Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “Dye v. Eisenstein”
Eisenstein v. Sternpublic domain
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ.
Cortese v. Connorspublic domain
Dye, J. By written lease dated July 26, 1947 the plaintiffs Córtese in the first entitled action leased from the defendant Connors for a term of five years, with the privilege of renewal for a like term, the premises known as 117 Robinson Street, Binghamton, New York. Upon its expiration in 1952, the lease was renewed for another five-year term. It contained a covenant, viz.: “5. The Landlord agrees that in the event of
Cleeton v. SIU Healthcare, Inc.public domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
David R. Fitzgerald v. Hickman County Governmentpublic domain
04/04/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 14, 2018 Session DAVID R. FITZGERALD v. HICKMAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hickman County No. 16CV-2 Joseph Woodruff, Judge _____________________
Resnick v. Bittlemanpublic domain
Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in the negative. Second question certified not answered. No opinion. Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ.
Scott v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Ftjld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
United States v. Bank of New England, N.A.public domain
BOWNES, Circuit Judge. The Bank of New England appeals a jury verdict convicting it of thirty-one violations of the Currency Transaction Reporting Act *847 (the Act). 1 31 U.S.C. §§ 5311-22 (1982).
City of Mobile v. Boldenpublic domain
Mr. Justice Marshall, dissenting* The American ideal of political equality, conceived in the earliest days of our colonial existence and fostered by the *104egalitarian language of the Declaration of Independence, could not forever tolerate the limitation of the right to vote to white propertied males. Our Constitution has bee
Thompson v. Wallinpublic domain
Lewis, J. An appeal in each of these three cases presents for our decision the constitutionality of section 3022 of the Education Law (L. 1949, ch. 360) commonly known, and hereinafter referred to as the Feinberg Law.* At the outset the fact should be noted that prior to the enactment of the challenged statute, the Legislature had prescribed statutory standards governing within the