⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Dunn v. 220 Island Drive Properties LLC”

Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015-08-10 · Published · cited 49× · 63 V.I. 563; 2015 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 23
OPINION OF THE COURT (August 10, 2015) HODGE, Chief Justice. Appellant Joe Harold Vanterpool2 appeals from a series of Superior Court rulings granting summary judgment to the Government of the Virgin Islands and later refusing to reconsider that ruling. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the grant of summary judgment and remand the case to the Sup
Utah Supreme Court · 2020-10-29 · Published · cited 6× · 478 P.3d 1026; 2020 UT 69
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2020 UT 69 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH PLEASANT GROVE CITY, Appellee, v. KEITH TERRY, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2025-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
State of Maryland, Comptroller of Maryland v. Badlia Brothers, LLC d/b/a Southwest Check Cashing, No. 23, September Term, 2024. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY – STATE GOVERNMENT § 12-201(a) – WRITTEN CONTRACT – FORMAL CONTRACT The State has inherent sovereign immunity and thus cannot be sued absent its consent. Section 12-201(a) of the State Government Article forbids the State from raising a sovereign immunity defense in a “contract action” that is “based on a written contract” executed by a State offic
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016-10-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ZOHAR CDO 2003-1, LLC; ZOHAR CDO : 2003-1, LTD; ZOHAR II 2005-1, LLC; : ZOHAR II 2005-1 LTD.; ZOHAR III, LLC; : and ZOHAR III, LTD., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : C.A. No. 12247-VCS
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-07-22 · Published · cited 36× · 302 F.R.D. 37; 2014 WL 3610946; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100145
MEMORANDUM ORDER JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge. This is an action to recover damages for unlawful employment discrimination and retaliation on the basis of race brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and the Kentucky Civil Rights Act. Plaintiff Curt Hawley has moved for sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, alleging that defendant Mphasis Corporation (“
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 5× · 2017 SD 79; 904 N.W.2d 502
#27368-a-JMK 2017 S.D. 79 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** MARK AND MARILYN LONG, ARNIE AND SHIRLEY VAN VOORST, TIM AND SARA DOYLE, TIMOTHY AND JANE GRIFFITH AND MICHAEL and KAREN TAYLOR, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Defendant and Appellant. ****
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-05-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE FREDERICK HSU LIVING TRUST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12108-VCL ) OAK HILL CAPITAL PARTNERS III, L.P., ) OAK HILL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ) PARTNERS III
California Court of Appeal · 2016-11-29 · Published · cited 31× · 6 Cal. App. 5th 160; 211 Cal. Rptr. 3d 327; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 1035
Opinion POLLAK, J. Plaintiffs Mission Bay Alliance and others 1 appeal from the trial court’s denial of two consolidated petitions to set aside the certification *168 of the environmental impact report and related permi
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-03-27 · Published · cited 24× · 377 F. Supp. 3d 359
GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge: Press America, Inc. ("Press America") contracted to print and mail letters for Plaintiffs CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Caremark Rx, LLC. The letters were related to Plaintiffs' pharmaceutical benefits program, so the parties were aware that the contract involved some risk that letters containing individuals' private health care information would be misdirected. Press America indemnified Plaintiffs for any
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016-01-30 · Published · cited 6× · 161 F. Supp. 3d 1020; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16644; 2016 WL 546375
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and/or For Judgment on the Pleadings; Memorandum in Support, filed November 10, 2015 (Doc. 22)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing, on January 28, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether Plaintiff Northern New Mexicans Protecting Land Wat
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-03-31 · Published · cited 35× · 246 F. Supp. 3d 772; 2017 WL 1233991; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50103
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.. .782 BACKGROUND... 782 A.Relevant Statutes.. .783 B. The Alleged Scheme... 784 C. Other Cases and Procedural History. . .786 LEGAL STANDARDS... 787. DISCUSSION.. .788
Allen v. Milliganpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-08 · Published · cited 39× · 599 U.S. 1
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–109 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 8, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are reque
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
The Supreme Court of South Carolina State of South Carolina ex rel. Alan Wilson, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondent, v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc., and/or Janssen, L.P., and Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Defendants, of whom Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015-02-25 · Published · cited 24× · 414 S.C. 33; 777 S.E.2d 176
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court State of South Carolina ex. rel. Alan Wilson, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondent, v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc., and/or Janssen, L.P., and Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Defendants, of whom Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-206987 Appeal from Spartanburg County
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2018-12-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GREAT HILL EQUITY PARTNERS IV, ) LP, GREAT HILL INVESTORS LLC, ) FREMONT HOLDCO, INC., and ) BLUESNAP, INC. (F/K/A PLIMUS), ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 7906-VCG ) SIG GROWTH EQUITY FUND I, ) LLLP, SI
District Court, D. Oregon · 2011-04-15 · Published · cited 1× · 787 F. Supp. 2d 1174; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41490; 2011 WL 1458083
787 F.Supp.2d 1174 (2011) Deborah WESTWOOD; Mitchell Myers; and Petal Pushers & More, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, doing business as Nookie's Bistro & Spirits, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF HERMISTON, Daniel Coloumbe, and Chris Washburn, Defendants. No. 09-CV-478-BR. United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division. April 15, 2011.
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015-11-02 · Published · cited 19× · 144 F. Supp. 3d 809; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148489; 2015 WL 6675088
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge. This case involves Virginia’s hotly contested “Public-Private” toll lane scheme. Plaintiffs in this case seek class action status, and are all users of the High-Occupancy Toll Roads operated by Defendants in Northern Virginia. This matter is before the Court on three motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, filed by (1) Defendants Trans
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026-04-24 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0122p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JESSICA CLIPPINGER, nka Jessica Pyron, on behalf of │
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011-02-10 · Published · cited 3× · 248 P.3d 1067
248 P.3d 1067 (2011) COLUMBIA PARK GOLF COURSE, INC., a Washington corporation, Respondent, v. CITY OF KENNEWICK, a municipal corporation in and for the State of Washington, Appellant. No. 28357-7-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3. February 10, 2011. Reconsideration Denied April 11, 2011. *1069 Mich
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-11-26 · Published · cited 42× · 343 F. Supp. 3d 122
Lewis A. Kaplan, District Judge. *140Table of Contents Background...142 I. Derivatives and the Money Market...142 II. The BBSW Rate "Set"...143 A. Prime Bank Bills...143 B. The Rate "Set"...144 III. BBSW-Ba