⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Dorris v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014-02-27 · Published · cited 0× · 753 F.3d 740; 2014 WL 747476; 198 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2521; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3716; 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,028
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Jonathan Dorris, a member of the Arkansas Army National Guard, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing his claim that TXD Services (“TXD”) violated the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”), 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301 et seq., when it terminated Dorris while he was deployed on active duty i
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016-11-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GAMCO ASSET MANAGEMENT INC., Plaintiff, v. iHEARTMEDIA INC., iHEARTCOMMUNICATIONS, INC., BAIN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, THOMAS H. LEE PARTNERS, L.P., ROBERT W. PITTMAN, VINCENTE C.A. No. 12312-VCS PIEDRAHITA, BLAIR HENDRIX, DANIEL G. JONES, OLIVIA SABINE, CHRISTOPHER TEMPLE, DALE W. TREMBLAY and DOUGLAS L. JACOBS, Defendants, -and- CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR HOLDINGS,
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2006-12-19 · Published · cited 1× · 470 F. Supp. 2d 797; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92122; 2006 WL 3759898
470 F.Supp.2d 797 (2006) Karen DORRIS, Plaintiff, v. CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY, INC. GROUP INSURANCE PLAN; Long Term Disability Plan of Cummins Engine Company, Inc., Cummins, Inc.; Connecticut General Life Insurance Company; and Life Insurance Company of North America; Defendants. No. 3:04-0983. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. December 19, 2006.</
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024-12-23 · Published · cited 0×
In the Matter of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., et al., Case No. 1434, Sept. Term 2023, Opinion filed on December 23, 2024, by Berger, J. STATE OF MARYLAND GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT – TREATED WASTEWATER – EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS – NET-ZERO DISCHARGE OF NUTRIENTS – FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENT OF DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS Under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit is required when there is a direct discharge of efflu
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017-05-08 · Published · cited 3× · 259 F. Supp. 3d 767
OPINION & ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge A .truck, filled with millions of dollars’ worth of pharmaceuticals was stolen. The trucking company — Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. (“SRT”) — is at fault. The shipper — Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz") — claims that the pharmaceuticals were worth $8.6 million. A federal statute — the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706 et seq
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO TRIBUS, LLC, ) No. ED107460 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Charles County vs.
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2020-06-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 TN WC 54
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Rachel Ameri, ) Docket No. 2019-06-1769 Employee, ) V. ) Denso Automotive Ohio, Inc., ) State File No. 57967-2019 Employer, ) And ) The Hartford Accident & Indemnity ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer Co., ) Carrier. ) EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER Rachel Ameri asked this Court to order Denso Automotive Ohio to provide another panel of physicians, pay for emergency treatment, and provide temporary d
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019-01-03 · Published · cited 154× · 912 F.3d 887
CLAY, Circuit Judge. *892 Julie McMurtry, Steven Geskey, Shemin Blundell, Dorris Mitchell, Debra Singleton, and Sharon Moffet-Massey (together the "Individual Agency Defendants") appeal the district court's decision denying their Motion to Dismiss ("Motion") based on qualified immunity, in t
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016-04-26 · Published · cited 0×
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-09-21 · Published · cited 52× · 872 F.3d 1094
ORDER These matters are before the court on the Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc filed by appellants Alkon, Frank, Holyoak, Martin, and Schulman in number 15-3228. Upon consideration, the panel grants in part, and only to the extent of the modifications contained in the attached revised Opinion, that part of the request seeking panel rehearing. The Opinion filed on August 23, 2017, is hereby withdrawn, and s
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2016-10-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2016 TN WC 236
FILED October 10, 2016 TN COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 304 Mich. App. 1
GLEICHER, J. Plaintiff, Jeanne Harrison, sustained a quarter-sized forearm burn during thyroid surgery performed by defendant Dr. -William Potthoff at Munson Medical Center, owned by defendant Munson Healthcare, Inc. Postoperatively, Harrison met with a Munson representative to learn the cause of her burn. The representative told her that an electrocautery device called a “Bovie” had created the wound but offered no additional deta
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016-08-02 · Published · cited 24× · 140 A.3d 950; 322 Conn. 291; 2016 Conn. LEXIS 232
ROBINSON, J. The sole issue in this appeal is whether a general contractor that implemented a contractor controlled insurance program (CCIP) to centralize the purchasing of workers' compensation insurance for a major project has "paid compensation benefits" to the employees of its subcontractors, thus entitling it to "principal employer" immunity under General Statutes § 31-291 1
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2016-05-31 · Published · cited 0× · 2016 TN WC 132
FILED M ay 31 , 2016 1N COURI OF WORKERS ' CO IPI NSATIO N
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2018-08-30 · Published · cited 0× · 592 B.R. 112
Hon. Elizabeth W. Magner, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge This matter came before the Court on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Ronald Hof in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee for FoodServiceWarehouse.com, L.L.C. ("FSW"). I. Facts Pride Centric Resources, Inc., f.k.a. Pride Marketing and Procurement, Inc., ("Pride") is a food service equipment collective. Members of Pride forme
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018-07-23 · Published · cited 19× · 326 F. Supp. 3d 375
Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge United States District Court *384Currently pending before the Court are four motions by Plaintiffs and three motions by Defendant to exclude testimony of various witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ,
District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012-02-24 · Published · cited 21× · 845 F. Supp. 2d 824; 2012 WL 602724; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23412
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. AND CRAIG HUTCHINSON, M.D.’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT BADAWIABDELLATIF’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge. In October 2007, Ra
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008-04-21 · Published · cited 63× · 523 F.3d 318; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8652; 2008 WL 1777856
523 F.3d 318 (2008) DIRECTV, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John J. RAWLINS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-1430. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: December 7, 2007. Decided: April 21, 2008. ARGUED: Howard Robert Rubin, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Ray Martin Kline, Raleigh, No
United States Court of International Trade · 2018-02-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 CIT 11; 290 F. Supp. 3d 1348
Kelly, Judge: Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of Labor's ("Department" or "Labor") second remand determination filed pursuant to the court's order in Former Employees of Geokinetics, Inc. v. United States Secretary of Labor , 41 CIT ----, ----,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007-05-04 · Published · cited 73× · 485 F.3d 701; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 10520; 2007 WL 1297018
MESKILL, Circuit Judge: This appeal examines the extent of personal liability of a Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA), 7 U.S.C. *704 § 499e(e), trustee controlling person for entering into a factoring agreement resulting in a loss of trust assets for the trust beneficiaries and whether a