Cases

MEMORANDUM & ORDER SEYBERT, District Judge: Plaintiff Tremaine Johnson (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action against his current employer, defendant Long Island University (“LIU”), alleging disparate treatment and hostile work environment on account of his race and gender in violation of: (1) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; (2) 42 U

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J), dated January 4, 2012, as granted the motion of the defendants Long Island University and C.W Post College of Long Island University pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with cost

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J), dated January 4, 2012, as granted the motion of the defendants Long Island University and C.W Post College of Long Island University pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with cost

378 F.Supp.2d 128 (2005) Sandra CARLSON and Marjorie Cummings, on Behalf of Themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER, North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, North Short-Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc., American Hospital Association, and John Does 1-10, Defendants. No. CV 04-3086. United States District Court, E.D. New York.

789 F.Supp.2d 403 (2011) Amrita MADRAY, Plaintiff, v. LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY and Jeffrey Kane as aider and abettor, Defendants. No. 10-CV-3841 (ADS)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 2, 2011. *405 The Law Offices of Joseph Ruotolo, LLC, by Joseph Carmine Ruotolo, Esq., of Counsel, Babylon, NY, for Plaintiff.

June 28, 2021 Supreme Court No. 2019-167-Appeal. (PC 17-4635) Jane Doe : v. : Brown University et al. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before

SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, hel

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., United States District Judge. Courts have recognized a private right of action under Title IX to remedy gender discrimination at federally-funded educational institutions (“schools”) in cases of discrimination between two students at a school, and between a teacher and a student at a school. By bringing this case against' Brown University and two of its administra

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., United States District Judge Jane Doe, a senior at Brown University, was caught cheating on a take-home exam and admitted as much in a letter to the University’s Academic Code Committee. Applying the Academic Code, Brown conducted a hearing and imposed a punishment that was harsher than Jane Doe likely expected, because this turned out to be her second incident of

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW William E. Smith, Chief Judge This case arises out of a disciplinary proceeding in which Brown University (“Brown” or “University”) found John Doe (“John” or “Doe”) responsible for sexual misconduct against fellow student Ann Roe (“Ann”).1 The parties agreed to waive the jury demand and hold an expedited consolidated bench trial on both

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS SAYLOR, United States District Judge This is a civil action arising out of an investigation conducted by a university into alleged sexual misconduct. Jurisdiction is ■ based on diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff “John Doe” was an undergraduate student at defendant Brandéis University. For nearly two years, he and another male Brand

17-2725-cv Henry Lockhart v. MTA Long Island Railroad 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 August Term, 2017 5 Docket No. 17-2725-cv 6 --------------------------------- 7 HENRY LOCKHART, 8 9 Plaintiff – Appellant, 10 11 v. 12 13 MTA LONG ISLAND RAILROAD, 1

659 F.Supp.2d 367 (2009) John Carlo MANIGAULTE, Plaintiff, v. C.W. POST OF LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY, Defendant. No. 08-CV-1853(JS)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 15, 2009. *371 John Carlo Manigaulte, Kings Park, NY, pro se. Catherine Murphy, Esq., Office General Counsel, Long Island University,

Denis R. Hurley, Unites States District Judge *213INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Long Island Pure Water Ltd. ("Plaintiff") brought this action seeking injunctive relief and damages for violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERLA

LEVAL, Circuit Judge: Defendant Angela Trigg appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Gold, M.J.) awarding Plaintiff Melissa Stampf damages on her claim of malicious prosecution. Trigg contends that the district court erred in denying her motions (1) for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed.R.C

MEMORANDUM OPINION Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge Before the Court for disposition is Plaintiff John Doe’s Motion for a ’Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Following a hearing on August 10-11, 2017 and upon thoughtful consideration of the parties’ arguments, this Motion will be granted in accordance with the reasoning set forth below. I. BACKGROUND

*897Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying appellant’s motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

89 F.Supp.2d 353 (2000) Dr. Fernando COMMODARI, Plaintiff, v. LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY and Long Island University Faculty Federation, Local 3998, NYSUT, AFT, AFL-CIO, Defendants. Civil Action No. CV-99-2581 (DGT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 31, 2000. *354 *355

MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Charmaine Fraser ("plaintiff") brings this action against her employer, defendant MTA Long Island Rail Road ("LIRR" or "defendant"), alleging gender discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.§§ 2000e et seq. , as amended ("Title VII"), the New York State Human Rights Law,

Supreme Court No. 2023-148-Appeal. (WC 16-402) The University of Rhode Island Board : of Trustees et al. v. : Hellenic Society Paideia – : Rhode Island Chapter. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Repo