Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC. v. ALVAREZ”
FILED Jun 10 2020, 11:02 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and
Andryeyeva v. New York Health Care, Inc.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Carolyn E. Demarest, J. In this putative class action by plaintiffs Lilya Andryeyeva and Marina Odrus, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively plaintiffs), plaintiffs bring this renewed motion pursuant to CPLR 901 and 902 to certify this case as a class action “consisting of a class of home attendants who worked 24-hour shifts for defendants” New York He
Valencia-Alvarez v. Gonzalespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL VALENCIA-ALVAREZ, Petitioner, No. 05-70275 v. Agency No. A42-909-915 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of a
American Civil Liberties Union of Ill. v. Alvarezpublic domain
SYKES, Circuit Judge. The Illinois eavesdropping statute makes it a felony to audio record “all or any part of any conversation” unless all parties to the conversation give their consent. 720 III. Comp. Stat. 5/14 — 2(a)(1). The statute covers any oral communication regardless of whether the communication was intended to be private. Id. 5/14 — 1(d). The offense is normally a class 4 felony but is elevated to a class 1
Sidibe v. Sutter Healthpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS [Re: ECF Nos. 40 & 41] LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, Plaintiffs Djeneba Sidibe and Diane Dewey sued Sutter Health, a company that owns and operates hospitals and other health care service providers, alleging that Sutter’s anticompetitive conduct in the health care servic
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge. Petitioner, Daniel Valencia-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks relief from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ determinations that he was removable for having been convicted of a controlled substance offense and that he was ineligible for cancellation of removal because his continuous presence in the United States “stopped” at the time he com
Whitfield v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-559V Filed: May 17, 2021 Reissued for Publication: June 15, 20211 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * MIKAYLA WHITFIELD, * Petitioner, * * v.
Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Hornpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Robert Lane v. Odle, Inc.public domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00024-CV ___________________________ ROBERT LANE, Appellant V. ODLE, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 442nd District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 22-8611-442 Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack
Dyer v. Amchem Prods. Inc.public domain
Dyer v Amchem Prods. Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 04609) Dyer v Amchem Prods. Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 04609 Decided on July 19, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431
Dyer v. Amchem Prods. Inc.public domain
Dyer v Amchem Prods. Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 04609) Dyer v Amchem Prods. Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 04609 Decided on July 19, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 677 HEALTH ) SERVICES & INSURANCE PLAN, ) individually and on behalf of all others ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-1075-NAC ) FRANK D. MARTELL,
Kaufman v. P&G Brokerage Inc.public domain
Kaufman v P&G Brokerage Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 24022) [*1] Kaufman v P&G Brokerage Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 24022 Decided on January 28, 2024 Supreme Court, Kings County Maslow, J. Published by New York
Kaufman v. P&G Brokerage Inc.public domain
Kaufman v P&G Brokerage Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 24022) [*1] Kaufman v P&G Brokerage Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 24022 Decided on January 28, 2024 Supreme Court, Kings County Maslow, J. Published by New York
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 677 HEALTH ) SERVICES & INSURANCE PLAN, ) individually and on behalf of all others ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-1075-NAC
d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic, et al. v. Wrigleypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 199 Access Independent Health Services, Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic, on behalf of itself and its patients; Kathryn L. Eggleston M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients; Ana Tobiasz, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients; Erica Hofland, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients; Collette Lessard, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients,
Cockayne v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.public domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1453C (Filed under seal June 18, 2025) (Reissued June 27, 2025) † * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * STARSIDE SECURITY & * INVESTIGATION, INC., * * Plaintiff, *
Amos v. Mobile County Health Departmentpublic domain
767 F.Supp.2d 1257 (2011) Angela F. AMOS, Plaintiff, v. MOBILE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-00817-CB-M. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. February 7, 2011. *1259 Gregory O'Dell Wiggins, Kevin W. Jent, Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff
Lewis v. Simplified Labor Staffing Solutions, Inc.public domain
Filed 12/5/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT SYLVESTER LEWIS, B312871 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV26893) v. SIMPLIFIED LABOR STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC. et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from an or