Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 27, 2024 Nos. 04-23-00144-CV; 04-23-00635-CV In the MATTER OF the MARRIAGE OF Matthew DUKE AND Christie Lynn TERRELL and in the Interest of P.O.T., a Child From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020-CI-

654 F.3d 176 (2011) Frank LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Duke TERRELL, as Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York, Joe Norwood, as Regional Director, Northeast Region, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondents-Appellants. Docket No. 10-2079-pr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: April 29, 2011. Decided: July 13, 2011.

PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Victor Villegas appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition with prejudice. In his petition, Villegas alleged that he had been improperly denied 40 days of good time credit when a Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO) relied on insufficient evidence to determine that he had committed a disciplinary violation. After careful de novo review, s

715 F.Supp.2d 479 (2010) Neb MORROW III, Petitioner, v. Duke TERRELL, Warden, MDC, Respondent. No. 10 Civ. 4110 (VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 24, 2010. *480 Neb Morrow III, Brooklyn, NY, pro se. DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. Pro se petitioner Neb

697 F.Supp.2d 549 (2010) Frank LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. Duke TERRELL, as Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center—New York, and Joe Norwood, as Regional Director, Northeast Region, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondents. No. 09 Civ. 8148(RJH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 26, 2010. *552 Nader Raymond Hasan, Pau

455 F.Supp.2d 1226 (2006) Chad L. ABERNATHY, Petitioner, v. Duke TERRELL, et al., Respondents. No. 05-3382-RDR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 22, 2006. Chad L. Abernathy, Leavenworth, KS, pro se. Jackie A. Rapstine, Office of United States Attorney, Topeka, KS, for Respondents. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROGERS, D

455 F.Supp.2d 1230 (2006) Bill, Petitioner, v. Duke TERRELL, et al., Respondents. No. 05-3391-RDR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 22, 2006. *1231 Bill Ellis, Leavenworth, KS, Pro se. David D. Plinsky, Office of United States Attorney, Topeka, KS, for Respondents. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER<

EBEL, Circuit Judge. Jose Eli Aquilar-Avellaveda, 1 a federal prisoner proceeding pro se on a Bivens complaint, 2 seeks discovery, injunctive relief, and damages related to allegations that federal prison staff violated M

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-22-00060-CV Christie Lynn TERRELL, Appellant v. Rashin MAZAHERI,

Ellington, Presiding Judge. Under an indictment returned on November 19, 2015, Terence Beavers stands accused in the Superior Court of Cobb County of kidnapping, aggravated sodomy (two counts), and rape. Beavers filed a plea in bar, arguing that prosecution of the offenses, which involved a single attack twenty years earlier on March 26, 1994, was barred by the applicable statutes of limitation. After a hearing, the trial court rejected the plea in ba

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00353-CV IN RE Matthew DUKE Original Proceeding 1 0F PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,964 EX PARTE TERRELL MAXWELL, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-08-300490 FROM TRAVIS COUNTY COCHRAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON and ALCALA, JJ., joined. WOMACK, J., filed a dissenting op

ACCEPTED 03-14-00586-CR 5089156 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00586-CR 7174343 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

OPINION Harvey Brown, Justice Kathryn and Jeff Duke appeal from the trial court’s partial summary judgment dismissing their claims for violations of the Construction Trust Funds Act.1 Although the Dukes have asserted other claims that were not resolved by the summary-judgment dismissal, they argue that the partial summary judgment is final and appealable because the trial cour

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,964

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILE!I_Z> Eric Peterson, ) AUG § 0 2010 ) . . P@fiti<>n@r, ) c?»'.‘.'!§z l’.;?a.?,'§ll§l;‘§§?'é‘;'.t.‘.’lt;la ) v_ ) Civil Action No. ) 10 1346 Duke Terre1l, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This pro se action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by a prisoner seeking a sentence reduction and his immediate release was transferred from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on the assumption that this Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00027-CR Terrell Maxwell, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED United States Treasury Department ) FEB 2 a2009 NANCYMAv ex reI J. Trent Mosby, ) rERWH/TT.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00027-CR Terrell Maxwell, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-08-300490, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION