Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 19, 2025 NO. 03-25-00142-CV Andrew Toscano, Appellant v. Kimberly D. Brown and Douglas Welch, Appellees APPEAL FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, KELLY, AND THEOFANIS AFFI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-25-00142-CV Andrew Toscano, Appellant v. Kimberly D. Brown and Douglas Welch, Appellees FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. C2016-1830D, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

WHATLEY, Acting Chief Judge. Benjamin Welch appeals the final judgment of dissolution of his marriage to Anna Welch. He raises several issues in this appeal, but we find merit only in his argument regarding the trial court’s disposition of the parties’ joint savings account. In the order granting Anna’s motion for temporary alimony, the trial court found that at the time of separation, Anna removed the $3

PER CURIAM. Appellant appeals the trial court's denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for postconviction relief in Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2008-CF-000699-AO. We affirm the trial court's order and caution Appellant that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to the identified lower court case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and

PER CURIAM. Appellant appeals the trial court's denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for postconviction relief in Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2008-CF-000699-AO. We affirm the trial court's order and caution Appellant that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to the identified lower court case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2025 ME 68 Docket: Yor-24-218 Argued: October 9, 2024 Decided: July 29, 2025 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. Majority: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. Dissent: HORTON, J. KATRINA M. WELCH v. NAOMI

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Plaintiffs Donald Welch, Anthony Duk, and Aaron Bitzer seek to enjoin enforcement of Senate Bill 1172 (“SB 1172”), which prohibits mental health providers in California from engaging in sexual orientation change efforts (“SOCE”) with minors. The court previously granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preli

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Plaintiffs Donald Welch, Anthony Duk, and Aaron Bitzer seek to enjoin enforcement of Senate Bill 1172 (“SB 1172”), which if it goes into effect on January 1, 2013, will prohibit mental health providers from engaging in sexual orientation change efforts (“SOCE”) with minors. Becau

199 Ga. App. 269 (1991) 404 S.E.2d 450 WELCH v. DOUGLAS COUNTY. A90A1696. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided March 11, 1991. Rehearing Denied March 26, 1991. *271 Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, James T. McDonald, Jr., R. Briggs Peery, for appellant. Drew, Eckl &

OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: Once again, we consider facial constitutional challenges to California’s law prohibiting state-licensed mental health providers from engaging in “sexual orientation change efforts” (“SOCE”) with minor patients. The law is known as Senate Bill 1172, or SB 1172, and is codified in California’s Business and Professions Code

536 F.3d 269 (2008) David E. WELCH, CPA, Petitioner, v. Elaine L. CHAO, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Respondent, Cardinal Bankshares Corporation, Intervenor-Respondent. Government Accountability Project; National Whistleblower Center; Taxpayers Against Fraud, Amici Supporting Petitioner, American Association of Bank Directors; Virginia Association of Community Banks; Virginia Bankers Association, Amici Suppor

JAMES K. PREWITT, Presiding Judge. The marriage of the parties was dissolved on September 25,1991, and primary physical custody of parties’ child, Ashley, was awarded to Appellant. On February 3, 1994, the dissolution decree was modified, granting primary physical custody to Respondent. Thereafter, on July 9, 1997, Appellant filed a motion to modify, requesting primary custody of Ashley. Following trial of the matter, Appell

Opinion ROBIE, J. In this case, we chronicle a schoolteacher’s more than decade-long trip through a bureaucratic maze created by California’s State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS), which for years misinformed her and other applicants for disability retirement of the applicable eligibility requirements. In October 1998, plaintiff Melanie Welch was attacked by a group of students while work

401 F.Supp.2d 1172 (2005) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff, v. Douglas WELCH, Defendant. No. 05-20033 JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. November 18, 2005. *1173 Kim I. Martin, Office of United States Attorney, Kansas City, KS, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LUNGSTRUM, District Jud

293 F.3d 213 Ricardo Antonio WELCH, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee,v.John ASHCROFT, as Attorney General, Department of Justice; James W. Ziglar, as Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice; Louis D. Crocetti, Jr., as Director, Baltimore District, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Douglas C. Devenyns, as Warden, Wicomico County Detention Center, Respondents-Appellants.Citizens and Immigrants for E

WIDENER, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the result reached in the opinion of Judge Beezer, which is the decision of the court. I concur in all of the opinion of Judge Beezer except the first paragraph of Part III A. 1. of the opinion which is found on page 8 of the circulated slip opinion, and the penultimate sentence of the text of the opinion found in Part VI thereof on page 22 o

2025 IL App (1st) 231116 No. 1-23-1116 Fifth Division September 26, 2025 _____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS

990 S.W.2d 876 (1999) Tommy WELCH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 09-97-324CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted April 1, 1999. Decided April 14, 1999. Rehearing Overruled May 13, 1999. *877 Douglas M. Barlow, Beaumont, for appellant. Mark Mullin, Special Pros

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979). MINER, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.

(2008) VDP PATENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. WELCH ALLYN HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 5821 (GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 24, 2008. Michael B. Weiss, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NY, for plaintiff. Douglas J. Nash and John D. Cook, Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, Syracuse, NY, for defendants. OPI