Cases

(2008) Hanyuan DONG, Plaintiff, v. Virginia GARCIA, Defendant. No. 07 C 3425. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 23, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge. Plaintiff Hanyuan Dong filed a personal injury complaint against Virginia Garcia. Since the complaint was filed, Garc

352 F.Supp.2d 373 (2005) Jin Dong DENG, Petitioner, v. Michael GARCIA, as Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Respondent. No. 04-CV-2032-NGG. United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 15, 2005. *374 S. Jean Smith, New York City, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM & O

SUMMARY ORDER Jian Min Dong, though counsel, petitions for review of the BIA’s January 2005 decision denying a motion to reopen and reconsider its September 2004 order affirming the decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under *114the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity w

SUMMARY ORDER Jian Min Dong, though counsel, petitions for review of the BIA’s January 2005 decision denying a motion to reopen and reconsider its September 2004 order affirming the decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under *114the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity w

*268SUMMARY ORDER At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 11th day of May, two thousand and six. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED

SUMMARY ORDER Qin Dong, though counsel, petitions for review of the BIA decision affirming Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Douglas Schoppert’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. Where, as here, the BIA summarily affirms the decision of

SUMMARY ORDER AFTER ARGUMENT AND UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Baer, J.), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is DISMISSED. *857As specified by the parties at oral argument, this case is now moot. We theref

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Ai Ming Dong, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of an October 11, 2005 decision of the BIA denying his motion to reconsider and reopen. In Re Ai Ming Dong, No. A71 567 638 (B.I.A. Oct. 11, 2005). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion.

513 F.Supp.2d 1158 (2007) Jianhua DONG and Hong Chen, Plaintiffs, v. Michael CHERTOFF, et al., Defendants. No. C 07-0266 SBA. United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division. September 6, 2007. *1159 Justin X. Wang, Baughman & Wang, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs. Ila Casy Deiss, United States Attorn

ANN M. DONNELLY, United States District Judge: *507The plaintiff Wen Dong Zhao brings this action tinder the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, seeking documents from the defendant United States Department of S

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the petition for review is DENIED. Petitioner Chun Guang Dong, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of the August 15, 2006 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. In re Chun Guang Dong, No. A77 297 590 (B.I.A.

665 F.3d 496 (2011) Silvia Moreno GARCIA; CLAUDIA MORENO GARCIA, Petitioners v. ATTORNEY GENERAL of the UNITED STATES, Respondent. No. 10-1311. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued June 21, 2011. Filed: November 28, 2011. As Amended January 13, 2012. *498 Rosa H. Soy [Argued], Mo

OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. Claudia Moreno Garcia (Claudia) and Silvia Moreno Garcia (Silvia) petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ) rejecting their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT)

69 F.3d 547 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Dr.

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: What is remarkable about this case is that essentially everyone on this court agrees that IIRIRA § 601(a), codified at 8 U.S.C. § 110 l(a)(42)(B), cannot be read to grant per se asylum to spouses. This is remarkable because it is in direct conflict with every other circuit, the BIA, and ten ye

103 F.Supp.2d 70 (2000) MATECO INC. and Celta Agencies, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. M/V ELLI, in rem, her engines, machinery, tackle, in rem, and Pan Ocean Shipping Coo., Ltd.; Panobulk America, Inc., Magna Marine Corp.; John Doe Chartering Corp.; Dongkuk Industries Co., Ltd.; Dongkuk International, Inc.; Perez & Co., Inc., Ocean Stevedores, Inc.; Insurance Companies Nos. 1 through 6; Insurance Company No. 7, and John Doe, in personam, Defen

The County Court’s designation of the defendant as a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law art 6-C; People v Dong V. Dao, 9 AD3d 401, 401-402 [2004]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly assessed 15 points, under risk factor 11, for a history of drug abuse (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1776 WILLIAM REGINALDO RODRIGUES; DEBORA SOARES GOMES RODRIGUES; W.T.S.R., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS

316 S.W.3d 715 (2010) Raul NAVARRO, Doris Navarro, Virgina B. Abney, Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas (A Federally Recognized Indian Tribe), Amarillo Financial Freedom I, LP, Amarillo Financial Freedom, Inc., Americo Acosta, Marquita Adamson, John H. and Dorothy P. Alexander, Raquel Avalos, John G. Alvarado, James R. Bailey, Bill J. and Betty L. Barker, Billy Barnes, Harvey A. and Babara S. Baycroft, Charles L. and Margaret D. Bechtold, Deborah A. Bench,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A KATHLEEN TOMLINSON, Magistrate Judge: Jose Valerio (“Plaintiff’ or “Valerio”) brings this wage and hour action, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated, against Defendants RNC Industries, LLC (“RNC”) and Richard Tonyes (“Tonyes”), in both his individual and professional capacities (collectively, “Defendants”), pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”),