Cases

496 S.W.2d 652 (1973) VAHLSING, INC., Appellant, v. ESCO, LTD, et al., Appellees. No. 747. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. June 14, 1973. Rehearing Denied June 28, 1973. *653 Kelley, Looney, Alexander & Hiester, Ralph Alexander, John F. Rowin, Edinburg, for appellant. Adams, Graham, Le

52 F.Supp.2d 804 (1999) James P. SUMMERVILLE, Plaintiff, v. ESCO COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant. No. 1:98-CV-412. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 12, 1999. *805 *806 Nelson P. Miller, Fajen & Miller, Grand Haven, for James P. Summerville, pltfs.<

ORDER SARA DARROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case involves patent infringement claims by Plaintiffs ESCO Corporation (“ESCO Corp.”) and ESCO Canada, Ltd. (“ESCO Canada”) against Defendants Caterpillar Inc. and Caterpillar Global Mining, LLC (“Caterpillar Global”), Raptor Mining Products (USA) Inc. (“Raptor USA”) and Raptor Mining Products, Inc. (“Raptor Mining”), and Cashman Equipment C

928 F.Supp. 252 (1996) ESCO FASTENERS, CO., INC. and Calley and Currier Co., Inc., Plaintiffs, v. KOREA HINOMOTO CO., LTD., Defendant. No. CV-95-4818. United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 12, 1996. *253 Steven T. Lane, Ready & Pontisakos, Garden City, New York, for plaintiffs. Joseph L. Clasen, Robinson &a;

169 Ill. App.3d 376 (1988) 523 N.E.2d 589 ESCO CORPORATION, Appellant, v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al. (James Bullias, Appellee). No. 4-87-0394WC. Illinois Appellate Court — Fourth District (Industrial Commission Division). Opinion filed April 28, 1988. *377 *378 Jo

ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, United States District Judge This case arises from Defendants’ alleged infringement of multiple patents held by Plaintiffs that relate to wear members used on excavating and mining equipment. In response, Defendants have filed counter infringement claims based on patents owned by Defendants Caterpillar, Inc. (“CAT”) and Caterpillar Global Mining (“CGM”), as well as counterclaims for

ORDER & OPINION JOE BILLY McDADE, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Transfer of Venue, filed November 21, 2012. (Doc. 60). Plaintiff has responded in opposition, and the Motion is now ready for disposition. For the reasons stated below, the Motion to Transfer is granted. Plaintiff has also filed a Motion for Status Conferenc

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. hAn on-the-job injury occurred on August 24, 2007, while Plaintiff, Ms. Davita Smith, was employed by the Defendant, Academy Sports and Outdoors (“Academy”) in Lafayette, Louisiana. Ms. Smith appeals a trial court judgment denying her additional workers’ compensation benefits for that accident. Based on stipulations in the record, the primary issues on appeal are whether Ms. Smith is entitled to ongo

WICKER, J. Lin this appeal, Semco, L.L.C. and The Grand Ltd. seek review of the trial judgment, rendered following a nearly three-week jury trial, awarding $4,831,144.00 in favor of Semco and $680,845.00 in favor of The Grand for damages arising out of the construction of a multi-million dollar lift-boat. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment but amend the judgment to award judicial interest from th

Judge Regina Bartholomew-Woods |! Plaintiff-Appellant, Erroll G. Williams, Assessor for the Parish of Orleans (“Assessor Williams” or “the Assessor”), appeals the judgment of the Orleans Parish Civil District Court dated July 11, 2016, in favor of Defendants-Appellants, Opportunity Homes Limited Partnerships (“Opportunity Homes”) and the Louisiana Tax Commission (the “LTC” or “the Commission”). Assessor Williams asserts four

78 So.3d 146 (2011) CHEF MENTEUR LAND COMPANY, LTD. v. Gary SANDROCK, et al. No. 2011-CA-0497. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. October 19, 2011. *147 Robert A. Barnett, Guste Barnett Schlesinger Henderson & Alpaugh, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Ian E. Goldenberg, Ian E. Goldenberg, L.L

PETERS, J. hThe defendant, Industrial Chemicals (US) Limited, appeals a trial court judgment awarding the plaintiff, Robert Por-beck, damages, penalties, and attorney fees based on the terms of an employment contract entered into by the parties. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s award of severance pay and insurance benefits to Mr. Porbeck, but reverse the award of penalties and attorney fees and render jud

*1053TRIAL ON THE MERITS Fiduciary Duty In its first assignment of error, Amitech contends that the trial court erred in finding that Nottingham owed it no fiduciary duty. Amitech asserts that the dealings between it and Nottingham prior to the execution of the February 26, 2002 Design-Build Contract created a fiduciary relationship; which N

985 So.2d 832 (2008) CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. BADINE LAND LIMITED. North Peters Development, L.L.C. v. City of New Orleans. North Peters Development, L.L.C. v. City of New Orleans. Nos. 2007-CA-1066, 2007-CA-1067, 2007-CA-1068. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. May 21, 2008. *833 Penya M. Moses-F

bCANNELLA, Judge. Defendants, Allen Ritchey (Ritchey) and Ritchey & LeDoux Partnership, appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff, Calais Square, Ltd. (Calais), ordering that a previous judgment rendered in favor of defendants against plaintiff be canceled and erased from the public records. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. In December of 1989, Ritchey & LeDoux Partnership su

997 So.2d 796 (2008) INDEST-GUIDRY, LTD., et al. v. KEY OFFICE EQUIPMENT, INC., et al. No. 08-599. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. November 5, 2008. *798 Stacy Butler, Kizer, Hood & Morgan, L.L.P., Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendants/Appellants-Key Office Equipment, Inc. and Kenny Gregory. Randy M. Guidry, Dur

NO NO. 12-09-00287-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

NO. 12-09-00287-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS TEXAS ELECTRIC UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, LTD., ' APPEAL FROM THE 145TH APPELLANT V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF INFRASOURCE UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION ' NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS SERVICES, L.L.C., APPE

h STEWART, J. Great American Real Food Fast, Inc. (“Great American”) appeals the trial court’s grant of Night and Day Partners, Ltd.’s (“Night and Day”) eviction action. Finding that the trial court erred as a matter of law we reverse and remand for the reasons expressed herein. FACTS The subject property of this dispute was sold by Cal Staggers (“Staggers”) to Night and Day by cash sa

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THE COURT, having received and reviewed the Motion for a Temporary *1347Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff (collectively, the “Motions”), the affidavit and documents attached thereto, Defendants’ Response and Plaintiffs Reply, and ha