Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dougherty v. Saul”
Saul v. Rittlepublic domain
Orders affirmed.
308 F.3d 286 Catherine Natsu LANNING; Altovise Love; Belinda Kelly Dodson; Denise Dougherty; Lynne Zirilliv.SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("SEPTA"); Richard Evans, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief of SEPTA Police DepartmentUnited States of Americav.Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCatherine Natsu Lanning; Altovise Love; Belinda Kelly Dodson; Denise Dougherty and Lynne Z
Dougherty v. Rockaway Operating Co.public domain
May, J. The basis of the complaint of the individual plaintiff is that he is a tenant of the defendant and that the latter, by its acts and policy, has denied to him the fair and reasonable right of access to which he is entitled for himself, his guests and his invitees, *808in that the defendant has prevented him from freely bringing in, or having brought in to him at de
Fine v. Saulpublic domain
Gilbert, Justice. A. D. Fine and Mrs. Jacob Silver, beneficiaries of a trust estate created by the will of their mother, Mrs. Gertrude Fine, filed a petition in equity against J. Saul, one of the trustees, and Travelers Insurance Company. The allegations 'of the petition, other than those shown in the opinion, are substantially as follows. The plaintiffs’ mother, Mrs. Gertrude Fine, died in the year 1929, and her will was probate
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Saulpublic domain
1. This court in the former appearance of this case here ruled that the petition as amended was not "subject to any of the grounds of the demurrer, except those relating to the claim for attorney's fees and damages." This ruling covered the judgment of the trial court in overruling the special as well as the general demurrers, to which exceptions were duly and properly taken in the record then before the court. Accordingly, an assignment of error now presented, on rulings excepted to pendente
181 F.3d 478 (3rd Cir. 1999) CATHERINE NATSU LANNING; ALTOVISE LOVE; BELINDA KELLY DODSON; DENISE DOUGHERTY; LYNNE ZIRILLIv.SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA); (D.C. CIVIL NO. 97-CV-00593)UNITED STATES OF AMERICAv.SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (D.C. CIVIL NO. 97-CV-01161) CATHERINE NATSU LANNING, ALTOVISE LOVE, BELINDA KELLY DODSON, DENISE DOUGHTERY AND LYNNE ZIRILLI, APPELLANTS IN NO
474 F.2d 416 154 U.S.App.D.C. 168, 98 P.U.R.3d 209 TEXACO, INC., Petitioner,v.FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent, Mrs. James R.Dougherty, et al., Intervenors.CONSOLIDATED GAS SUPPLY CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent, Mrs. James R.Dougherty et al., Intervenors.James M. FORGOTSON, Sr., an Independent Natural GasProducer, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL POWER
Jeffrey Wiest v. Thomas Lynchpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 11-4257 _____________ JEFFREY A. WIEST; LAURA E. WIEST, HIS WIFE, Appellants v. THOMAS J. LYNCH, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Tyco Electronics Corporation; TERRENCE CURTIN, Executive Vice President and Chief Financia
Pennsylvania State EduCation Ass'n ex rel. Wilson v. Commonwealth, Department of Community & Economic Developmentpublic domain
OPINION JUSTICE DONOHUE This case involves an examination of the scope of the “personal security” exception to disclosure under the Right to Know Law (“RTKL”), 65 P.S. §§ 67.101-67.3104, and, more specifically, whether school districts must disclose the home addresses of public school employees. Under the prior Right to Know Act, 65 P.S. §§ 66.1-66.4 (repealed, effective January 1, 2009) (“RTKA”), this Court had
Conley v. United Statespublic domain
332 F.Supp.2d 302 (2004) Kenneth M. CONLEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. No. CIV.A.01-10853-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 18, 2004. *303 *304 Robert S. Bennett, Thomas J. Dougherty, Saul M. Pilchen, Jonice Gray Tucker, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &a;
Conley v. United Statespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 04-2424 KENNETH M. CONLEY, Petitioner, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]
Monroe v. FTS USA, LLCpublic domain
763 F.Supp.2d 979 (2011) Edward MONROE, Fabian Moore, and Timothy Williams, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated employees, Plaintiffs, v. FTS USA, LLC, and UniTek USA, LLC, Defendants. Case No. 2:08-cv-2100. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. February 7, 2011. *982 Donald A. Donat
Monroe v. FTS USA, LLCpublic domain
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING MOTION TO CONDITIONALLY CERTIFY CLASS BERNICE B. DONALD, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification. (D.E.# 36.) The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation. On February 23, 2009, the Magistrate Judge entered his Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed. Upon a de no
Kenneth Conley v. United Statespublic domain
323 F.3d 7 Kenneth CONLEY, Petitioner, Appellee,v.UNITED STATES of America, Respondent, Appellant. No. 01-2693. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard December 3, 2002. Decided March 6, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED S. Theodore Merritt, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Michael
Ferguson v. CSX Transportationpublic domain
36 F.Supp.2d 253 (1999) Ronald T. FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 97-3945. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 25, 1999. Lawrence R. Cohan, Thomas R. Anapol, Anapol, Schwartz, Weiss & Schwartz, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Joseph M. Dougherty, II, Springfield, PA, for Ronald T. Ferguson, plaintiff. John J
Transcontinental Technical Services, Inc. v. Allenpublic domain
642 N.E.2d 981 (1994) TRANSCONTINENTAL TECHNICAL SERVICES, Inc.; Transportation Insurance Company; and Cna Insurance Companies, Appellant-Defendants, v. Corbett ALLEN and Ruth Allen, Appellee-Plaintiffs. No. 45A04-9404-CV-128. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District. November 15, 1994. Transfer Denied March 9, 1995.
Opinions of the United 2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-15-2002 Lanning v. SEPTA Precedential or Non-Preceden
Velasquez, L., Aplt v. Miranda, L.public domain
[J-45-2024] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. LICELY JUAREZ VELASQUEZ, : No. 108 MAP 2023 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the Superior
Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. Eckerd Corp.public domain
162 S.W.3d 261 (2005) TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY//Cross-Appellants, Eckerd Corporation; H.E. Butt Grocery Company; Third Party Solutions, Inc.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; Apollo Enterprises, Inc.; and Walgreen Company, Appellant, v. ECKERD CORPORATION; H.E. Butt Grocery Company; Third Party Solutions, Inc.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; Apollo Enterprises, Inc.; and Walgreen Company//Cross-Appellee, Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees.
Ehrenreich v. Israelpublic domain
Ehrenreich v Israel (2020 NY Slip Op 06499) Ehrenreich v Israel 2020 NY Slip Op 06499 Decided on November 12, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic