Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dunn, Trustee v. Cell More LLC”
Person v. Denbury Onshore, LLCpublic domain
IRVING, P.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Bill Person sued Denbury Onshore LLC (Denbury) to recover certain royalties allegedly due him. The Pike County Chancery Court, finding that Person’s claims were subject to res judicata and were barred by the statute of limitations, entered a final judgment of dismissal in favor of Denbury. Person filed a motion for reconsideration, which the chancery court denied. Feeling ag
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 100REPORTERS LLC, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 14-1264 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 83, 86 : UNITED STATES
100Reporters LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Justicepublic domain
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter arises from a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") investigation *135of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft ("Siemens") conducted by the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). As a result
Crown Emak Partners, LLC v. Kurzpublic domain
992 A.2d 377 (2010) CROWN EMAK PARTNERS, LLC, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donald A. KURZ, Sems Diversified Value, LP, Lloyd M. Sems, Philip S. Kleweno, Michael Konig, and Take Back EMAK, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, Appellees. James L. Holbrook, Jr., Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Donald A. Kurz and Sems Diversified Value, LP, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees. Nos. 64, 2010, 85, 2010.</
In Re Scotia Development, LLCpublic domain
375 B.R. 764 (2007) In re SCOTIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Debtors. No. 07-20027. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division. April 5, 2007. *765 Eric J. Fromme, J. Scot Kennedy, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Irvine, CA, James Matthew Vaughn, John F. Higgins, IV, Joshua Walton Wolfshohl, Porter & Hedges LLP, Kyung
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
epicRealm, Licensing, LLC v. Autoflex Leasing, Inc.public domain
492 F.Supp.2d 608 (2007) EPICREALM, LICENSING, LLC v. AUTOFLEX LEASING, INC., et al. epicRealm, Licensing, LLC v. Franklin Covey Co., et al. Nos. 2:05CV163, 2:05CV356. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. June 26, 2007. *609 *610
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
INTHECOURTOF APPEALS Fl:LED J:N FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Court of Appeals Jt;N 0 7 2018 Lis2 Matz Clerk 1 5th District CAUSE NO. 05-16-00784-CV TONY A PARKS & PARKS REALTY FIRM, LLC
ACCEPTED 14-15-00295-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/3/2015 11:45:08 AM
Westwood v. City of Hermistonpublic domain
787 F.Supp.2d 1174 (2011) Deborah WESTWOOD; Mitchell Myers; and Petal Pushers & More, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, doing business as Nookie's Bistro & Spirits, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF HERMISTON, Daniel Coloumbe, and Chris Washburn, Defendants. No. 09-CV-478-BR. United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division. April 15, 2011.
STEPHEN J. WINDHORST, Judge. ^Appellant, Board of Trustees of the Louisiana Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, South Central Jurisdiction (“Louisiana Annual Conference”), appeals the trial court’s judgment finding that appellee, Revelation Know!*356edge Outreach Ministry, LLC (“Revelation Knowledge”), is the lawful possessor of the property at issue and
Markham Concepts, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.public domain
WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge To people of a certain age, who grew up in the America of the 1960s and 70s - where television meant three channels and shows like Bonanza, Star Trek, and The Art Linkletter Show (more on that to come); where cars were made in America, period; and where phones were connected to wires, not cell towers - the Game of Life was a gangbuster hit found (it seemed) in every household
Colvin v. Amegy Mortgage Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VACATING BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER AND REMANDING TO BANKRUPTCY COURT DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. Debtor Richard B. Colvin (“Colvin”) appeals the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing with prejudice Colvin’s adversary proceeding against Appellee Amegy Mortgage Company (“Amegy”). (Dkt. #3.) For the foregoing reasons, the Court VACATES the bankruptcy court’s denial
Brown v. Knowlespublic domain
OPINION CARPENETI, Chief Justice. I. INTRODUCTION The unpaid employee of a closely-held corporation sued the corporation and its president for back wages in superior court. The day after the employee filed suit, the corporation filed for Chapter 11 bankruptey. The bankruptcy court discharged the corporation's debts, and the superior court dismissed the corporation, but the superior court
Colvin v. Amegy Mortgage Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VACATING BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER AND REMANDING TO BANKRUPTCY COURT DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. Debtor Richard B. Colvin (“Colvin”) appeals the bankruptcy court’s order dis*172missing with prejudice Colvin’s second adversary proceeding against Appellee Amegy Mortgage Company (“Amegy”). (Dkt. # 3.) F
Kenneth L. Hunter v. Town of Mocksville, NCpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1374 KENNETH L. HUNTER; RICK A. DONATHAN; JERRY D. MEDLIN, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. TOWN OF MOCKSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA; ROBERT W. COOK, in his official capacity as Administrative Chief of Police of the Mocksville Police Department and in his individual capacity; CHRISTIN
Sweatman v. Gilespublic domain
PER CURIAM. Jason Ray Sweatman, an inmate at Ven-tress Correctional Facility (“the prison”), appeals from a judgment dismissing his civil action against the warden of the prison, J.C. Giles, and the chaplain of the prison, Daniel B. Rieben. Sweatman filed a complaint against Giles and Rieben, both individually and in their official capacities, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In the complaint, Sweat-man alleged