Cases

\ *(“U g w 6'02103 1 ` v " las qu‘,' “w _ . _ ©§§§§§MNHW§§LS wR-41,625-0`3 JUN 08 2015 TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 1 4£@@%&@@§@,©1@?9< Ex parte In the 204 Judicial Lamont Earl Epinger g District Court 4 Dallas County, Texas Re: W93-31914-Q(B) APPLICANT'S OBJECTION TO THE STATE'S ORDER To the Honorable Judge of said court: Now comes Applicant Lamont Earl Epinger pro se, by way of objection to the State's order finding no controverted, previously, unrelolved factual issues requiring a

' _ . \ ' U\,Lg LQ§ 02 03 ' * §§§§%Y§§YMS 'w_R-41,625-03 JUN 08 2015 TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS _ 1 , AF@@%A@@SH,©H@W< Ex parte In the 204 Judicial Lamont Earl Epinger ' District Court v Dallas County, Texas Re: W93-3l914-Q(B) APPLICANT'S OBJECTION TO THE STATE'S ORDER To the Honorable Judge of said court: Now comes Applicant Lamont Earl Epinger pro se, by way of objection to the State's order finding no controverted, previously, unrelolved factual issues requiring a hearing for the

42 S.W.3d 143 (2000) Christopher Lamont JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 07-98-0411-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. August 22, 2000. *145 Earl Griffin, Jr., Childress, for appellant. Randall Sims, Dist. Atty., Wellington, for appellee. Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. PH

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION April 20, 2023 Plaintiff-Appellee,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 14, 2010 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. FREDERICK LAMONT MOORE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 09-77 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge No. W2009-01266-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 9, 2011 Following a jury trial, the Defendant, Frederick Lamont Moore, was convicted of first degree premed

637 F.3d 503 (2011) Tim BROCKINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antwan Lamont BOYKINS, Defendant-Appellant, and Baltimore Police Department, Defendant. No. 09-2308. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: December 7, 2010. Decided: March 22, 2011. *504 ARGUED: Barron Stroud, Jr., Stroud & Prie

PER CURIAM. Dontez Lamont Simuel appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Simuel v. Curry, No. CA-02-636-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 21, 2002, entered Oct. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because t

579 F.3d 411 (2009) In The Matter of: SEAQUEST DIVING, LP; SeaQuest General Holdings, LLC, Debtors. SeaQuest Diving, LP; SeaQuest General Holdings, LLC; Ryan Marine Services, Inc.; Emmons & Jackson, P.C., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. S&J Diving, Inc.; Stanley Earle Jones, Defendants-Appellants. No. 08-20516. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 12, 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 274A18 Filed 16 August 2019 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DUVAL LAMONT BOWMAN Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 818 S.E.2d 718 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018), vacating a judgment entered on 27 July 2016 by Judge Richard S. Gottlieb in Superior Court, Forsyth County, and remanding for a new t

396 S.E.2d 309 (1990) 327 N.C. 439 STATE of North Carolina v. William Quentin JONES. No. 570A87. Supreme Court of North Carolina. October 3, 1990. *310 Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Isaac T. Avery, III, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. and Linda Anne Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State. J. Rand

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 505PA20 Filed 6 April 2023 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RAYQUAN JAMAL BORUM On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, No. COA19-1022, 2020 WL 6437413 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2020), vacating a judgment entered on 8 March 2019 by Judge Gregory R. Hayes in Superior Court, Meckle

247 P.3d 582 (2010) STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross Appellant, v. Dale Carter SHACKELFORD, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Respondent. Nos. 27966, 31928. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, August 2009 Term. June 1, 2010. *588 Griffard Law Offices, Boise, for appellant. Leo N. Griffard, Jr., argued. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden

OPINION OF THE COURT (September 12, 2014) Greenaway, Circuit Judge Earl Vanterpool was prosecuted and convicted under V.I. CODE Ann. tit. 14, § 706(1) (“Section 706”) for obsessive phone calls and faxes to his ex-girlfriend, Jacqueline Webster. On appeal, we are asked to consider three issues: (1) whether Section 706

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge AGEE and Judge DAVIS joined. Judge DAVIS wrote a separate concurring opinion. DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: After the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole in October 2000, fifty-nine family members of the victims (the “plaintiffs”) filed suit against the Republic of Sudan (“Sudan”) in 2004. In 2007, the district court found Sudan li

Filed 3/20/23 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- THE PEOPLE, C094813 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super

Filed 2/23/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- THE PEOPLE, C094813 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CR115729) v. DWAYNE LAMONT BURGESS

HENDRY, Chief Judge. The defendants were tried on a two count information charging them in count one with conspiracy and in count two with grand larceny. At the conclusion of the state’s case the grand larceny charge was reduced to attempted larceny. Prior to submission of the case to the jury, the defendants moved that the state be required to elect as to which count it would rely upon for conviction. The motion was denied and

DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be licensed to practice law in Indiana or to file an exemption affidavit as contemplated by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2, and/or have failed to make the IOLTA certification required by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2(f). In additi

627 S.E.2d 287 (2006) STATE of North Carolina v. Delwood Earl SHELLY. No. COA05-713. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 21, 2006. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Daniel P. O'Brien, for the State. Appellate Defender Staples Hughes, by Assistant Appellate Defender Constance E. Widenhouse, for Defendant-Appellant.