Cases

18-474-cv Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, et al. v. Donald J. Trump United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 17th day of August, two thousand twenty. PRESENT: ROBERT A. KATZMANN,

19-1540-cv Donald J. Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2019 Argued: August 23, 2019 Decided: December 3, 2019 Docket No. 19‐1540‐cv ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DONALD J. TRUMP, DONALD J. TRUMP, JR., ERIC TRUMP, IVANKA TRUMP, DONALD J. TRUMP REVOCABLE TRUST,

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The majority’s creation — from whole cloth — of a substantial-compliance standard in Part VI is a dramatic judicial amendment of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) without textual or precedential justification. It is both a usurpation of regulatory authority and an invitation for courts to engage in arbitrary decisionmaking. And, the majority pro

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: June 2, 2022 * * * * * * * * * * * * * DEBRA ALLEN, * PUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 15-1278V

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

COOK, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which COLE, C.J., and BOGGS, BATCHELDER, MOORE, GRIFFIN, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, JJ., joined. BOGGS, J. (pp. 863-71), delivered a separate concurring opinion in which BATCHELDER, MOORE, WHITE, and STRANCH, JJ., joined. WHITE, J. (pp. 871-76), delivered a separate concurring opinion in which BATCHELDER, MOORE, and STRANCH, JJ., joined. SUTTON, J. (pp. 876-81), delivered a separate dissenting opinion in wh

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

92 F.3d 1444 65 USLW 2165 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Nathan WALL (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008),Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 95-5007, 95-5008. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Oct. 2, 1995.Decided Aug. 15, 1996.Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct.22, 199

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge. This appeal involves investors who by purchasing securities took a risk for the purpose of securing an economic advantage but, failing to exercise prudence, instead suffered a loss. Plaintiffs claim defendants, sellers of the securities, defrauded them; when in fact what plaintiffs had done was to make a bad investment. Plaintiffs Michael Halperin, M.D., and Donald Kern, D.D.S., appeal from a judgme

Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. The Court is asked once again to consider whether the race-conscious admissions program at the University of Texas is lawful under the Equal Protection Clause. I The University of Texas at Austin (or University) relies upon a complex system of admissions that has undergone significant evolution over the past two decades. Until 1996, the Universit

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 3737749 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/12/2015 4:19:03 PM

ACCEPTED 14-14-01021-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 14-14-01021-CV 12/29/2014 10:03:31 PM

ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT Before the Court are two motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (Clerk’s No. 262); and (2)Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, and Class Representative Service Awards (Clerk’s No. 263). A fairness hearing was held on January 21, 2016. Clerk’

HILL, Chief Justice, dissenting. It is well-established that mandamus, as an extraordinary remedy, should not issue unless othe trial court has either (1) clearly abused its discretion or (2) failed to observe a mandatory statutory provision conferring a right or forbidding a particular action. E.g., Abor v. Black, 695 S.W.2d 564, 567 (Tex.1985); State Bar of Texas v. Heard, 603 S.W.2d 829, 83

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CONCERNING ACTION TO DENY DISCHARGE J. PHILIP KLINGEBERGER, Bankruptcy Judge. This adversary proceeding was initiated by the plaintiff Kenneth A. Manning, as Trustee of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy es*630tate of Cecil Allen Watkins and Debra Tabla Watkins [case number 09-21095] (“Trustee”) by a complaint filed on March

842 N.E.2d 1219 (2006) 363 Ill. App.3d 385 299 Ill.Dec. 867 AMERICAN SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Karolina PASALKA, Clarence Davis, Laura Sandifer, Matilda Bruce, Maciej A. Chowaniec, Beata M. Bogdan, John Gray, Petio Neykov, Cindy L. Graham, Jerome Brown, Delta Cobbs, Pedro Rosales, Jesus Rosales, Silvia Torres, Thelma Neal, Benjamin Gonzales, Jr., Debra Trotter, Melissa F. Hu

295 F.3d 352 Michael HALPERIN, M.D., Donald Kern, D.D.S. and all other plaintiffs similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.EBANKER USA.COM, INC., Evision USA.Com, Inc., American Fronteer Financial Corporation, Fai Chan, Tong Wan Chan, Robert Trapp, Kwok Jen Fong, David Chen, Gary Cook, Jeffrey Busch, and Robert Jeffers, Jr., Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-7440. United States Court of Appea

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 7, 2000 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TIMOTHY MCKINNEY Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County Nos. 98-01434, 98-01435 Joseph B. Dailey, Judge No. W1999-00844-CCA-R3-DD - Filed March 28, 2001 We affirm the defendant’s convictions of first degree murder and attempted

The opinion of the court was delivered by Per Curiam,: Defendant Reginald Dexter Carr, Jr., and his brother, Jonathan D. Carr, were jointly charged, convicted, and sentenced for crimes committed in a series of three incidents in December 2000 in Wichita. This is R. Carr’s direct appeal from his 50 convictions and 4 death sentences. In the first incident on December 7 and 8, Andrew S