Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Donald Scott Livingston and Charlotte Ann Livingston”
Herrera v. Charlotte School of Law, LLCpublic domain
Herrera v. Charlotte School of Law, LLC, 2018 NCBC 34. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE MECKLENBURG COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 17 CVS 1965 [MASTER FILE] 17 CVS 4265; 17 CVS 5870; 17 CVS 6749; 17 CVS 7851 DANIEL HERRERA; TALECE HUNTER; ARIQUE DROSS, III; STACEY KING; DAWN PATTERSON; WILL
264 F.3d 344 (3rd Cir. 2001) IN RE: ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1014)J.T. Bradley and Kathy W. Bradley, Appellants in No. 00-3899Regina M. Luellen and Eurston Luellen, Sr., Appellants in No. 00-3900Randal Jon Uribe, Appellant in No. 00-3901Mitchell H. Walker and Kim S. Walker, Appellants in No. 00-3902Jose Morfin, Appellant in No. 00-3903Mary K. Mullen Schmelter and Kurt Allen Schmelter, Appel
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLAY PRINTING COMPANY, Defendant-Appelleepublic domain
955 F.2d 936 58 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 256,58 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,272EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CLAY PRINTING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-2576. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued Oct. 30, 1991.Decided Feb. 5, 1992.As Amended March 2, 1992.
ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
In Re Toyota Motor Corp.public domain
785 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Foreign Plaintiffs' Economic Loss Cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *888 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton
Alexander v. Governor of St of Okpublic domain
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH DEC 13 2004 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER Clerk
In Re African-American Slave Descendants Litigationpublic domain
304 F.Supp.2d 1027 (2004) In re AFRICAN-AMERICAN SLAVE DESCENDANTS LITIGATION No. MDL 1491, No. 02 C 7764. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 26, 2004. *1028 *1029 *1030 *1031
In Re African-American Slave Descendants Litigationpublic domain
375 F.Supp.2d 721 (2005) In re AFRICAN-AMERICAN SLAVE DESCENDANTS LITIGATION. MDL No. 1491, No. 02 C 7764. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 6, 2005. *722 *723 *724 *725 Benjamin Obi Nwoye, Mend
Menard-Sanford v. Mabey (In re A.H. Robins Co.)public domain
WIDENER, Circuit Judge: On July 26, 1988, the bankruptcy court and the district court jointly confirmed the “Sixth Amended and Restated Plan of Reorganization” (the Plan) submitted by A.H. Robins Company, Inc. (Robins). In Re A.H. Robins Co. Inc., 88 B.R. 742 (E.D.Va. 1988). Rosemary Menard-Sanford and certain other personal injury claimants, who voted against the Plan, appeal. -They challenge the district court’s a
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
880 F.2d 694 19 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 997, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,955 In re A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor. (Eight Cases.)Rosemary MENARD-SANFORD; Karen Valenzuela; ConstanceMiller Engelsberg; Nancy Lauri Adams; CarolynHarris, Claimants-Appellants,v.Ralph R. MABEY; The Official Committee of Equity SecurityHolders; The Official Unsecured Creditors Committee of A.H.Robins Company, Incor
815 F.Supp. 620 (1993) In re INTEGRATED RESOURCES REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS SECURITIES LITIGATION. MDL No. 897, No. MISC. 21-61 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 8, 1993. As Amended February 11, 1993. *621 *622 *623
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state
Jimenez Ex Rel. Estate of Jimenez v. Chrysler Corp.public domain
74 F.Supp.2d 548 (1999) Sergio JIMENEZ, as Personal Representative of the Estate of the Late Sergio Hernandez Jimenez, II, Plaintiff, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant. No. CivA. 2:96-1269-11. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. December 2, 1999. *549 *550
Knight v. State of Ala.public domain
787 F.Supp. 1030 (1991) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., Alma S. Freeman, John T. Gibson, Susan Buskey, Carl Petty, Dennis Charles Barnett by his father Arthur D. Barnett, Vonda Cross, Tammi Palmer, Alease S. Sims, Stacey Levise Sims by her parents Levi Sims and Alease S. Sims, Gary Mitchell, Jr., Grover L. Brown, Frederick Carodine, Frankie Patricia Yarbrough, Dr. Charles Edwards McMillan, Horace W. Rice, Anthony Y. Lavonne Thompson by his mother Lois N. Thompson,
Alexander v. Oklahomapublic domain
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge. On May 31, 1921, and following into the next day, violent attacks destroyed the African-American community of Greenwood, Oklahoma. An angry white mob converged on Greenwood in a devastating assault, burning homes and businesses, killing up to three hundred people, and leaving thousands homeless. In February 2003, Plaintiffs-Appellants, all Riot survivors or descendants of survivors, filed suit a
Perry v. Brownpublic domain
This is a suit in equity wherein the bill is filed by the executors and trustees under the will of Julia P.A. Anthony, for instructions on certain questions arising under the will and involving the construction thereof; the case has been certified to this court, for its determination under cap. 289, § 35, Gen. Laws, 1909, being ready for hearing for final decree. The will of Julia P.A. Anthony is entirely in her own handwriting, and consists of sixteen pages clearly and neatly wri
Alexander v. Oklahomapublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge, joins. No case in my tenure on the court could be more compellingly described as meeting the Rule 35 en banc standard of presenting a “question of exceptional importance” deserving the attention of the entire court than this. In one of the more shameful events in our nation’s history, over two hundred African-Americans were slaughtered and a