⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Doe v. Rees”

Rees v. Gordonpublic domain
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2025-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 19-AUG-2025 07:58 AM Dkt. 101
Rees v. Gordonpublic domain
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2025-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 19-AUG-2025 07:58 AM Dkt. 101
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019-05-29 · Published · cited 10× · 384 F. Supp. 3d 598
Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge Before the Court is defendant Fairfax County School Board's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 100], which has been fully briefed and argued. For the reasons stated in this Memorandum Opinion, the Motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff John Doe 2 (the "Student"), a 16-year-old student, and John Doe 1, the Student's father
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020-04-30 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐2230 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. MICHAEL REES, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020-04-30 · Published · cited 18× · 957 F.3d 761
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐2230 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. MICHAEL REES, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Rees v. Reespublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-04-06 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Ohio 1235
[Cite as Rees v. Rees, 2026-Ohio-1235.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO MADISON COUNTY WILLIAM REES, : CASE NO. CA2025-07-019 Appellee, : OPINION AND vs.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020-04-30 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐2230 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. MICHAEL REES, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Moore v. Reespublic domain
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015-10-13 · Published · cited 1× · 138 F. Supp. 3d 860; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138861; 2015 WL 5945651
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KAREN K. CALDWELL, CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY This matter is before the Court to address several issues' previously raised in this proceeding, including: • whether the plaintiffs’ .claims are barred by the statute of limitations under Cooey v. Strickland, 479 F.3d 412 (6th Cir.2007) [R. 139, 146
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992-10-15 · Published · cited 22× · 851 P.2d 143; 174 Ariz. 518; 123 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 34; 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1208; 1992 Ariz. App. LEXIS 286; 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,598; 61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1630
174 Ariz. 518 (1992) 851 P.2d 143 Clyde MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SERVICEMASTER BY REES, Carolyn Powers and John Doe Powers, wife and husband, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 90-0644. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. October 15, 1992. Review Denied May 18, 1993.[*]
Wilson v. Reespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010-09-03 · Published · cited 1× · 620 F.3d 699; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18455; 2010 WL 3450078
620 F.3d 699 (2010) Gregory Lee WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John D. REES, Defendant, Thomas Simpson, in his official capacity as Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary; Scott Haas, in his official capacity as Medical Director for the Kentucky Department of Corrections; Steve Beshear, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky; LaDonna H. Thompson, in her official capacity as Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Corr
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021-09-28 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO RICHARD WILLIAM BANGERT, et al., ) No. ED109319 ) Appellants, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Cape Girardeau County v. ) Cause No. 18CG-AC00455-01
Wilson v. Reespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010-10-14 · Published · cited 0× · 624 F.3d 737; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 21296; 2010 WL 4105622
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge, dissenting frpm denial of rehearing en banc. I continue to disagree with the claim-accrual analysis for method-of-execution claims announced in Cooey v. Strickland (Cooey II), 479 F.3d 412 (6th Cir.2007), and therefore I dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc. See, e.g., Cooey v. Strickland, 489 F.3d 775, 776-78 (6th Cir.2007) (Gilman, J., dissenting
Wilson v. Reespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010-10-14 · Published · cited 2× · 620 F.3d 699
624 F.3d 737 (2010) Gregory Lee WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John D. REES, Defendant, Thomas Simpson, in his official capacity as Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary; Scott Haas, in his official capacity as Medical Director for the Kentucky Department of Corrections; Steve Beshear, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky; LaDonna H. Thompson, in her official capacity as Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Corr
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2021-08-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 20-0858 Filed August 4, 2021 ADAM MICHAEL REES, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Grundy County, Bradley J. Harris, Judge. Adam Rees appeals the dismissal of his postconviction-relief application. REVERSED AND REMAN
Mitchell v. Reespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011-06-30 · Published · cited 40× · 651 F.3d 593; 79 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1353; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13309; 2011 WL 2566940
651 F.3d 593 (2011) Joe Clark MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. John REES, Warden, Respondent. No. 09-5570. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: November 30, 2010. Decided and Filed: June 30, 2011. *594 ARGUED: Paul R. Bottei, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Je
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2022-06-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00666-SCT KAREN REES McGEE v. COMPREHENSIVE RADIOLOGY SERVICES, PLLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/18/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RHEA HUDSON SHELDON TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: WILLIAM V. WESTBROOK, III LES W. SMITH JOHN BURLEY HOWELL, III
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2021-03-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-1026 Filed March 3, 2021 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ASHLEY MARIE REES, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Joel A. Dalrymple, Judge. Ashley Rees appeals her conviction for theft in the second degree as a habitual offende
Ligon v. Reespublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010-05-13 · Published · cited 2× · 364 S.W.3d 28; 2010 Ark. 225; 2010 Ark. LEXIS 264
364 S.W.3d 28 (2010) 2010 Ark. 225 Stark LIGON, Executive Director of the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, Appellant, v. Frank David REES, Arkansas Bar No. 79238, Appellee. No. 09-556. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 13, 2010. Rehearing Denied June 24, 2010. *29 Stark Ligon,
Ligon v. Reespublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010-05-13 · Published · cited 0× · 364 S.W.3d 1; 2010 Ark. 227; 2010 Ark. LEXIS 272
RONALD L. SHEFFIELD, Justice. liAppellant Stark Ligón, Executive Director of the Office of Professional Conduct (OPC), appeals from a February 23, 2009 order filed by Panel C of the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (Committee) finding that David Rees violated Rule 1.8(e) of the Arkansas Model Rules of Professional Conduct.1 On appeal, the OPC argues that the Com
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016-06-27 · Published · cited 55× · 2016 CO 51; 373 P.3d 603; 2016 Colo. LEXIS 676; 2016 WL 3574392
JUSTICE EID delivered the Opinion of the Court. 1 Petitioner John Van Rees, Sr., sells metaphysical crystals through his website, ExquisiteCrystals.com. Van Rees contracted with respondent Unleaded Software, Inc., to perform web-related services and to design additional websites. After Unleaded missed deadlines and failed to deliver the promised services, Van