Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 30, 2018 No. 04-18-00603-CR Brian Dwayne WILLIAMS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 8, 2019 No. 04-18-00603-CR Brian Dwayne WILLIAMS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

[Cite as Walling v. Wagner, 2016-Ohio-5444.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY LARRY D. WALLING : : Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO. 26807 : v.

KASOLD, Judge, dissenting: Because I believe the majority misapply the law, I respectfully dissent. A primary issue in this case is whether reasonably identified service medical records regarding the hospitalization of Mr. Moore for a psychiatric problem should have been obtained by the Secretary, and, if not obtained, whether the Secretary should have *221

NO. 12-11-00251-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DWAYNE GILBREATH AND § APPEAL FROM THE 402ND PATSY GILBREATH, APPELLANTS V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT MATTIE STEED AND PAT BIRMINGHAM, APPELLEES

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-01-00053-CR

340 S.W.3d 570 (2011) SONAT EXPLORATION COMPANY, Appellant, v. CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL, INC., Appellee. No. 06-10-00096-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted April 27, 2011. Decided May 9, 2011. *571 Joel L. Thollander, McKool Smith, PC, Austin, Rosemary Snider, Sam F. Baxter, McKool Smith, PC, Marsha

271 S.W.3d 228 (2008) SONAT EXPLORATION COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL, INC., Respondent. No. 06-0979. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued February 6, 2008. November 21, 2008. *230 R. Keith Jarrett, Thomas P. Diaz, Liskow & Lewis, New Orleans, LA, Sam Baxter, Rosemary T. Snider, Joel Thollander, McK

In this mandamus proceeding, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company seeks relief from a trial court order striking its petition in intervention. Lumbermens is the insurer of Cudd Pressure Control, Inc. In the underlying lawsuit, which is currently on appeal in the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Judicial District, Cudd was found liable for $20.7 million as the indemnitor of Sonat Exploration Company. Lumbermens posted $29 million in appellate security to secure the judgment pending appeal.

WIGGINS, Justice (dissenting). I would find the plaintiffs’ constitutional claims justiciable and remand the case for further proceedings on the merits of those *44claims. Therefore, I dissent from Justice Mansfield’s opinion29 and Chief Justice Cady’s concurring opinion because they reach the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims un

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 720 The issue in this case is whether an insurer that posted a $29 million bond to supersede an adverse judgment against its insured may intervene in the insured's appeal to assert a potentially dispositive issue that its insured abandoned in order to settle certain uninsured claims in another pending lawsuit. T

Michael Massengale, Justice This is an appeal from a case dismissed based on a limitations defense. The appellants are the adult children of Ernal Lewis, Sr., who died in 1982. The appellants were minors at the time of their father's death. In 2014, they sued Walker Arenson, who was the independent administrator of their father's estate, seeking an accounting and alleging causes of action for fraud by nondisclosure, negligent misrep

702 DeKalb Residence, LLC v SSLiberty, Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 05971) 702 DeKalb Residence, LLC v SSLiberty, Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 05971 Decided on October 26, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reportin

936 S.W.2d 797 (1997) Ronald LASKY, Edward Boni, William J. Kusmec, Russell Whitener, Shelly Stanley Harmon, Alan Dwayne Henry, and Vondell Jackson, Respondents, v. UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant. No. 79235. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. January 21, 1997. James J. Virtel, Ann E. Buckley, St. Louis, for Appellant. *798

MEMORANDUM YOUNG, District Judge. I. PRIOR PROCEEDINGS This lengthy litigation began in 2002, when the plaintiffs, Aspex Eyewear, Inc. and Contour Optik, Inc. (collectively “Aspex”), filed suit under 35 U.S.C. § 271 against Altair Eyewear, Inc. (“Altair”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for infringement of three United States patents

151 P.3d 1249 (2007) Mary I. THOENI, Appellant, v. CONSUMER ELECTRONIC SERVICES, et al., Appellees. No. S-11897. Supreme Court of Alaska. January 12, 2007. Rehearing Denied March 1, 2007. *1250 Mary I. Thoeni, pro se, Wasilla. Timothy A. McKeever, Holmes Weddle & Barcott, P.C., Anchorage, for Appellees

341 S.W.3d 428 (2009) Christopher Dwayne BANKS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 01-08-00286-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). November 5, 2009. *430 Patricia Fortney Sedita, Sugar Land, for Appellant. Alan Curry, Houston, for Appellee. Panel consists of Justices KEYES, ALCALA, and H

Memorandum Opinion and Order JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on Wal-Mart’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DN 24] and its First Motion in Limine Concerning Plaintiffs’ Expert, Keith Vidal, P.E. [DN 26]. Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. For the following reasons, Wal-Mart’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED and Wal-Mart’s motion in limine is GR

765 N.W.2d 550 (2009) 2009 SD 28 A.M. FARMS, Dan Miller; Gabriel Aberle; Tom Aljoe; Richard Becking; Todd Becking; William Becking; Bergh Farms; Larry Bergh; Phil Bergh; John Blais and Nancy Blais; Tim Boerger; Larry Borkhuis; Don Brandriet; Roger Brandriet; Doug Brandriet; Merlin Bunde; Stan Busskohl; Carpenter Farms; Richard Carpenter; Robbie Carpenter; Chuck Clausen; Brian Comes; Jim Comes; William A. Comes; Tom Dagel; David De

MURDOCK, Justice. Volcano Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Club Volcano (“Volcano Enterprises”), appeals from the denial of its Rule 60(b)(4), Aa. R. Civ. P., motion to set aside the judgment entered against it in a wrongful-death action filed by Peggy Bender Rush, as ad-ministratrix of the estate of her husband Derric Edwin Rush and as the widow of Derric Edwin Rush, and by Dashton Rush, the Rushes’ minor son, by an through his mot