Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1407 COUNTY OF COOK, ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distric

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1407 COUNTY OF COOK, ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distric

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE COROPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, Civil Action No. 17-cv-36-LLA-MAU v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION1 After the 2008 financial

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF NEVADA,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; No. 12-15005 BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL D.C. No. ASSOCIATION; BAC HOME LOANS  3:11-cv-00135- SERVICING, LP; RECONSTRUCT RCJ-WGC COMPANY, N.A.; COUNTRYWIDE OPINION FI

OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. The ticker symbol for Cedar Fair Entertainment Company — operator of Cedar Point and other amusement parks — is, fittingly, “FUN,” and it thus reveals littlé about, the nature of the collateral-liquidation dispute presently before us. In April 2008, Richard Kinzel, then CEO of Cedar Fair, borrowed ne

Opinion CORRIGAN, J. May a claim of unlawful business practice under California’s unfair competition law be based on violations of a federal statute after Congress has repealed a provision of that statute authorizing civil actions for damages? We hold that it may when Congress has also made it plain that state laws consistent with the federal statute are not

Filed 5/31/22 Separate opinion from 2/23/22 opinion CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Lassen) ---- JAY DOW, as Trustee, etc., C091965 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct.

SUA SPONTE REMAND ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., Senior District Judge. This case will be remanded to the state court from which Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) removed it, since BAÑA has not established that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. BAÑA removéd this case from the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, asserting in its Notice of Rem

OSCN Found Document:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. ASH OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research

WM. C. HETHERINGTON, JR., Chief Judge. §1 Defendant Michael Ash (Ash) seeks review of the trial court judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. (Bank) on its foreclosure petition describing real estate situated in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Ash challenges Bank's standing to pursue the action and its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. We r

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER 12(b)(6) ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. Presently before the Court is a motion to remand (Doc No. 10), filed by Plaintiffs Sean M. Park and Michelle Park (jointly referred to as “Plaintiffs”), and a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 15) filed by Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. OVERVIEW Today’s dispute is part, of the fallout from the financial, system’s near meltdown in the late 2000s. On one side of- this dispute is Tutor Perini Corporation (“Tutor Perini”). On the other side is Banc of America Securities LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (“BAS” and “BANA,” respectively). To hear Tutor Perini tell it, BAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. In this employment action, Plaintiff Veronica Graves alleges discrimination and retaliation in violation of both the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12111 et seq., and the North Carolina Equal Employment Practices Act, N.C. GemStat. § 143-422.1 et seq. Before the court is Defendant’s motion f

672 F.3d 661 (2012) State of NEVADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; Bank of America National Association; BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP; Reconstruct Company, N.A.; Countrywide Financial Corporation; Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.; Full Spectrum Lending, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 12-15005. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitt

18-1079 Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. v. Bank of America N.A. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ______________ August Term, 2018 (Argued: June 26, 2019 Decided: August 11, 2020) Docket N

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 11-­‐‑2989 MARGARET RICHEK GOLDBERG, as Trustee under the Seymour Richek Revocable Trust, on behalf of a class, Plaintiff-­‐‑Appella

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIM LAKE, District Judge. Defendants Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) (collectively, “Defendants”) removed this action from the 190th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, where it was filed under Cause No. 2012-29812. Pending before the court is Plaintiff Melvina S. Goffney’s (“Goffney”) Motion to Rem

675 F.Supp.2d 266 (2009) Bruce J. TROMBLEY and Ryan Sukaskas v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION. Civil No. 08-cv-456-JD. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. December 23, 2009. *267 Peter N. Wasylyk, Attorney at Law, Providence, RI, Michael J. Quirk, Williams Cuker Berezofsky, Philadelphia, PA, for Bruce J. Trombley, Ryan S

Opinion issued March 1, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The

*866 OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we address whether Defendants-Appellants (Defendants) properly removed a 137-plaintiff action from state court to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), Pub.L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005). We also co