Cases

502 Argued and under advisement June 8, certified question answered December 15, 2022 Lindsey BUERO, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC., dba Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., a fo

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LINDSEY BUERO, Individually and No. 20-35633 on behalf of all similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:19-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 00974-MO v. OPINION AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC., DBA Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., a foreign corporation; AMAZON.COM, INC., a foreign corporation,

J-A22017-24 2025 PA Super 78 ARMSLIST LLC; TORQUELIST LLC; : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JONATHAN GIBBON; AND N. : PENNSYLVANIA ANDREW VARNEY, III : : Appellants : : : v. :

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: Google Play Store Antitrust No. 24-6256 Litigation D.C. Nos. ______________________________ 3:21-md-02981-JD _ 3:20-cv-05671-JD EPIC GAMES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, OPINION Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GOOGLE LLC; GOOGL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-2900 CHARLES CURRY, doing business as GET DIESEL NUTRITION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REVOLUTION LABORATORIES, LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-2900 CHARLES CURRY, doing business as GET DIESEL NUTRITION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REVOLUTION LABORATORIES, LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DR. SEUSS ENTERPRISES, L.P., a No. 19-55348 California limited partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-02779- v. JLS-BGS COMICMIX LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company; GLENN OPINION HAUMAN, an individual; DAVID JERROLD FRIEDMAN, AKA David Gerro

LOHIER, Circuit Judge: In this appeal we principally consider the requirement of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) safe harbor that an internet service provider “adopt[ ] and reasonably implement ]” a policy to terminate “repeat infringers.” 17 U.S.C. § 512. Plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants are all record companies and music publishers. They filed this copyright infringement lawsuit against MP3tunes, LLC and

14‐4369(L) EMI Christian Music Grp., Inc. et al. v. MP3tunes, LLC et al. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2015 5 6 (Argued: May 11, 2016 Decided: October 25, 2016 7 Amended: December 13, 2016) 8 9 Docket Nos. 14‐4369‐cv(L), 14‐4509‐cv(XAP) 10 11 ________

14‐4369(L) EMI Christian Music Grp., Inc. et al. v. MP3tunes, LLC et al. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2015 5 6 (Argued: May 11, 2016 Decided: October 25, 2016) 7 8 Docket Nos. 14‐4369‐cv(L), 14‐4509‐cv(XAP) 9 10 _____________________________________ 11 EM

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: June 16, 2022 Mailed: December 20, 2022 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ DC Comics

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2443 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:22-cr-02762- TWR-1 v. DENYS KOROTKIY, OPINION Defendant - Appellant.

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALTERA CORPORATION & Nos. 16-70496 SUBSIDIARIES, 16-70497 Petitioner-Appellee, Tax Ct. Nos. v. 6253-12 9963-12 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES; No. 20-71765 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES; CITY OF GLENDORA, FCC No. CALIFORNIA; CITY OF RANCHO 19-250 PALOS VERDES; CITY OF TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA, OPINION Petitioners, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA; CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS, CALIFORNIA; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS OFFICERS AND ADVISORS; TOWN OF BRECKE