Cases

672 P.2d 702 (1983) 296 Or. 14 GRANT COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Oregon, Respondent On Review, v. Donald R. GUYER and Elva Guyer, His Wife; W.S. Thomas and Wanda L. Thomas, His Wife; Stuart F. Wylde and Cecilia C. Wylde, His Wife; Bobby Casteel and Althea Casteel, His Wife; James Watkins and Audrey Watkins, His Wife; Fernando Lanuza and Edith Lanuza, His Wife; City of John Day; Copap, Inc.; Norene Wohlf

688 S.W.2d 569 (1984) Mike DRISCOLL, Appellant, v. HARRIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT, et al., Appellees. No. B14-84-241CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). November 15, 1984. Rehearing Denied with Opinion February 28, 1985. *571 Marsha L.W. Floyd, Dori A. Wind, Asst. County Attys., Houston, for ap

This suit was brought by the state of Texas and Red River county, as plaintiffs, under article 1991, of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, against Raymond L. Medford, on his bonds as tax collector of Red River county, and the American Indemnity Company, as his surety, as defendants. The original petition was filed on the 31st day of December, 1932, in the district court of Dallas county, Tex., and was transferred on a plea of privilege to Red River county where the suit was tried and

NUMBER 13-14-00207-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JUSTIN OLLE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 117th District Court

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

55 F.3d 956 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1577 Norman W. SWANSON; William H. Talbert; Robert B. Campbell;Billy Clark; Charles A. Dancy; Wallace M. Davis; WilliamE. Denton; Galena Elworth; Melvin F. Eyerman; Hamilton M.Howe; Ralph P. Hunt; Henry F. Murray; William E.Nicholson, III; Robert A. Nisbet; John L. Powell, Jr.;Donald V. Wallace; Mary L. Pritchard; Carl L. Whitney;Ira N. Schwarz

SIMONS, Acting P.J. *244Nestled in a cove, sheltered on the north and south by high cliffs, Martins Beach lacks lateral land access.1 The only practical route to Martins Beach is down a road, known as Martins Beach Road, that leads from Highway 1 in San Mateo County to the beach. Appellants are tw

110 Ariz. 88 (1973) 515 P.2d 590 W.P. SHOFSTALL, Superintendent, Arizona Department of Education and Member, State Board of Education; David Weisenborn, President, State Board of Education; Joseph P. Ralston, Maurice A. Marks, Paul P. Kennedy, Dwight Hudson, J. Lawrence Walkup, and O.B. Joy, Members, State Board of Education; Richard L. Harris, Member, State Board of Education and Maricopa County School Superintendent; Ernest Garf

MeGINLEY, Judge. Stanley and Anna Lysicki (the Lysiekis), Howard and Doris Geyser (the Geysers), and Robert J. and Eileen M. Gesk (the Gesks) (collectively, Appellants) appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (common pleas court) that sustained the preliminary objections of the Montour School District (School District). Appellants are the owners of three tracts of property lo

954 S.W.2d 811 (1997) Mary CAMACHO, et al., and Frederick S. Timmons, et al., Appellants, v. Leo SAMANIEGO, et al., Appellees. No. 08-95-00329-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. August 21, 1997. Rehearing Overruled October 29, 1997. *814 Joseph (Sib) Abraham, Jr., James O. Darnell, Grambling, Darnell, L.L.P.

780 P.2d 650 (1988) Tony Lee ADAIR, et al., Appellants, v. Cheryl CLAY, in her capacity as Assessor, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, et al., Appellees. No. 66296. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. July 5, 1988. Supplement to Opinion June 27, 1989. As Corrected June 29, 1989. Rehearings Denied September 20, 1989. Sneed, La

No. 92-510 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HONTANA 1993 CLAYTON E. DeVOE, Petitioner and Respondent, V. EC DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF THE STATE OF 1 " * MONTANA, MISSOULA COUNTY, and FERN HART, -- ~ ..V>[ C L L , ~ rt ~

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge, United States District Court Plaintiff 'Bakken Residential, LLC (“Bakken”) commenced this action on Oc*817tober 19, 2012, against Cahoon Enterprises, LLC, (“Cahoon”), several weeks after Cahoon declared that it considered a real estate purchase agreem

Filed 8/9/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, A144268 A145176 v. MARTINS BEACH 1, LLC et al., (San Mateo County

On Applications for Rehearing LYONS, Justice. The opinion of July 17, 2009, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor. Helen Kathryn Wheeler and William Newton Phillips, as trustee under the Doris R.H. Phillips Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated February 21, 2001 (“Wheeler/Phillips”), and Southdale, LLC, the plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal from summary j

J. M. Hillman appeals from a judgment of the Jefferson County Circuit Court on his counterclaim against Douglas Engineering Company, Inc. (hereinafter "DEC"). As to the counterclaim, that judgment awarded him $18.45 for his 15 shares of stock in DEC and assessed a statutory penalty of 10% of that amount against DEC on the basis that it had failed or refused to allow Hillman to inspect its corporate records; it afforded Hillman no further relief. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and

761 A.2d 56 (2000) 361 Md. 258 David Reginald HERON v. Veronica STRADER, et al. No. 13, Sept. Term, 2000. Court of Appeals of Maryland. October 17, 2000. *57 Philip B. Zipin (Stephani L. Hillman of Gagliardo & Zipin, on brief), Silver Spring, for petitioner. Marc E. Curry, Associate County Atty.

WESLEY, Circuit Judge. Defendants Timothy J. Rigas and John J. Rigas (“Defendants”) appeal from a judgment of conviction following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sand, J.). Defendants were convicted of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to make and cause to be made false statements in filings with the SEC, an

385 S.E.2d 157 (1989) William M. FLOTO, Peggy V. Floto, and Steven M. Floto, Plaintiffs, v. PIED PIPER RESORT, INC., Devos Enterprises, Inc., Marvin J. Devos, Sylvia Devos, Marvin Devos and Gladys Devos, Defendants. No. 8930SC5. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 7, 1989. *158 James L. Blomeley, Jr., Andrews, for plaint

136 Ill. App.3d 640 (1985) 483 N.E.2d 587 DORI LUSINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOMINICK'S FINER FOODS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 84-1588. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division). Opinion filed September 9, 1985. Larry D. Drury, Ltd., of Chicago, for appellant. Kirkland & Ellis, of Chicago (Sidney N.