Cases

184 F.Supp.2d 402 (2002) Gregory TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. PROCTER & GAMBLE DOVER WIPES, Defendant. No. Civ.A.00-593-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 6, 2002. *403 *404 James E. Liguori, Liguori, Morris & Redding, Dover, DE, of counsel, Olugbenga O. Abiona, Solo Pra

ACCEPTED 14-14-00345-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:02:41 P

Motion for En Banc Rehearing in Cause No Motion for En Banc Rehearing in Cause No. 14-00-00173-CV Granted, Opinion of August 23, 2001 Withdrawn and Consolidated for En Banc Review with Cause No. 14-00-00580-CV; Judgment in Cause No. 14-00-00173-CV Affirmed, Judgment in Cause No. 14-00-00580-CV Reversed and Remanded, and Majority and

842 F.2d 1496 46 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 610,47 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,126Paul LILLY, individually and on behalf of all otherssimilarly situated; Christopher McKinney; Phillip Reed;John Legrand; Ken Bailey; Frank Sullivan; James Mobley;Shirley Gatewood; Jerome Gary; Curtis Jones; WoodrowMcManus; Roy Torrence; Hazel Fisher; John Johnson;Willie Hunt; Roosevelt Patterson; Willie Covington;William Carrothers; T

984 F.Supp. 160 (1997) The STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. SOLVENT CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., ICC Industries, Inc., Mader Capital Corporation, 3163 Buffalo Avenue Corporation, and Corigan Sanoian, Individually and d/b/a Quad Technologies, Inc., Defendants. SOLVENT CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., ICC Industries, Inc., and Mader Capital Corporation, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, E.I. Dupont De Nemours and

OPINION & ORDER Paul A. Engelmayer, United States District Judge Plaintiff Hadami, S.A. (“Hadami”) brings this lawsuit against defendant Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, gross negligence, fraud, and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage. Ha-dami, a Paraguayan corporation, claims that it entered into an a

685 F.Supp.2d 357 (2010) The State of NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. SOLVENT CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., and ICC Industries, Inc., Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Olin Corporation and E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Third-Party Defendants. No. 83-CV-1401-JTC. United States District Court, W.D. New York. January 26, 2010. *361<

525 F.Supp.2d 1200 (2007) MULTIMEDIA PATENT TRUST, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Gateway Inc., Gateway, Professional LLC, Gateway Companies, Inc., Gateway Manufacturing LLC, Gateway Direct, Inc., Gateway U.S. Retail, Inc., and Dell Inc., Defendants. Microsoft Corporation, Gateway Inc., Gateway Professional LLC, Gateway Companies, Inc., Gateway Manufacturing LLC, Gateway Direct, Inc., Gateway U.S. Retail, Inc., and Dell Inc., Countercla

191 S.W.3d 362 (2006) Francis SHARPE, Appellant, v. Windle TURLEY, Appellee. No. 05-04-01521-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. March 23, 2006. Rehearing Overruled May 25, 2006. *363 John E. Wall, Jr., Law Offices of John E. Wall, Jr., Dallas, for Appellant. Thomas B. Cowart, Turley Law Firm, Dallas, f

632 F.Supp. 1225 (1986) NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Norfolk Southern Marine Services, Inc., Lamberts Point Barge Co., Inc., Coastal Barge Corporation, Coal Logistics Corporation, and Coastal Carriers Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Charles M. OBERLY, III, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, and John E. Wilson, III, Secretary, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control of the State of Delaware, Defendants, Delaware Saltwate

STRIÑE, Chief Justice, dissenting, with SEITZ, Justice, joining: I. We respectfully, dissent. To begin to explain why, we underscore what this case is about. The Majority sets aside a forty-year-old policy of the Division of Parks and Recreation of the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental

416 F.Supp.2d 568 (2006) METZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNIZAN BANK, et al., Defendant, No. 5:05CV1510. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 24, 2006. *569 James B. Kenney, Keller & Kehoe, Robert D. Kehoe, Gretchen T. Seymour, Kehoe & Associates, LLC, Daniel G. Morris, Cleveland, OH, for Plain

977 S.W.2d 403 (1998) GXG, INC., Appellant, v. TEXACAL OIL & GAS and Ted O'Connor, Appellees. No. 13-96-368-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. June 18, 1998. Rehearing Overruled August 27, 1998. *406 Craig P. Henderson, William L. Wolf, P.C., Michael A. Dover, Dallas, for Appellant. Robert

OPINION Appellant, Theodore Olin Moeller, was employed by Dover Elevator Company when he was struck by a falling elevator. Moeller, now permanently injured, sued multiple defendants, including his employer, the prior and present building owners (including Fort Worth Capital Corporation, appellant), manufacturers of various elevator parts, and directors of the now-dissolved Hunter-Hayes Elevator Company and H. H. Hunter Corporation, companies involved in the installati

MAJORITY OPINION SCOTT BRISTER, Chief Justice. Two personal injury claims emerged from a drilling site in a Louisiana wood. Both followed the strangely well-worn path to trial courts in Texas. There, the tangle of Texas and Louisiana oilfield indemnity statutes led two very experienced trial judges to split results, and produced a similar split in this Court on both appeals. With the help of a specially ap

Armstrong, J. Tufts College, planning construction of several buildings and additions to buildings on its undergraduate campus in Medford1 but unable to reach agreement with the city concerning the application of certain provisions of the Medford zoning ordinance to the proposed construction, brought this action in the Land Court under G. L. c. 240, § 14A, for a determination that the zoning p

610 S.W.2d 857 (1980) Theodore Olin MOELLER, Appellant, v. FORT WORTH CAPITAL CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 18297. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. December 31, 1980. Rehearing Denied January 29, 1981. *858 Thorne, Thorne & Robertson, Inc. and Michael A. Robertson, Grand Prairie, for appellant. <

933 F.Supp. 431 (1996) GOULD INC., Plaintiff, v. A & M BATTERY & TIRE SERVICE, et al., Defendants. No. 3 CV-91-1714. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. July 15, 1996. *432 Dennis R. Suplee, Diana S. Donaldson, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, PA, Jacob P. Hart, Schnader, Harrison, Segal &

133 F.Supp.2d 482 (2001) ALCAN ALUMINUM CORP., Plaintiff, v. BASF CORP. d/b/a Delaware New Corp., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:97-CV-1480-L. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. January 30, 2001. *483 *484 *485

897 So.2d 248 (2004) THOMPSON PROPERTIES 119 AA 370, LTD., and Thompson Properties 123 AA 370, Ltd. v. BIRMINGHAM HIDE AND TALLOW COMPANY, INC. 1021411. Supreme Court of Alabama. July 9, 2004. Rehearing Denied September 17, 2004. *250 David B. Anderson, N. Christian Glenos, and Ryan K. Cochran of Walston, Wells,