Cases

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7352 Doc: 39 Filed: 04/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 11 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-7352 LARONE F. ELIJAH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. RICHARD S. DUNBAR, Warden, Res

Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Ricky Lopez applied for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") under Title II of the Social Security Act ("Act"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423, about four and a half years ago. (Administrative Record (R.) 175-81). He claimed that he became disabled as of December 9, 2013

INTRODUCTION Ephrain S.1 applied for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") and Supplemental Security Income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act ("Act"). 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423, 1382c(3)(A), nearly seven years ago. (Administrative Record (R.) 463-69). He clai

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: This appeal stems from the district court’s grant of attorney’s fees to Plaintiffs-Appellees Teresa Bailey and Gloria Harper (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Defendant-Appellant Hinds County District Attorney Faye Peterson (“Peterson”) argues the district court erred in finding that Plaint

269 F.Supp.2d 772 (2003) Wylanda GALES, Patricia Gamble, Daniel Glass, Dorothy McGee, Jerry Scott, Jr., and Charles Wesley Plaintiffs v. CBS BROADCASTING, INC.; Media General Operations, Inc., d/b/a WJTV; Wyatt Emmerich; Beau Strittman; Don Hewitt; Morley Safer; Deidre Naphin; Jennifer Breheny; and John Does 1-50 Defendants No. CIV.A.5:03-CV-35(BRS). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, West

293 F.Supp.2d 694 (2003) Anthony BERRY, Almeta Dorsey, Johnny Anderson, Elroy Thomas, Minnie Woods, Lee Guice, Don Donaldson, Thelma Sanders, and John Does 1-21 Plaintiffs v. Morley SAFER; Viacom Inc.; 3M Company; CBS Broadcasting, Inc.; Don Hewitt; Media General Operations, Inc., d/b/a WJTV; Beau Strittman; Wyatt Emmerich; Deidre Naphin; Jennifer Breheny; and Jane Does 1-1000 Defendants No. 5:03-CV-3.

385 F.3d 568 Kelli SMALLWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY; Mississippi Department of Transportation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-60782. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. September 10, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Cynthia H. Speetjens, Frazer & Davidson,

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC BY THE COURT: A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Appellees Illinois Central and Mississippi Department of Transportation have moved for rehearing following our decision ordering remand of this case to state court.1 Appellees contend that our decision conflated

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Appellants; PROTECT APP-BASED DRIVERS AND SERVICES et al., Interveners and Appellants. S279622 First Appellate District, Division Four A163655 Alameda County Superior

[Cite as Bizfunds, L.L.C. v. Jetmo, Inc., 2023-Ohio-81.] Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District County of Cuyahoga Nailah K. Byrd, Clerk of Courts BIZFUNDS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee COA NO. LOWER COURT NO. 111032 CV-20-933144 -vs- COMMON

355 F.3d 357 Kelli SMALLWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY; Mississippi Department of Transportation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-60782. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 19, 2003. Pat M. Barrett, Jr., Derek A. Wyatt, Barrett Law Office, Lexington, MS, Cynthia H. S

352 F.3d 220 Kelli SMALLWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY; Mississippi Department of Transportation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-60782. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Filed December 1, 2003. Derek A. Wyatt, Pat M. Barrett, Jr., Barrett Law Office, Lexington, MS, Cynthia

947 So.2d 810 (2006) STATE of Louisiana v. Leo BATISTE. No. 2006-KA-0875. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. December 20, 2006. *811 Eddie J. Jordan, Jr., District Attorney of Orleans Parish, Graham L. Bosworth, Assistant District Attorney of Orleans Parish, New Orleans, Louisiana, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Sherry

646 S.W.2d 946 (1983) Darrell Wayne JORDAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Diane JORDAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Nos. 67346, 67347. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. March 16, 1983. *947 Ronald H. Moody, Walter Dick Kettler, Waco, for appellant. Felipe Reyna, Dist. At

OVERRULING OF APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING WITHOUT WRITTEN OPINION TEAGUE, Judge, dissenting. This Court previously granted appellant’s motion for rehearing to reconsider the question, whether or not the jury argument of Karen Matkin, one of the prosecuting attorneys in this cause, constitutes reversible error.1 Today, a majority of this Court overrules wi

OPINION TEAGUE, Justice. Appellant was convicted by a jury in a consolidated trial for committing two separate robbery offenses. The trial court assessed his punishment at 13 years’ confinement in the penitentiary, with the sentences to be served concurrently. Appellant raises in his appeal only one ground of error, which relates to the prosecuting attorney’s closing jury argument which

United States Tax Court 159 T.C. No. 1 WHISTLEBLOWER 972-17W, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 972-17W. Filed July 13, 2022. ————— Whistleblower WB provided information to the IRS regarding

413 F.Supp. 523 (1976) Roland N. PATTERSON v. Norman P. RAMSEY et al. Civ. No. Y-75-964. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 29, 1976. *524 Larry S. Gibson, Charles C. Lee, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff. Benjamin L. Brown, Ambrose T. Hartman, Blanche G. Wahl, Harvey L. Okun, Baltimore, Md., for defendants.

Appellant was and is the owner and operator of a large hotel. About 5:30 o'clock P.M. on January 15, 1935, one Clockey registered as a guest and was given a room, to which he was conducted by a bellboy. Mr. Clockey was the district sales representative of an oil company, and appellee was the local representative. The business which brought Clockey to the hotel was to have a conference with appellee. It was the long established custom of the hotel that a guest should have the privilege of invi