Cases

DAVID T. LEWIS, Circuit Judge. Appellant, a former Justice of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, was found guilty by a jury verdict on all five counts of an indictment charging him with wil-fully and knowingly attempting to evade income taxes for the years 1957 through 1961 in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 and was sentenced to concurren

Otis, Justice. This appeal arises out of an action brought by State Bank of St. Anthony Village against United Bonding Insurance Company to recover money loaned by the bank to Earl Welch Excavating Company, Inc. Liability is predicated on a finding that John-Dee, Inc., was acting as the bonding company’s agent in entering an *267agreement to give the bank priority in

Roderick Earl Jackson appeals his convictions for one count of trafficking in cocaine while possessing a firearm, a violation of §13A-12-231(2) and (13), Ala. Code 1975, one count of trafficking in marijuana while possessing a firearm, *Page 2 a violation of § 13A-12-231(1) and (13), Ala. Code 1975, one count of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, a violation of §

WIDENER, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the result reached in the opinion of Judge Beezer, which is the decision of the court. I concur in all of the opinion of Judge Beezer except the first paragraph of Part III A. 1. of the opinion which is found on page 8 of the circulated slip opinion, and the penultimate sentence of the text of the opinion found in Part VI thereof on page 22 o

PITTMAN, Judge. Nina Wagnon, Laura Powell, and James Earl Welch, Jr. (“James Earl Jr.”) (Nina, Laura, and James Earl Jr. are hereinafter referred to collectively as “the heirs”), appeal from separate judgments of the Shelby Circuit Court (“the trial court”) in favor of Jo Ann Gravelle, which dismissed the heirs’ action against Jo Ann and denied the heirs’ motion to set aside or vacate an award to Jo Ann of attorney fees under the

880 S.W.2d 225 (1994) Donald WELCH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 3-93-510-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. July 6, 1994. *226 Vickie Prehoditch, Austin, for appellant. Ronald Earle, Dist. Atty., Lisa Dotin Stewart, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin, for appellee. Before CARROLL, C.J., and KIDD and B

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ellison, J.), entered November 23, 1994 in Chemung County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services denying petitioner’s request to participate in a family reunion program. Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this proceeding challenging an administrative determination m

MARVIN, Judge. The divorced husband-father appeals a judgment rejecting his demands to disavow the paternity of a child born to the mother during the existence of the marriage. Plaintiff contends that he met the burden of CC Arts. 184, 187 and proved by a preponderance of the evidence facts that overcome the presumption of paternity.1 The marriage occurred June 10, 1977.

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 21-P-916 Appeals Court COMMONWEALTH

Second degree murder; sentence: ten years imprisonment. The evidence shows that the deceased, Adam McCants, had an argument with his mother-in-law who lived with him and his wife. The mother-in-law called her son, the appellant, to come and move her out of the apartment. When he arrived, he had words with the deceased and then began taking his mother's belongings out to his car. The remainder of the evidence is in dispute. The State introduced testimony that on arriving

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SIMKINS delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant was convicted of the crime of involuntary manslaughter of Florine Cox, also known as Florine Welch, in violation of section 9. — 3 of the Criminal Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 9 — 3). Defendant received a sentence of 3 to 9 years.- The Illinois Defender Proje

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2024-0196 Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CF-006891-O _____________________________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. JAMES EA

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan January 22, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

BY THE PANEL: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 (h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Frank James Welch, Jr., proceeding pro se , has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra

Appeal from Chancery Court, Pontotoc County; George F. Adams, Chancellor. Before WALKER, P.J., and ROY NOBLE LEE and HAWKINS, JJ. AFFIRMED.

Willie Earl Scott appealed the circuit court's summary dismissal of his petition for postconviction relief filed *Page 2 pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P. Scott's petition challenged his convictions for two counts of capital murder and his resulting sentence of death and his convictions for first-degree rape, attempted murder, and first-degree burglary and his resulting sentences of life imprisonment for each of those convictions. This Court a

Note from the reporter of decisions: On July 27, 2005, James Earl Andrews filed a Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim.P., petition alleging that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea to second-degree rape, in part because the Montgomery Circuit Court did not sentence him according to a plea agreement he had entered into with the prosecution. The circuit court dismissed Andrews’s petition, and he appealed. On March 18, 2011, the Court of Criminal Appeals iss

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiff in this case, John Welch, alleged that his employer, the Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”), discriminated against him on the basis of his disability, and also retaliated against him for complaining about that discrimination. Based on these allegations, the Plaintiff asserted (1) federal claims under the Americans with Disabi

WELCH, J. Claimant/Appellant, William Earl Harrison, appeals from a grant of partial summary judgment by the Office of Workers' Compensation ("OWC") in favor of Plant *3Performance Services, L.L.C., and its workers' compensation insurer, CNA, (collectively, "P2S"), forfeiting his right to workers' compensation benefits under La. R.S. 23:1208, based