIGUEZ, Appellant V. JANE DOE, Appellee On Appeal from the 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No

Filed 8/18/25; Certified for Publication 9/8/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JOHN DOE R.L., F087142 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 22CV-04187) v. MERCED CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT,

470 F.Supp.2d 963 (2004) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Plaintiff v. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. Defendants Mrs. Lorene JOSHUA, et al. Intervenors Katherine KNIGHT, et al. Intervenors No. 4:82CV00866 WRWJTR. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. June 30, 2004. Philip E. Kaplan, Kaplan, Brewer, Maxey & Harals

58 P.3d 1091 (2002) SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Sherdyne CORNISH, Respondent-Appellant. No. 01CA2043. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. May 9, 2002. Certiorari Denied November 18, 2002. *1093 Semple, Miller & Mooney, P.C., Patrick B. Mooney, Wendy J. Shea, Denve

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. Vicki Brown filed this suit against the Hartshorne School District and its school board members under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (1988) (Title VII) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), alleging that she was the victim of national origin discrimination and retaliation. The district court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, concluding that

The Honorable Roy Ragland State Representative Post Office Box 610 Marshall, Arkansas 72650-0610 Dear Representative Ragland: I am writing in response to your request for my opinion on the following questions: 1. Is a private water association obligated to terminate the water service of delinquent Marble Falls Water, Sewer Solid Waste Suburban Improvement District No. 1 sewer customers? 2. Is a suburban improvement district, specifically a sewer sy

CHATELAIN,* Judge. | jin this tort case, the plaintiff, a law firm clerical employee, alleging that a lawyer-member of the law firm assaulted and raped her on the firm’s premises after business hours, seeks to hold a two-person limited liability law firm liable. Finding that the plaintiff cannot establish the law firm1 owed her an independent duty in its capacity as