Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dunkerson v. Dunkerson”
Schoenauer v. Alves-Dunkersonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1875 Filed January 9, 2025 DIANNE SCHOENAUER d/b/a SCHOENAUER RENTALS, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JOSELI ALVES-DUNKERSON and RELATIONSHIP, INTIMACY & SEXUAL HEALTH, INC., n/k/a RELATIONSHIP & INTIMACY CENTER, INC., Defendants-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Scott
Dunkerson v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed.
Nicholas Dunkerson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Feb 13 2019, 8:50 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral
Walck v. Dunkersonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Mitchell Lee Walck appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying his motion for leave to amend his complaint and granting summary judgment to the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that they violated his civil rights by falsely arresting him, using excessive force, and displaying deliberate indifference to his well-being during his arrest, transportation, and confine
Walck v. Dunkersonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Mitchell Lee Walck appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying his motion for leave to amend his complaint and granting summary judgment to the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that they violated his civil rights by falsely arresting him, using excessive force, and displaying deliberate indifference to his well-being during his arrest, transportation, and confine
People v. DUNKERSONpublic domain
66 Cal.Rptr.3d 795 (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 1413 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kevin DUNKERSON, Defendant and Appellant. No. C052287. Court of Appeal of California, Third District. October 10, 2007. Matthew Alger, Fresno, for Defendant and Appellant. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney Gene
State v. Dunkersonpublic domain
76 P.3d 1085 (2003) 2003 MT 234 STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Carl DUNKERSON, Defendant and Appellant. No. 02-673. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs May 1, 2003. Decided September 8, 2003. *1087 For Appellant: Dean Knapton, Kalispell, Montana. For Respon
Dunkerson v. Indiana Department of Revenuepublic domain
513 N.E.2d 209 (1987) Walter M. DUNKERSON, Petitioner, v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. No. 41T05-8612-TA-00054. Tax Court of Indiana. September 24, 1987. Edward B. Hopper, II, Indianapolis, for petitioner. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Marilyn Meighen, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for respondent. FISHER, Judge. Walter Dunkerso
Dunkerson v. Indiana Department of Revenuepublic domain
FISHER, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE The Court having taken this matter under advisement now finds: *5051. That Petitioner from June, 1965, until some time in 1982, was a shareholder and officer of Route 31 Service Plaza, Inc. (Route 31). 2. That the tax alleged to be due is in the approximate sum of $36,145 pl
Dunkerson v. Russellpublic domain
502 S.W.2d 64 (1973) Glen DUNKERSON et al., Appellants, v. Charles RUSSELL et al., Appellees. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. November 23, 1973. William Branaman, Henderson, Robert E. Delahanty, Thomas L. Hogan, Louisville, for appellants. Tommy W. Chandler, Providence, for appellees. STEINFELD, Justice. This action attacks the validity of so much of the Webster C
Dunkerson v. Goldbergpublic domain
ADAMS, Circuit Judge. This was a suit in ejectment to recover possession of a lot of ground in the city of St. Louis, Mo. A jury was waived, and the cause tried to the court on facts practically undisputed. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, from which the plaintiff prosecutes error. In 1832 James Reilley, being then the owner of the lot in controversy, sold and conveyed it by warranty deed to o
In re Dunkersonpublic domain
MCDONALD, District Judge. This case is before me on a certificate of a register in bankruptcy under the 6th section of the ! bankrupt act. To develop the matter to be decided, perhaps I cannot do better than to copy the substantial part of the register’s certificate. He certifies that:— “The Evansville National Bank presented to him in due form their deposition, accompanied by a stat
In re Dunkersonpublic domain
McDONALD, District Judge. In this case,. Charles H. Butterfield, Esq., one of the registers in bankruptcy, has certified certain facts for my decision. He certifies: “That there are two cases pending in this-court in which the question is involved, namely, the ease of R. K. Dunkerson, Alexander Wilson, and Enoch Schoenlaub — formerly partners as R. K. Dunkerson & Co.— and the case of R. K. Dunkerso
In re Dunkersonpublic domain
MCDONALD, District Judge. This case comes before me for decision under the sixth section of the bankrupt law [of 1807 (14 Stat. 520)]. The contending parties agree on the facts; and consequently the only thing to be decided is the law arising on those facts. Dunkerson & Co. have been adjudged bankrupts by a decree of this court; and Philip C. Decker has been appointed their assignee. The contesting parties ar
Marshall v. Marshallpublic domain
Thomas David Marshall, Jr. and Dana Jo Dunkerson appeal from a judgment which declared that a family trust was ineffective because the subject of the trust had not been transferred to the trustees. We will affirm the judgment. On August 23, 1985, Thomas Marshall, Sr., as grantor, and his sons and daughter, Thomas Marshall, Jr., Douglas Marshall, and Dana Jo Dunkerson, as trustees, executed a trust indenture to create the Marshall Family Trust. The trust was to be irrevocable an
Lewis Price v. Statepublic domain
February 14 2012 DA 11-0532 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2012 MT 38N LEWIS PRICE, III, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent and Appellee. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Twenty-Second Judicial District,
Williams v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AISHA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-cv-2060 (TSC) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION On July 13, 2022, Plaintiff Aisha Williams sued the District of Columbia under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act o
State v. Passwaterpublic domain
JUSTICE WHEAT delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Defendant Brent Matthew Passwater (Passwater) appeals from the Judgment and Sentence of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, ordering him to pay restitution to Lynn Boots (Lynn), Bryce Boots (Bryce), and to the Crime Victim Compensation Program
State v. HEAFNERpublic domain
231 P.3d 1087 (2010) 2010 MT 87 356 Mont. 128 STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Braden Lee HEAFNER, Defendant and Appellant. No. DA 09-0364. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs March 31, 2010. Decided April 27, 2010. For Appellant: Joslyn Hunt, Chief Appellate Defender, Jim Wheelis
State v. Schaefferpublic domain
CHIEF JUSTICE McGRATH delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Richard Schaeffer appeals from his conviction of the crime of felony theft by insurance fraud in the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County. We affirm. ¶2 Schaeffer presents the following issues for review: