⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Doris J Moore”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003-09-18 · Published · cited 8× · 343 F.3d 881; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19295; 2003 WL 22144429
OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs, Reda Walls and her mother Doris Walls, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company (“Amerisure”) and the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs allege that the injuries Reda received in an automobile accident were
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014-11-19 · Published · cited 0× · 152 So. 3d 1079; 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2780; 2014 WL 6465120
MOORE, J. | CadleRock Joint Venture LP appeals a judgment dismissing, on exceptions of prescription, its suit for a deficiency judgment. For the reasons expressed, we affirm. Factual Background The original borrower, J. Graves Scaffolding Inc., obtained a line of credit from Bank One La. in May 1999. It executed a collateral mortgage note in the principal sum of $500,000
Cantu v. Moorepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2002-09-04 · Published · cited 48× · 90 S.W.3d 821; 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 6431; 2002 WL 2007182
Case Number: 04-01-00524-CV 03/18/2003 Notice sent to Court of Appeals 03/17/2003 Case stored in record room 01/30/2003 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed proceeding denied 12/19/2002 Motion for Rehearing - Filed 12/19/2002 Motion for Rehearing forwarded 12/19/2002 Notice requesting filing fee 12/16/2002 Description of document returned to Supreme Court 12/16/2002 Letter Received 12/05/2002 Petition for Review disposed proceeding denied 10/29/2002 Case forwarded to Court 10/28/2002 Response to P
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024-04-04 · Published · cited 21× · 97 F.4th 1109
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2893 ___________________________ Sease Michael Beard Plaintiff - Appellee v. Doris Falkenrath, Warden, JCCC; Nathan Falter, CO III, JCCC; Carignan, CO I, JCCC; Jeremy Epps
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020-05-01 · Published · cited 56× · 958 F.3d 421
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0131p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RUBY HICKS, Administrator of the Estate of ┐ Quandavier K. Hicks, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,
Moore v. Foyepublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994-08-26 · Published · cited 0× · 646 So. 2d 156; 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 418; 1994 WL 460122
This is a custody case. In February 1992, Michael Moore filed a complaint seeking custody of a minor child born in March 1988. Moore alleged that he is the father of the child, and that Melissa Powell, the mother of the child, was his common law wife. Moore further alleged that he and Melissa lived together until her accidental death in December 1991, and that they "exercised joint care, custody and control over the minor child." Moore alleged that Doris Foye, Melissa's mother,
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT BERNARD WILLIAMS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) WD86437 ) DORIS FALKENRATH, ) Filed: September 26, 2023 Warden, Jefferson City ) Correctional Cen
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2000-12-14 · Published · cited 7× · 35 S.W.3d 210; 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 8447; 2000 WL 1863100
35 S.W.3d 210 (2000) In re GUERRA & MOORE, L.L.P., et al. No. 13-00-452-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. December 14, 2000. *212 Adam Poncio, Valerie Mawi, Law Office of Cerda & Poncio, San Antonio, Carlos L. Guerra, Dori Contreras Garza, McAllen, J. Michael Moore, Guerra & Moore, L.L.P., McAllen, for Relators.<
Rogers v. Moorepublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988-05-13 · Published · cited 0× · 527 So. 2d 122; 1988 WL 67344
This is a boundary line dispute between coterminous landowners in an established subdivision, involving the common line that separates Lot No. 7, owned by the appellant, Doris Ruth Rogers, from Lot No. 8, owned by the appellee, Bonita Moore. Ms. Rogers has owned and lived on her lot since 1969; Ms. Moore moved onto her property in 1973. In 1983, Ms. Rogers, using the correct eastern corners of her lot, built a "bow-shaped" fence that extended several feet onto Ms. Moore's lot. In othe
People v. Moorepublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2021-05-18 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 4/26/21; certified for publication 5/18/21 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- THE PEOPLE, C090220 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 19FE000327) v. JEMONDR
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021-05-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-00558-COA SHELBY BREWER, BY AND THROUGH HER APPELLANTS PARENTS AND NEXT FRIENDS DORIS BREWER AND JASON BREWER; JASON BREWER, INDIVIDUALLY; AND DORIS BREWER, INDIVIDUALLY v. MISSISSIPPI FARM BUREAU CASUALTY APPELLEE INSURANCE COMPANY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/14/2020 TRIAL JUDGE:
Moore v. Wallacepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 1983-12-28 · Published · cited 3× · 663 S.W.2d 903; 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 5542
OPINION Plaintiffs, William A. Moore and wife, Doris B. Moore, appeal from a judgment rendered against them and in favor of defendants, Pioneer National Title Insurance Company, Fidelity Abstract and Title Company, Pat Tinley, Edgar Stephens, Tom Sandlin and Edgar Wallace. By a previous order, this Court dismissed the appeal as to all defendants except Wallace. Appellants filed the transcript twenty-three (23) days late and filed the statement of facts almost t
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2012-09-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 10, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DORIS SHARPHINE HALLIBURTON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dyer County No. 10-CR-296 Russell Lee Moore, Jr., Judge No. W2011-02309-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 17, 2012 The Defendant-Appellant, Doris Sharphine Halliburton, was convicted by a Dyer County ju
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997-04-22 · Published · cited 3× · 692 A.2d 943; 1997 ME 83; 1997 Me. LEXIS 91
CLIFFORD, Justice. [¶ 1] Central Maine Power Company (CMP) appeals from the summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander J.), in favor of the defendant insurers’1 on CMP’s complaint seeking *945a declaratory judgment that the insurers had a duty to indemnify CMP for costs that it incurred in cleaning up envi
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-08-27 · Published · cited 0×
NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE CHIEF JUSTICE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR ROGELIO VALDEZ CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 361-888-0416 (TEL) JUSTICES 361-888-0
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-07-30 · Published · cited 0×
NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE CHIEF JUSTICE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR ROGELIO VALDEZ CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 361-888-0416 (TEL) JUSTICES
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974-07-31 · Published · cited 2× · 498 F.2d 326; 183 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 141; 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7389
PER CURIAM: In March, 1971, Doris Moore of California, Inc., appellant’s predecessor in interest, filed a trademark infringement complaint against Sherry Manufacturing Company, Inc. The issue was settled by consent decree wherein appellee was enjoined from using appellant’s trademark, a pair of bare footprints side-by-side, with the
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007-06-21 · Published · cited 20× · 490 F.3d 1371
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-1208 FISHERMAN’S HARVEST, INC., C. JOE NELSON, JR., DORIS MAE NELSON, VANESSA JO NELSON VALLEJO, VICKIE JO NELSON SALAZAR, and NELSON PLAINTIFFS FISHERMAN’S HARVEST, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and CHILDRESS SEAFOOD, INC., W. F. CHILDRESS, and ALTON LEE KELLY,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-05-08 · Published · cited 0× · 117 A.D.3d 484; 985 N.Y.S.2d 239
Determination of respondent’s appeals board, which affirmed, after a hearing, petitioner’s traffic conviction, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Doris Ling-Cohan, J.], entered July 9, 2013), dismissed, without costs. Respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence (see generally 300 Gra
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-05-08 · Published · cited 0× · 117 A.D.3d 484; 985 N.Y.S.2d 239
Determination of respondent’s appeals board, which affirmed, after a hearing, petitioner’s traffic conviction, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Doris Ling-Cohan, J.], entered July 9, 2013), dismissed, without costs. Respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence (see generally 300 Gra