Cases

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Ticketmaster L.L.C. ("Ticketmaster") brings this suit against Prestige Entertainment West, Inc., Renaissance Ventures LLC, Nicholas Lombardi, and Steven K. Lichtman1 (collectively, "Defendants"), alleging thirteen causes of action based on Defendants' use of automated programs generally known as bots, which

OPINION & ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States ■ Magistrate Judge: On October 25, 2013, Ronald D. Corwin, an annual member of the Citi Bike bicycle sharing program, was riding a Citi Bike in Midtown Manhattan. - Upon ■ passing through a Citi Bike station located on East 56th Street and Madison Avenue, he collided with a concrete wheel stop and violently hit his head against the, cement. Alleging

SIDNEY H. STEIN, U.S. District Judge Broker Genius is a technology company serving ticket brokers on the secondary ticket market. Its product, AutoPricer v.3 ("AutoPricer"), is a web application that enables secondary-market ticket brokers to dynamically and automatically price their inventory of tickets. Through contractual Terms of Use, Broker Genius customers are granted a conditional license to

OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, U.S. District Judge. Broker. Genius, Inc., a company that develops software for the ticket broker industry, has sued its former licensees— defendants Nathan Zalta and Michael Sha-mah, and their company, NRZ Entertainment LLC — alleging that they used their access to Broker Genius’s AutoPrieer v.3, software improperly to acquire the know

OPINION ARLEO, District Judge Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Class Experts [Dkt. No 337] and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [Dkt. No. 309]. The Court conducted a Daubert hearing from September 9th to September 11th, 2015. Considering the testimony and briefing, the Court is convinced that Plaintiffs’ ex*826

23-935 (L) Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2023 Nos. 23-935(L), 23-1004(XAP) BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. NORTH AMERICAN CONCERT PROMOT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTIAN W. SANDVIG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 16-1368 (JDB) JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION It’s a dangerous business, reading the fine print. Nearly

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge It's a dangerous business, reading the fine print. Nearly every website we visit features Terms of Service ("ToS"), those *8endless lists of dos and don'ts conjured up by lawyers to govern our conduct in cyberspace. They normally remain a perpetual click away at the bottom of every web page, or quickly scro

DECISION NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.149 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.152 ' I. BACKGROUND .152 A. Overview of the GPCC Card Industry.152 B. Competition and Pricing in the GPCC Card Industry.156 C. The Non-Discrimination Provisio

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This case, before the court after trial, arises from the failure of individual and corporate taxpayers to report one consistent value for almost 10 million shares of restricted stock issued in February 2000 to plaintiffs-counterdefendants David S. Litman and Malia A. Litman (collectively, the “Litmans”) and Robert B. Diener and Michelle S. Diener

*395 LEVAL, Circuit Judge. Defendant, Verio, Inc. (“Verio”) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Barbara S. Jones, J.) granting the motion of plaintiff Register.com, Inc. (“Register”) for a preliminary injunction. The court’s order enjoined Verio

*1061ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ • MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On January 17, 2014, Ben Z. Halberstam filed this putative class action on his own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated Californians against NJOY, Inc., and -Sottera, Inc. (collectively, “NJOY”).1

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [79] AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [74] STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”) consists of twenty-two class actions from across the country against Defendant Clear Channel Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries.1 The