Cases

CALABRIA, Judge. Susan Sanders Barbour (“Barbour”), Stewart 1996 Family Limited Partnership, Neuse Tree Farm, LLC, and E. Wayne Stewart, Trustee of the Velma H. Stewart Irrevocable Trust (collectively “plaintiffs”) appeal from the final judgment of the trial court. The trial court’s judgment granted plaintiffs easements implied by prior use and by necessity, but limited the scope of their uses, and additionally denied plaintiff

This Court granted the petition of Luther Stanley Pate IV for a writ of certiorari in order to review whether the Court of Civil Appeals erred in affirming the trial court's ruling in favor of Reginald Watkins in an action to recover workers' compensation benefits. Watkins sued Transamerican Properties, Inc.; Transamerican Equipment Company, *Page 428 Inc.; Pate Companies; and three fictitiously named defendants, seeking to recover workers'

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 5, 2008 Session DON DRAKE ET AL. v. JANA M. WILLIAMS, M.D., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 05C-2513 Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr., Judge No. M2007-00979-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 25, 2008 The parents of a young man who committed suicide after bei

May 17, 1943. The respondent, Z.V. Pate, Inc., instituted its action for the foreclosure of a mortgage given it covering the right, title and interest of one, C.N. Kollock, in and to certain lands known as the "Sand Hill Lands" and "Bennettsville Lands" of Nicholas Kollock (deceased), the father of C.N. Kollock, also deceased at the time of the commencement of the foreclosure action. Those originally made parties-defendants were the mother and the brothers and sisters of the said mortg

64 Mich. App. 671 (1975) 236 N.W.2d 537 PEOPLE v. DRAKE Docket No. 18676. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 13, 1975. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, E. Brady Denton, Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael J. McNamee, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

It is clear that there is no foundation in the evidence for any recovery, under any count of the complaint, against the defendant Osborn. He merely sold to plaintiff his contract for the purchase of the land from the defendant Nunn, and he was guilty of no deceit, either actively or passively, with respect to the incumbrances complained of; nor was he guilty of any breach of warranty or of contractual obligation. So far as he was concerned, the rule of caveat emptor must be applied to plainti

202 A.2d 786 (1964) CLIFTON D. MAYHEW, INC., Appellant, v. Jack L. PATE, Appellee. No. 3478. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued May 25, 1964. Decided July 31, 1964. John B. Kneipple, Washington, D. C., for appellant. J. Bernard Flaherty, Washington, D. C., for appellee. Before HOOD, Chief Judge, and QUINN and MYERS, Associat

90 A.2d 460 (1952) MAC MOTOR SALES, Inc. v. PATE. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. June 27, 1952. *461 Charles A. Pomeroy, J. Joseph Tansey, Portland, for plaintiff. William H. Stone, Edwin G. Walker, Biddeford, for defendant. Before MURCHIE, C. J., and THAXTER, FELLOWS, MERRILL, NULTY and WILLIAMSON, JJ. MERRILL, Justice.

This is an appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county by the *Page 319 plaintiff in error, George Pate, who was plaintiff below. Plaintiff instituted this action for recovery for personal injuries which he received on the 4th day of April, 1930. The record discloses that the plaintiff and four associates had been to a ball game at Crescent, and while returning in a Ford car driven by one of his associates had a collision with a car driven by the de

This appeal involves the sole question whether the unmatured installments of a judgment rendered against an insurance carrier in an appeal from an award of the Industrial Accident Board are provable claims against the estate of such insurance carrier in administration under receivership. The controlling facts, which are undisputed, follow: Pate recovered judgment against the insurance carrier, upon a special issue verdict trial, for compensation for 189 weeks total disability at

Hammond, J. — The appellant, claiming to be the owner in fee simple of the undivided one-third of certain described real,estate in Ohio county, brought this action against the appellees to quiet her title, and for possession and partition. The appellees answered in two paragraphs. The first was the general denial. The appellant demurred to the second; her demurrer was overruled; exception was taken to the rul

PER CURIAM. Michael James Drake Stewart, Appellant, challenges his conviction and sentence for attempted voluntary manslaughter. Appellant presents five issues on appeal. We affirm as to four of those issues without further discussion. We affirm as to the remaining issue based on the authority of Moore v. State, 78 So.3d 118, 118 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (rejecting the appellant’s claim that attempted voluntary manslaughte

673 So.2d 422 (1995) TRANSAMERICAN PROPERTIES, INC., et al. v. Reginald WATKINS. AV93000766. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. March 3, 1995. Rehearing Denied March 24, 1995. *423 Jack Drake of Drake & Pierce, Tuscaloosa, for Luther Stanley Pate IV. Nat Bryan of Pittman, Hooks, Marsh, Dutton & Hol

After Remand from the Supreme Court The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion of August 25, 1995, 673 So.2d 427 (Ala. 1995), the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion. REVE

JAMES F. McKAY III, Chief Judge. 1 defendants, the Housing Authority of New Orleans (“HANO”), Guste Homes Resident Management Corporation (“Guste”), B.W. Cooper Resident Management Corporation (“Cooper”), Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Scottsdale”), Jefferson Insurance Company of New York (“Jefferson”), Canal Indemnity Company (“Canal”), Penn-American Insurance Company (“PennAmeriean”), and Odyssey Re (London) Limited, f/k/a

BUTTS, Justice. This Court granted the petition of Luther Stanley Pate IV for a writ of certiorari in order to review whether the Court of Civil Appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s ruling in favor of Reginald Watkins in an action to recover workers’ compensation benefits. Watkins sued Transamerican Properties, Inc.; Transamerican Equipment Company, *428

ORDER W. HOMER DRAKE, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge. This case is before the Court on the plaintiff’s Complaint to determine dischargeability of debt. The plaintiff alleges that the debt which is the subject of this Order is nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2). The facts in the instant case as stipulated to by the parties in a Pre-trial Order filed with this Court on September 3, 1981, and as found

The plaintiff, Pamela Dale,1 appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Lillie Kelly, in Dale's negligence action based on an automobile accident that occurred in a privately owned parking lot. The issues are: 1) whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the "Rules of the Road," Ala. Code 1975, § 32-5A-1 et seq.; and 2) whether the trial court

89 F.Supp.2d 1289 (2000) Larry McDANIEL and Terrell Gray, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. IBP, INC., Smithfield Foods, Inc., and Smithfield Packing Company, Inc., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 99-A-1527-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. March 21, 2000. Herman Watson, Jr., Tara L. Helms, Watson, Jim

39 B.R. 186 (1984) In re Francine Williams OWENS-PETERSON, Debtor. GEORGIA FEDERAL BANK, FSB (formerly Georgia Federal Savings and Loan Association), Movant, v. Francine Williams OWENS-PETERSON and J. Sam Plowden, Trustee, Respondents. Bankruptcy No. 83-03505A. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. April 23, 1984. John T. Brumby, Mitche