Cases

05/22/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 29, 2020 DAN E. DURELL v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 115460 Steven Wayne Sword, Judge ___________________________________

ACCEPTED 03-15-00522-CV 8044059 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 12, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DEREK CUNNINGHAM, JR. Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County FILED No. 14-01981 W. Mark Ward, Judge NOV 18 2024

ACCEPTED 03-15-00522-CV 8129133 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

*878The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s challenges for cause to two potential jurors. The statements made by the two prospective jurors “did not rise to the level of actual bias or otherwise indicate that [they] would be unable to render an impartial verdict” (People v Smith, 48 AD3d 489 [2008]; see People v Ross, 12 AD3d 463 [2004];

224 S.W.3d 544 (2007) Ed VANEGAS, Jimmy D. Halman, Sam Armstrong, Alex Carbajal, Roger Farrington, Curtis Huff, and Tito Betancur, Appellants, v. AMERICAN ENERGY SERVICES, Niewoehner Partnership, L.P., RCH/HSJ/CCM/MCP I, L.P., Autry Stephens, John Carnett, Brack Blackwood, and Dennie Martin, Appellees. No. 11-06-00118-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. May 10, 2007.

[Cite as Simpson v. Ison, 2020-Ohio-1582.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO RHONDA Y. SIMPSON, : APPEAL NO. C-180686 TRIAL NO. A-1803078 Plaintiff-Appellant, : vs. : O P I N I O N. D

[Cite as Blue Durham Properties v. Krantz, 2019-Ohio-4459.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA BLUE DURHAM PROPERTIES, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Nos. 107974 and 108167 v. : MARK K. KRANTZ, ET A

752 F.Supp.2d 1127 (2010) PROGENY VENTURES, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. CV 09-06741 DMG (VBKx). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 16, 2010. *1129 Robert M. Ross, Klass Helman & Ross, Encino, CA, for Plaintiff. C

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [22] OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Can a website’s design constitute pro-tectable trade dress under the Lanham Act? If so, under what circumstances? The Court must squarely confront these issues and others in this Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant W4, LLC. This action arises out of W4’s allege

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JUNE SESSION, 1999 FILED August 9, 1999 STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9808-CC-00253 Cecil Crowson, Jr. )

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 17, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00862-CR DURELL NOAL WATTS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Ca

665 N.E.2d 374 (1996) CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant and Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, Defendant and Counterplaintiff and Appellant and Cross-Appellee. No. 1-95-0173. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. April 12, 1996. Rehearing Denied May 14, 1996.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Burton Richter, Linda Collins Cork, Georgia L. May, Thomas Merigan, Alfred Spivack, and Janice R, Anderson (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this suit individually, on behalf of a proposed class, and derivatively as creditors, against CC-Palo Alto, Inc. (“CC-PA”), CC-Development Group, Inc. (“CC-DG”), and

[Cite as Rice v. Lewis, 2013-Ohio-5890.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY STEPHEN A. RICE, et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : Case No. 13CA3551 vs. : CHERISH LEWIS, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Defe

11/22/2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 6, 2017 Session IN RE: ESTATE OF J. DON BROCK Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 15-P-245 Jeffrey M. Atherton, Chancellor

Affirming. Alleging that he was employed as general manager of the Eagle Coal Company at a stipulated salary and one-fifth interest in the profits of the business, and that he continued in the employment for a period of thirty-four months, during which the profits were $100,000.00, C.I. Ross brought this suit against the Eagle Coal Company to recover $20,000.00. On final hearing his petition was dismissed, and he appeals. Ross's evidence as to the terms of the contract may be su

Filed 5/16/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JOSHUA NARANJO, F083197 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CV-21-001363) v. DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF

Filed 4/28/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JOSHUA NARANJO, F083197 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CV-21-001363) v. DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF O

ORDER re: Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment [30] HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW Senior U.S. District Judge Currently before the Court is Defendant Circle K Stores Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion” or “Motion for Summary Judgment”). Having reviewed all papers submitted pertaining to t