Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Don E. Griesemer”
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 30 2020, 10:16 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
William Ray Neeb v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Oct 13 2015, 9:00 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Lawrence D. Newman Gregory F. Zoeller Newman & Newman, P.C.
Samantha T. v. Superior Courtpublic domain
Opinion BENKE, Acting P. J. In this writ proceeding we are called upon to interpret and apply the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 362.7,1 which permit a county health and human services agency to place a dependent child in the home of a “nonrelated extended family member” (NREFM). Under the terms of the statute, a NREFM is anyone “who has an established familial
Robert Lewis III v. State of Indianapublic domain
MASSA, Justice.' Robert Lewis III brings this direct appeal after a jury convicted him of the murder of Jennifer Kocsis, murder in the perpetration of criminal deviate conduct, criminal deviate conduct, and resisting law enforcement. Lewis challenges various aspects of the proceedings below, including the admission of certain evidence, the adequacy of the jury instructions, and
Mathias Gaumer v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be May 31 2016, 9:49 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing Court of Appeals
Paul R. Solt, Jr. v. State of Indianapublic domain
FILED Apr 30 2026, 9:42 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Kline v. Security Guards Incpublic domain
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-14-2004 Kline v. Security Guards Inc Precedential or
MD Mall Assocs., LLC v. CSX Transp., Inc.public domain
Juan R. Sánchez, District Judge. This case involves a dispute between neighboring property owners: a shopping mall and a railroad. Plaintiff MD Mall Associates, LLC, t/a MacDade Mall Associates, L.P., owns and operates the MacDade Mall, a shopping center located on property adjacent to and downhill from a railroad track and right-of-way owned and operated by Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc. During heavier rains, storm water pools
S.H. ex rel. Holt v. United Statespublic domain
AMENDED ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge. The following is the court’s opinion and order after trial. In this case the plaintiffs allege medical malpractice on the part of United States *1115Air Force medical personnel. (Amended) Pretrial Conference Order (Final), Undisputed Facts (“Facts”) (ECF No. 82) ¶ 1.
Charles Williams v. Bryan Stirlingpublic domain
AGEE, Circuit Judge: After shooting and killing his former girlfriend, Charles Christopher Williams was convicted by a South Carolina jury of kidnapping, murder, and possession of a firearm during a violent crime. He was sentenced to death for the murder. After exhausting state remedies, Williams petitioned the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina for a writ
Kopolovic v. Shahpublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Kopolovic v. Shah, 2012 IL App (2d) 110383 Appellate Court RICHARD KOPOLOVIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAMLESH SHAH and Caption MIDWEST CENTER FOR DAY SURGERY, LLC, Defendants- Appellees. District & No. Second District Docket No. 2-11-0383 Filed
Charles Williams v. Bryan Stirlingpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2 CHARLES CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS, Petitioner – Appellee, v. BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; WILLIE D. DAVIS, Warden of Kirkland Correctional Institution, Respondents – Appellants, and JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Warden of
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Mar 20 2019, 6:57 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing Co
William Taylor, Parent of Joseph Taylor, a Minor v. Secretary of Health & Human Services 0public domain
Vaccine Act; Motion for Review of Special Master’s Decision; DTaP Vaccination; Infantile Spasms; Lack of Evidence of Causation; Althen Test. OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. This case comes before the Court on review of Special Master Dee Lord’s September 20, 2012 decision denying compensation to Pet
People v. Powellpublic domain
I. FACTS A. Guilt Phase Evidence 1. Prosecution evidence Tammy Epperson was a recovering heroin addict who had recently completed a 12-step treatment program and held a responsible job. Epperson lived on her own at Ballington Plaza, an apartment complex that accepted referrals from substance abuse recovery and in
Magma Copper Co. v. Industrial Commissionpublic domain
OPINION BROOKS, Judge. Two issues are presented by the petitioner-employer in this special action review of an award by the respondent Commission in a workmen’s compensation proceeding. 1. Did respondent employee forthwith report the accident and injury resulting therefrom to his employer as required by A.R.S. § 23-908 (Supp.1982)? 2
People v. Erskinepublic domain
Opinion of the Court by Liu, J. *282 Defendant Scott Thomas Erskine was sentenced to death in 2004 for the first degree murders of Charles Keever and Jonathan Sellers. This appeal is automatic. ( Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b).) We affirm the judgment in its entirety.
Youst v. Keck's Food Service, Inc.public domain
OPINION BY OLSON, J.: Appellant, Keck’s Food Service, Inc., appeals from the judgment entered on July 10, 2013, in favor of Robert A. Youst, Geraldine Youst, and Denny S. Youst (herein collectively “Appellees” or “the Yousts”) and against Appellant. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. On September 16, 2009, the Yousts instituted the current action against Appellant. Within the Yousts’ Second
Hague v. United Paperworkers International Unionpublic domain
949 F.Supp. 979 (1996) Jonathan HAGUE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, Hudson River Local No. 18 and Finch, Pruyn and Company, Inc., Defendants. No. 96-CV-463. United States District Court, N.D. New York. December 28, 1996. *980 Law Office of William E. Montgomery, III, William E. Montgomery, III, Glens Fal
Kline v. Security Guards, Inc.public domain
386 F.3d 246 Daulph KLINE; Terry Kline, individually, and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated; David J. Bigg; Joseph T. Coulson; Robert L. Lash; John M. Spears, Jr., William Allen; James Allen; John Alsvan; Edward Anderson; Kenneth Arters, Jr.; Tony Azzarello; Terry Bachert; Glenn Balthaser; Thomas Bartashus; Francis Beierschmitt; Gerald Bender; Joe Bickelman; Brett Billings; Joseph Biscanti; Vernon Bloom, Jr.; Michael Bodolus; Christopher B