Cases

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY * Bobby M. Ellis, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his second 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction. We deny a COA and dismiss the mat

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge. On April 3, 2012, Plaintiff Sergeant Gary A. Stein (“Plaintiff’ or “Stein”) filed a complaint against Defendants, along with an ex parte motion for temporary restraining order and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. (Doc. Nos. 1 & 2.) Plai

PROST, Circuit J. The petitioner, Edward Dowling, asks this court to review the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“the Board”) granting the appeal of the Office of Personnel Management .(“OPM”) arid rejecting his request that his active duty military service be counted towards his Civil Service Retirement System (“CSRS”) retirement annuity. Dowling

SEVERSON, Justice. [¶ 1.] Midland Farms, LLC, appeals the circuit court’s denial of its request for restitution from Dowling Family Partnership and Dowling Brothers Partnership (collectively, “the Partnerships”). Midland asserts that the Partnerships were unjustly enriched by receiving the proceeds from a winter wheat crop planted at the partial expense of a third party. The Par

OPINION OF THE COURT Buckley, P.J. The proposed intervenors seek to resuscitate an expired action, already tried to final judgment, and to metamorphose it into an entirely new matter, entailing different facts, subsequently enacted statutes, and novel legal theories. This class action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief was commenced in 1987, on behalf of recipients of publi

995 F.Supp. 1188 (1998) Mark Edward DOWLING Plaintiff, v. Robert HANNIGAN, et al., Defendants. No. 94-3467-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 30, 1998. *1189 Robert J. Hoffman, Nilesh Patel, Bryan Cave LLP, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff. Lawrence J. Logback, William Scott Hesse, Hsing Kan Chiang, Office

968 F.Supp. 610 (1997) Mark Edward DOWLING, Plaintiff, v. Robert HANNIGAN, et al., Defendants. No. 94-3467-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 25, 1997. Mark Edward Dowling, Lansing, KS, pro se. Lawrence J. Logback, Hsing Kan Chiang, Office of Attorney General, Kansas Judicial Center, Topeka, KS, Memorandum and Order

862 F.Supp. 793 (1994) Gerald EINAUGLER, M.D., Plaintiff, v. Michael J. DOWLING, Commissioner, New York State Department of Social Services, James P. White, Director, Bureau of Program Integrity, Office of Quality Assurance and Audit, New York State Department of Social Services, Donna Shalala, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Linda Little, Regional Inspector General, United States Department of Health and H

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13893 ARCANGELO CELLA & others1 vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL & another.2 Suffolk.

[J-70-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 795 CAP : Appellant : Appeal from the Order entered on : February 22, 2022 in

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this

Filed 11/18/16 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE LAURA ESMERELDA CONTRERAS, A142646 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (San Francisco County

Opinion JONES, P. J. This case is before us for a third time. In this latest chapter, Curtis Dowling, a lawyer employed by the firm of Beckman, Marquez & Dowling (collectively Dowling), appeals from an order of the superior court denying his special motion to strike the complaint filed against him by

Matter of Dowling v Gardner (2021 NY Slip Op 05380) Matter of Dowling v Gardner 2021 NY Slip Op 05380 Decided on October 7, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau purs

Jones, P.J. *778This case is before us for a third time. In this latest chapter, Curtis Dowling, a lawyer employed by the firm of Beckman, Marquez & Dowling (collectively Dowling), appeals from an order of the superior court denying his special motion to strike the complaint filed against him by respondent Laura Esmerelda Contreras. (Code C

Error: Bad annotation destination United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-3040 EDWARD J. DOWLING, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. William Lafferty, Lafferty & Lafferty, of Burlin

ELMORE, Judge. The seminal issue before this Court is whether the trial court erred in granting the United Way of Haywood County, Inc., Celesa Willett, Michael Clinton (collectively the United Way defendants), and Victoria Young’s motions for summary judgment. The other named defendants have since settled their involvement in this matter. After careful consideration, we affirm. I. Background

Matter of Dowling v Venettozzi (2019 NY Slip Op 07977) Matter of Dowling v Venettozzi 2019 NY Slip Op 07977 Decided on November 07, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur

[Cite as Dowling v. Ohio Casino Control Comm., 2022-Ohio-2698.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Arthur Dowling, : Appellant-Appellant, : No. 21AP-646 (C.P.C. No. 21CV-3405) v. :

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2141 LAKENISHA DOWLING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.