Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dunn v. Vetter”
New Hampshire Insurance Co. v. Vetterpublic domain
326 N.W.2d 723 (1982) NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Myron VETTER, Robert F. Yackley and L.J. Spivey, d/b/a Yackley Partnership, Dick Seaman and Rosella Seaman, Defendants and Appellees. No. 13752. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs October 15, 1982. Decided November 24, 1982. Donald A. Porter of Costel
Vetter v. Town of Bisonpublic domain
278 N.W.2d 202 (1979) Laura VETTER, Claimant and Appellant, v. TOWN OF BISON and Sunshine Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants and Respondents. No. 12377. Supreme Court of South Dakota. April 26, 1979. David A. Gerdes, of May, Adam, Gerdes & Thompson, Pierre, for claimant and appellant. Curtis D. Ireland of Lynn, Jackson, Shultz, Ireland & Lebrun, Rap
Estate of Vetterpublic domain
Henry J. Angelo commenced a proceeding to obtain a judgment admitting an alleged lost or destroyed olographic will to probate. Process was served on Anna Vetter, the surviving wife of the decedent, Frederick J. Vetter, and she appeared and answered. A trial was had before the trial court. The trial court made findings of fact in favor of the surviving wife Anna Vetter and from a judgment entered thereon the plaintiff has appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. In his openi
795 F.2d 238 55 USLW 2068, 1986-1 Trade Cases 67,182,5 Fed.R.Serv.3d 646,1 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 681 Irwin ABRAHAM; John Anderson; Thomas Baker; ArthurBalmes; Banwell, White & Arnold, Inc.; Christopher &Elizabeth Beirne; Joseph Blackburn; Bryan Brames; JamesA. Bunn; Richard & Sigrid Burns; Richard Butler; Ann B.Caulfield; Edwin F. & Joanne Cedilotte; Frederick Coholan;
Hasbro, Inc. v. Mikohn Gaming Corp.public domain
491 F.Supp.2d 256 (2007) HASBRO, INC., and Hasbro International, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. MIKOHN GAMING CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 05-106 S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. June 12, 2007. *257 Jeffrey K. Techentin, Linda A. Mayer, Todd D. White, Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C., Providence, RI, for Plaintiffs.
Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ALLERGAN, INC., AND DUKE UNIVERSITY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP., SANDOZ, INC., AND HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC., Defendants-Appellants. ______________________ 2013-1245, -1246, -1247 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for th
Bernau v. Iowa Department of Transportationpublic domain
580 N.W.2d 757 (1998) James BERNAU, Mary Bernau, Carlisle Beekman, Lorraine Beekman, Richard Laube, Judy Laube, Merlin Stock, Cheryl Stock, Gary Bernau, Patricia Bernau, David Bernau, and Jolene Bernau, Appellants, v. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, The Iowa Transportation Commission, Catherine Dunn, Chairperson, Lloyd E. Clark, Commissioner, Janice Johnson, Commissioner, Richard Pellet, Commissioner, Bonnie Vetter, Commissioner, Marlin Volz,
177 B.R. 960 (1995) In re AMERICANA EXPRESSWAYS, Debtor. Kenneth A. RUSHTON, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. SARATOGA FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant. United States of America on behalf of the Interstate Commerce Commission, Intervenor-Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 91-C-25142. Adv. No. 93-PC-2391. District Ct. No. 94-C-1171S. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division.
172 B.R. 99 (1994) In re AMERICANA EXPRESSWAYS, INC., Debtor. Kenneth A. RUSHTON, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. SARATOGA FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 91C-25142. Adv. No. 93PC-2391. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah. September 12, 1994. Michael N. Zundel, Jeffery J. Devashrayee, Jardine, Linebaugh, Brown & Dunn, Salt Lake City, UT, Joseph L
WINTER, Circuit Judge: Representatives of certain unsecured creditors of the Chapter 11 debtor Tribune Company appeal from Judge Sullivan’s grant of a motion to dismiss their state law, constructive fraudulent conveyance claims brought against Tribune’s former shareholders. .Appellants seek to recover an amount sufficient to. satisfy Tribune’s debts to them by avoiding (recovering) payments by Tribune to shareholders that purc
McCarthy v. Evolution Petroleum Corp.public domain
STEWART, J. | plaintiffs, John C. McCarthy, individually and as trustee of the Kathleen McCarthy Balden Trust, and Majorie M. Moss, filed suit against defendants, Evolution Petroleum Corporation (“Evolution”), formerly known as Natural Gas Systems, Inc., and NGS Sub. Corp. (“NGS”), for rescission of the sale of their royalty rights in the Delhi Field Unit in the Holt Bryant Reservoir, damages, and attorney fees. Plaintiffs ass
Anthony v. West Coast Drug Companypublic domain
331 F.Supp. 1279 (1971) Linda ANTHONY and Andrew F. Anthony, her husband et al., Plaintiffs, v. WEST COAST DRUG COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant. Civ. No. 32-71C2. United States District Court, W. D. Washington, at Seattle. October 5, 1971. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & Riley, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs. Ben J. Gantt, Jr., William V. Vetter, Graham, Mc
Amerind Risk Management v. Myrna Malaterrepublic domain
BYE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the holding as to the Tribal Court lacking jurisdiction over the three tribal members’ direct suit against Amerind, a holding the majority justifies on the grounds Amerind is entitled to tribal immunity. First, I believe Amerind waived its immunity in the contract between itself and the Turtle Mountain Housing Authority (TMHA). Second
Wilbur E. Dow, Jr. v. Max H. Wymanpublic domain
492 F.2d 950 Wilbur E. DOW, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Max H. WYMAN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 71-2948. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 21, 1974, Rehearing Denied March 20, 1974. DeWitt Williams (argued), J. Kenneth McMullin of Williams, Lanza, Kastner & Gibbs, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-a
Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings Boardpublic domain
85 Wn.2d 441 (1975) 536 P.2d 157 THE HAMA HAMA COMPANY, Respondent, v. SHORELINES HEARINGS BOARD, Defendant, THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY et al, Appellants. No. 43357. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. June 5, 1975. As amended by order June 13, 1975. Slade Gorton, Attorney General, Charles B. Roe, Jr., Senior Assistan
State v. Ottopublic domain
SANDSTROM, Justice. [¶ 1] Wayne Otto appeals after the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search of a camper and he entered a conditional plea of guilty. We affirm the judgment, concluding the camper falls within the scope of the automobile exception to the warrant requirement, justifying the warrantless search because law enforceme
Banks v. Nissan North America, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge Plaintiffs motion for class certification and motion for leave to file a fourth amended class action complaint came on for hearing before this court on October 30, 2013. Plaintiffs Brandon Banks, Erin Banks
617 F.3d 14 (2010) SACCUCCI AUTO GROUP, INC., f/k/a Saccucci Lincoln Mercury Inc., d/b/a Saccucci Honda, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC.; American Honda Finance Corporation, d/b/a Honda Financial Services, Defendants, Appellees. No. 09-2110. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard May 4, 2010. Decided August 4, 2010.
Valley Plymouth v. Studebaker-Packard Corporationpublic domain
219 F.Supp. 608 (1963) VALLEY PLYMOUTH, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. STUDEBAKER-PACKARD CORPORATION, a corporation, Ranchero Motors, Inc., a corporation, and Phil Rauch, Defendants. No. 556-61. United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division. April 12, 1963. *609 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, by John J. Hanson, Fre
Price v. KNL Custom Homes, Inc.public domain
[Cite as Price v. KNL Custom Homes, Inc., 2015-Ohio-436.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) RON L. PRICE, et al. C.A. No. 26968 Appellee/Cross-Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT