Cases

OPINION JANICE M. HOLDER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., and CORNELIA A. CLARK, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. The plaintiff filed a health care liability action against the defendant. During the pendency of her action, the General Assembly en

933 P.2d 1139 (1997) Maynard JOHNSON, Appellant, v. D. Charlene DORIS, personal representative of the estate of Clifford M. Johnson, Appellee. No. S-6474. Supreme Court of Alaska. March 14, 1997. Hugh G. Wade and Terry J. King, Wade & DeYoung, Anchorage, for Appellant. Robert L. Manley, Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz, Powell & Brundin, Anchorage, for Appell

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KARL JOHNSON, FOR PUBLICATION September 12, 2025 Plaintiff-Appellee,

PER CURIAM: The Texas Supreme Court has resolved the certified questions in this case. In the light of - its answers, we now vacate the district court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings. Plaintiffs, a group of optometrists who leased office space from Wal-Mart. Stores, Inc., in its retail stores," sued Wal-Mart for violations of the Texas Opto

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: The original opinion in this case was filed on August 14, 2014. 1 In that opinion, we affirmed the district court’s judgment of liability under the Texas Optometry Act (“TOA”), Tex. Occ.Code § 351.408(c). We reversed and vacated the district court’s monetary award, however. We held that Ch

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-22-00142-CV __________________ PATRICK D. RIECKE, Appellant V. DORIS RIECKE, Appellee _________________________________________________

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: This case of first impression calls upon us to interpret and apply the Texas Optometry Act. Wal-Mart rented space to optometrists using a standard lease agreement requiring optometrists to make representations in their leases of the projected number of hours their offices would remain open. A jury found Wal-Mart liable for “setting or attempting to

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Claudette Grimes was the supervisor of the accounts payable department of Continental Grain Company, and had access to blank checks belonging to her employer. In October of 1988 Grimes and her friend Doris Johnson-Wilder decided to put this access to *1102 work by embarking

NUMBER 13-01-448-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

CHEN, Circuit Judge. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) appeals a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) holding that Diagnostic Code 7806 under 38 C.F.R. § 4.118 (DC 7806), a diagnostic code for rating disabilities for a skin condition, unambiguously defines a topical corticosteroid treatment as “systemic therapy” rather than “topical t

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT CHATTANOOGA Doris Elaine Johnson, ) Docket No.: 2015-01-0182 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 52073-2015 ) Western Express, ) Judge Thomas Wyatt Employer. ) EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING CLAIM FOR TE

PER CURIAM. Kentrell Feronti Johnson appeals his convictions for the murder and kidnapping of Vincent Binder and his sentence of death. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. We affirm his convictions. We vacate Johnson's sentence of death and remand for the imposition of a life sentence without eligibility for parole based on Johnson's performance

244 S.W.3d 338 (2007) Doris JONES and Billy J. Jones v. Susannah P. JOHNSON. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Jackson. April 18, 2007 Session. July 16, 2007. Permission to Appeal Denied November 19, 2007. Donald A. Donati and William B. Ryan, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellants, Doris Jones and Billy J. Jones. Deana C. Se

*106Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Brad R. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Appellants and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the records and the di

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

627 N.W.2d 359 (2001) In re the Marriage of Audrey C. JOHNSON, Petitioner, Appellant, v. James V. JOHNSON, Respondent. No. C0-00-1654. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. May 29, 2001. *360 Jeffrey D. Skonseng, Krekelberg Law Firm, Fergus Falls, MN, (for appellant). Melinda Lee Hanson, McLarana, Hannaher & Skatvold, Moorhea

LANDRIEU, J., dissents with reasons. hi respectfully dissent. Whether the alleged unreasonably dangerous condition of this stair is a cause-in-fact of an injury is a question of fact, and the plaintiff has sufficient evidence to proceed to trial. The plaintiff can meet her burden of proof on the issue of causation by establishing that it is more probable than not that the defect was a prox

USCA11 Case: 20-13179 Document: 142-1 Date Filed: 05/23/2024 Page: 1 of 14 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-13179 ____________________ DORIS SLOAN, widow of Gurstle Sloan,

TERRI F. LOVE, Judge. _JjThe trial court granted two motions for summary judgment, dismissing all of the defendants and the plaintiff, Brandy D’Angelo, filed this devolutive appeal. The motion to designate contents of record, filed by Ms. D’Angelo, did not include the two motions for summary judgment granted by the trial court or the replies to her oppositions.1 Terry Tedeseo, Inc., one of the ap

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2893 ___________________________ Sease Michael Beard Plaintiff - Appellee v. Doris Falkenrath, Warden, JCCC; Nathan Falter, CO III, JCCC; Carignan, CO I, JCCC; Jeremy Epps