Cases

192 F.Supp.2d 885 (2002) Connie LOMBARDO, and Steven R. Myron, M.D., Plaintiffs, v. John LOMBARDO, John Doe, and Jane Doe Defendants. No. 1:99-CV-95. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. March 21, 2002. *886 David A Gunter, Dean Mead, Viera, FL, for Connie Lombardo, Steven R Myron, MD, plaintiffs.

14 P.3d 288 (2000) 199 Ariz. 97 Joseph LOMBARDO and Jacqueline Lombardo, husband and wife, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. Elaine ALBU and John Doe Albu, husband and wife; Phillip Mercurio, Jr. and Jane Doe Mercurio, husband and wife; Century 21 Alliance and Investment Group, an Arizona corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. CV-99-0316-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

OPINION LANKFORD, Judge. ¶ 1 Appellants Joseph and Jacqueline Lombardo, sellers in a residential real estate transaction, appeal from the summary judgment in favor of Elaine Albu, agent for the buyers. We affirm. ¶ 2 After making the Lombardos an offer, the buyers told Albu that they anticipated some difficulty obtaining financing. Albu did not disclose the buyers’ financial situation

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Beverage Holdings, L.L.C. v. 5701 Lombardo, L.L.C., Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-4716, 2019- Ohio-4716.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Fron

[Cite as Cleveland v. Lombardo, 2025-Ohio-551.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CITY OF CLEVELAND, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 114018 v. : NICHOLAS LOMBARDO, :

Sorcigli v Lombardo (2025 NY Slip Op 02365) Sorcigli v Lombardo 2025 NY Slip Op 02365 Decided on April 23, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Filed 12/4/24; certified for publication 12/31/24 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- LISA LOMBARDO et al., C098857 Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 34-

People v Lombardo (2021 NY Slip Op 07580) People v Lombardo 2021 NY Slip Op 07580 Decided on December 30, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

People v Lombardo (2021 NY Slip Op 07580) People v Lombardo 2021 NY Slip Op 07580 Decided on December 30, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

Filed 9/11/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Tehama) ---- THE PEOPLE, C090041 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. NCR41795) v. VINCENT MICHAEL LOMBARDO,

Cite as: 594 U. S. ____ (2021) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JODY LOMBARDO, ET AL. v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 20–391. Decided June 28, 2021 PER CURIAM. On the afternoon of December 8, 2015, St. Louis police officers arrested Nicholas Gilbert

OPINION Kevin Jewell, Justice Appellant Julie Gaylene Lombardo contends her sentence for first-degree felony theft is illegal. Appellant also argues that the trial court erred by re-sentencing her in her absence and by revoking her “regular” community supervision. We first conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking appellant’s community supervision. However,

The issue before us is whether the defendant is entitled to jail credit for time he spent awaiting trial, or whether he already received appropriate credit for that time on an earlier sentence for a probation violation. After review, we conclude that the defendant already received credit for the time he served and that awarding him additional jail credit would be "double counting" and inappropriate. On August 5, 2010, the defendant was arraig

Heavican, C.J. I. NATURE OF CASE A former patient sued a psychiatrist for medical malpractice. The psychiatrist moved for summary judgment. The psychiatrist averred that he had met the applicable standard of care and that he had given to the patient all materials in his possession pertaining to the patient's care. The court granted the patient a 90-day continuance

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/18/2018 02:14 AM CDT - 400 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 299 Nebraska R eports LOMBARDO v. SEDLACEK Cite as 299 Neb. 400 M arc A. Lombardo, appellant and cros

NOELLE C. COLLINS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *886MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 63).1 The Motion is fully briefed and ready for disposition. For the following reasons, Defendants' Motion for Summary

SOUTER, Associate Justice. This appeal is from the bankruptcy court’s dismissal on summary judgment of John Zullo’s adversary proceeding against debtor David Lombardo, after denying Zullo leave to amend his complaint. We affirm. In September 2010, Lombardo filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. In December, Zul-lo began an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court, alleging that Lombar-do’s debt to him was n

*1004Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

[J-106-2018] [MO: Donohue, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SHIRETTA JUSTICE, : No. 17 EAP 2018 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of : Commonwealth Court entered on : 11/14

[J-106-2018] [MO: Donohue, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SHIRETTA JUSTICE, : No. 17 EAP 2018 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of : Commonwealth Court entered on : 11/14/2017 at N