⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “ERHARD MATTHEW ROSS”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982-03-24 · Published · cited 4× · 680 F.2d 66; 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20732
680 F.2d 66 1982-2 Trade Cases 64,812 Vernon S. BODDICKER, Richard W. Peay, Hugh L. Thompson, andDwight G. Hudson, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ARIZONA STATE DENTAL ASSOCIATION, an Arizona Non-ProfitCorporation; Central Arizona Dental Society, an ArizonaNon-Profit Corporation; and American Dental Association, anIllinois Non-Profit Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 80-5
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 NY Slip Op 05388
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2021 NY Slip Op 05388) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law  468-a
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982-03-24 · Published · cited 0× · 680 F.2d 66
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Appellants, plaintiffs below, challenged the membership links between the defendant organizations on antitrust grounds. Trial was to the court, and after appellants had presented their case, the court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) and entered judgment against appellants. We affirm. (I) The district court rejected appellants’ contention that th
Lewis v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910-03-02 · Published · cited 23× · 127 S.W. 806; 58 Tex. Crim. 351; 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 131
Appellant was indicted in the District Court of Hill County on the 8th day of November of last year, charged with the sale of intoxicating liquors in said county in violation of law on the 25th day of October preceding to one Lee White. At a trial had in said court on the 13th day of December he was convicted, as charged, *Page 354 and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year. Almost the single question pr
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Stewart v. Robinsonpublic domain
New York Supreme Court · 1888-05-15 · Published · cited 1× · 21 Abb. N. Cas. 63
Barnard, P. J. The case shows that there were two .agreements of partnership between Joseph Colwell, deceased, and Samuel S. Hepworth. By the 'first agreement Colwell owned the stock and Hepworth received half the profits for the sole management of the business. In the agreement it was provided that the wife and children of a deceased partner should succeed to his share therein for the remainder of the term, which was for five ye