Cases

MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on United Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration [Doc. 6]. The Court, having considered the motion, briefs, and relevant law, and being otherwise fully informed, finds that the Motion is well-taken and will be granted. BACKGROUND OptumHealth New Mexico "("OHNM") is a joint venture that was formed by Un

MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss All Claims Against It filed by defendant Public Consulting Group, Inc. ("PCG"). [Doc. 7]. The Court, having considered the motion, briefs, and relevant law, and being otherwise fully informed, finds that the Motion is well-taken and will be granted. BACKGROUND Defendant United Be

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID WIT; NATASHA WIT; Nos. 20-17363 BRIAN MUIR; BRANDT PFEIFER, 21-15193 on behalf of the Estate of his deceased wife, Lauralee Pfeifer; LORI D.C. No. 3:14- FLANZRAICH, on behalf of her cv-02346-JCS daughter Casey Flanzraich; CECILIA HOLDNAK, on behalf of herself, her daughter Emily Holdnak; GARY ORDER AND ALEXANDE

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID WIT; NATASHA WIT; Nos. 20-17363 BRIAN MUIR; BRANDT PFEIFER, 21-15193 on behalf of the Estate of his deceased wife, Lauralee Pfeifer; LORI D.C. No. 3:14-cv- FLANZRAICH, on behalf of her 02346-JCS daughter Casey Flanzraich; CECILIA HOLDNAK, on behalf of herself, her daughter Emily Holdnak; GARY OPINION ALEXANDE

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID WIT; NATASHA WIT; Nos. 20-17363 BRIAN MUIR; BRANDT PFEIFER, 21-15193 on behalf of the Estate of his deceased wife, Lauralee Pfeifer; LORI D.C. No. 3:14-cv- FLANZRAICH, on behalf of her 02346-JCS daughter Casey Flanzraich; CECILIA HOLDNAK, on behalf of herself, her daughter Emily Holdnak; GARY OPINION ALEXANDE

Filed 9/25/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE BRITNEE CAMPBELL, Plaintiff and Respondent, G062886 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2022- 01261811) SUNSHINE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC, OPINION

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

Filed 10/19/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE CRESTWOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., A158830 Plaintiff and Respondent, (City and County of San v. Francisco Super. Ct. No. CPF- DEEVERIA LACY, 19-5165

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 48353 ACCESS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) Boise, May 2022 Term ) v. ) Opinion filed: September 16, 2022

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs in these putative class actions allege that they were improperly denied coverage for mental health and substance use disorder treatment by Defendant United Behavioral Health (“UBH”), which administers mental health and substance use disorder benefits under their health insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/11/2021 08:13 AM CDT - 692 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 308 Nebraska Reports OMNI BEHAVIORAL HEALTH v. STATE Cite as 308 Neb. 692 OMNI Behavioral Health, a Nebraska nonp

Filed 5/1/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- CRESTWOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., C094882 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No.

Credible Behavioral Health, Inc. v. Emmanuel Johnson, No. 19, September Term 2019. Opinion by Greene, J. APPEAL AND ERROR—JUDGE AS FACTFINDER BELOW Under Maryland Rule 7–131(f), the circuit court, when hearing an appeal on the record from the district court, reviews the district court’s factual determinations for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. CONTRACTS—CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION—GENERAL RULES OF CONSTRUCTION Under the promissory note at issue, employees are required to repay t

Filed 4/24/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO CHRISTINE MATLOCK DOUGHERTY, Plaintiff and Respondent, E079741 v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVSB2209642) U.S. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN, OPINION Defendant and Appell

JUSTICE TIMMER, opinion of the Court: ¶1 Medicare Part C, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395w-21 et seq., permits enrollees to obtain Medicare-covered healthcare services from private healthcare organizations and their third-party contractors. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., regulates health plans offered by private employers to employees. We today hold that the administrative

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EMPLOYEE #1, Plaintiff, v. No. 23-cv-2553 (DLF) DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION After a patient murdered another patient at St. Elizabeth’s Hospital, the hospital fired Employee 1, a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROBERT CHIPMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-456 (TJK) CIGNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC. et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert Chipman alleges that his health insurance plan administrator, Cigna, improperly denied coverage for residential mental

OPINION GOULD, Judge: ¶ 1 This appeal presents the question of whether two health care providers, Aurora Behavioral Healthcare (“Aurora”) and Maricopa Integrated Health System (“MIHS”) (collectively the “Providers”), may compel arbitration of coverage claims arising under Medicare and ERISA health care plans. The Providers seek to compel arbitration purs

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND ITS SUBSIDIARY PACIFICARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MARICOPA INTEGRATED HEALTH SYSTEM, AN ARIZONA SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT, Defendant/Appellee. UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SLADE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-cv-1837 (CRC) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Slade Smith is a climate control mechanic at Saint Elizabeths Hospital (“St. Elizabeths”) in Washington, D.C. He filed this pro se