Cases

NICKELL, JUDGE: This cause comes before the Court on Appellee Jonathan Drake's motion to dismiss the appeal. Having reviewed the record, and being otherwise sufficiently advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that *199the motion to dismiss shall be, and hereby is, GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Appellee Jonathan Drak

DECISION AND ORDER HONORABLE MICHAEL A. TELESCÁ, United’ States District. Judge I. Introduction Maleesha Harris (“Plaintiff’), represented by counsel, brings this action pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act, challenging the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The

Justice PARRISH, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION T1 While returning to Utah from a work project in Maryland, Kelly Colvin was killed in an automobile accident. Joseph Giguere, Colvin's coworker, was driving the vehicle in which Colvin was a passenger when the accident occurred. Colvin's widow and son brought this action against Gi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PAUL L. ABRAMS, United States Magistrate Judge. I. PROCEEDINGS Staci D. Hardy (“plaintiff’), on behalf of her minor daughter J.M.H-B., filed this action on January 17, 2012, seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of J.M.H-B.’s *1199applications for Child’s In

Weiss, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Mercure, J.), entered December 4, 1987 in Schenectady County, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. This action was commenced on behalf of plaintiff Eric O. Thomas (hereinafter plaintiff) for personal injuries allegedly sustained when the infant was struck in the left leg by a tractor trailer on February 11, 1985 while

524 N.E.2d 337 (1988) Kenneth L. DRAKE, Defendant-Appellant, v. Eddie LAWRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 64A03-8707-CV-173. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District. June 13, 1988. Rehearing Denied July 27, 1988. *338 Donald W. Pagos, Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue & Thorne, Michigan City, for defendant-appella

MEMORANDUM James K. Bredar, United States District Judge Dianne K. Van Rossum (“Plaintiff’) brought an action against her former employer, Baltimore County, Maryland (“Defendant”), alleging that Defendant (through its agents) violated provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. Now pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summar

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents an issue of first impression in this circuit: whether the district court abused its discretion by denying, as time-barred, Zosimo Reyes Saenz’s motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, rather than deciding whether, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, to allow the amendment. Saenz, federal prisoner # 274

469 F.Supp.2d 1016 (2006) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs-Intervenors, United States of America, Plaintiff, v. The State of ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. CV-83-M-1676-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. December 12, 2006. *1017

474 So.2d 1063 (1985) Leann BELCHER v. JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: Betsy Faucette, Harriett Gwin, Kevin Walsh, Mary Buckelew, Bill Mewbourne, individually and as members of the Jefferson County Board of Education; and Kenneth Abbott, individually and as principal of Hewitt-Trussville High School and Henry Allen GRAHAM v. JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; Betsy Faucette; Harriett Gwin; Kevin Walsh; Mary Buckelew; Bill Mewbo

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Jeffrey Hofsommer brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying his claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act (the "Act"). Bo

f 136. MICHAEL J. GABLEMAN, J. (concurring). I agree with the lead opinion that the criminal history reports that are at issue in this case are inaccurate as a matter of law under Wis. Stat. § 19.70. I further agree that DOJ is required to correct the inaccurate information. I therefore join part of the lead opinion1 *526</

GARRETT,. J. | ,The defendant, UniFirst Corporation (“UniFirst”), appeals from a trial court judgment granting a preliminary injunction against arbitration in favor of the plaintiff, Fluid Disposal Specialties, Inc. (“Fluid”), and denying UniFirst’s exception of prematurity. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment. INTRODUCTION The narrow issues presented by this app

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cou

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 24-CV-0273 MATTHEW BARE, APPELLANT, V. RAINFOREST ALLIANCE, IN

315 Ga. 408 FINAL COPY S22A0891. THE STATE v. KENNEY. COLVIN, Justice. A Fulton County grand jury indicted Michael Jerome Kenney for malice murder and related offenses in connection with the shooting death of Laquitta Brown (“Laquitta”).1 Before trial, Kenney moved in limine to exclude hearsay statements that Sharrie Dixon, a witness present during the shooting who was unavailable to testify at trial, allegedly made to Aisha Brown (“Aisha”),

458 F.Supp.2d 1273 (2006) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Intervenors, United States of America Plaintiff, v. The State of ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. CV-83-M-1676-. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama. October 5, 2004. *1275 Alice H. Martin, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Birm

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Suprem

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CAROL ANN LUTHER, No. 16-55987 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:15-cv-03356- JLS-JEM NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

919 N.E.2d 1162 (2010) GRABILL CABINET COMPANY, INC., Appellant/Plaintiff, v. Debra C. SULLIVAN, Appellee/Defendant. No. 02A03-0908-CV-399. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 14, 2010. *1164 Robert W. Eherenman, Melanie L. Farr, Haller & Colvin, P.C., Fort Wayne, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. John R. Burns, Kyle B. Os