Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “DynCorp v. Capital Associates”
B. Alleging Fraud Complaints brought under the False Claims Act must comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b). United States ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp. , 286 F.3d 542, 551-52 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Rule 9(b) requires that a "party state with particularity the circumst
Hutchins v. Dyncorp International, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ex rel. CHARLES HUTCHINS AND ) JOYCE SUBHI, ) ) Plaintiff-Relators, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-355 (RMC)
Mieras v. Dyncorppublic domain
HARTZ, Judge (specially concurring.) (37) I concur in the result and join in the portion of the majority opinion affirming the decision below as to each of the issues raised in Appellants’ appeal. I write separately to explain my reasons for rejecting the constitutional challenge to the fee restriction. (38) First, because Claimant contends
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE INVICTUS GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, ) LLC, INVICTUS SPECIAL ) SITUATIONS I GP, and AMIT PATEL, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. No. N24C-07-306 KMM ) v. ) ) CORBIN CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P., ) GATEWOOD CAPIT
Dyncorp Information Systems, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court after argument on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment with respect to Count I of plaintiffs complaint and defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment with respect to Count IV. The effective date of the contract in question, January 1,1990, preceded the date of execution, September 3, 1991. Count I puts in issue whether F
Seven Investments, LLC v. AD Capital, LLCpublic domain
OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. Plaintiff Seven Investments, LLC and defendant AD Capital, LLC agreed to combine their investment management operations into a single firm to be known as Canvas Companies, LLC. After coming to believe that AD Capital was engaged in fraud, Seven Investments terminated the arrangement. In a formal termination agreement dated as of April 3, 2009 (the “Termination A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES ex rel. : PCA INTEGRITY ASSOCIATES, LLP, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 15-750 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 77,
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FINGER LAKES CAPITAL PARTNERS, ) LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 9742-VCL ) HONEOYE LAKE ACQUISITION, LLC, ) and LYRICAL OPPORTUNITY ) PARTNERS, L.P.,
OPINION AND ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. Plaintiff Pharos Capital Partners, L.P. brings this action against defendant Credit Suisse Securities LLC for fraud in connection with a failed $12 million equity investment. In 2002 Pharos purchased preferred stock in'National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc. Credit Suisse acted as a co-placement agent on the stock offering, and, according to
SUPERSEDING MEMORANDUM OBERDORFER, District Judge. The instant qui tam action was filed on June 6, 1996, on behalf of the United States by plaintiffs John Ervin and Ervin Associates, Inc. (collectively, “Ervin”) against several entities, including Hamilton Securities Group, Inc. (“Hamilton”). Over the course of four days of trial i; a October 2003, Ervin submitted testimou .y and documentary
332 F.Supp.2d 1 (2003) UNITED STATES of America ex rel., ERVIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. The HAMILTON SECURITIES GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A.96-CV1258(LFO), CIV.A.99-CV1698(LFO). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 1, 2003. *2 Aaron L. Handleman, Eccleston & Wolf, Joseph P. Hornya
Geronimo Music, LLC v. Copsidas, Jr.public domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GERONIMO MUSIC, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N20C-02-166 MMJ ) FRANK COPSIDAS, JR., ) ) Defendant. )
Pimpaktra A. Rust v. Vina Elise Rustpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PIMPAKTRA A. RUST, individually ) and in her capacity as a co-manager of ) Goodenow LLC, ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0762-SG ) VINA ELISE RUST and CHAKDHARI ) ANISSA RUST, individually and in their ) capacity
Koscho v. The Merit Distribution Group, LLCpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHRISTOPHER KOSCHO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) C.A. No. N24C-12-106 PAW CCLD ) THE MERIT DISTRIBUTION ) GROUP, LLC and CZECH ASSET ) MANAGEMENT, L.P., ) ) Defendants. ) Submit
Doe v. Bank of America Corp.public domain
OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge John Doe, “a well-known international figure with a political background,” and his daughter, Jane Doe, sue the Bank of America Corporation for negligence and breach of contract (Counts I and II) because, after Mr. Doe’s 34-year personal banking relationship with Bank of America, both his and his daug
Liborio III, L.P. v. Artesian Water Company, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LIBORIO III, L.P., § § No. 85, 2023 Plaintiff Below, Appellant, § § Court Below: Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § ARTESIAN WATER COMPANY, § C.A. No. N22C-06-109 INC.,
LCT Captial, LLC v. NGL Energy Partners LPpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LCT CAPITAL, LLC, : : Plaintiff, : v. : : C. A. No. N15C-08-109 JJC CCLD NGL ENERGY PARTNERS LP and : NGL ENERGY HOLDINGS LLC, : : Defendants. :
Middleton v. Prattpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA James B. Middleton, et al. : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 21-cv-2301 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 3, 7, 11
Windsor v. CWCapital Assetpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WINDSOR I, LLC, § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § No. 443, 2019 § v. § § Court Below: Superior Court CWCAPITAL ASSET § of the Stat
Hildebrandt v. Venemanpublic domain
OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for sanctions against the plaintiffs, along with the defendants’ motion to strike a “notice of filing” submitted by the plaintiffs shortly after the filing of their memorandum opposing the motion for sanctions. The defendants seek dismissal of th