Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “East Benning Corporation”
PHIPPS, Presiding Judge. This appeal from two summary judgment orders is the third appearance of this case before this court. 1 In American Management I, the court stated the facts as follows. Appellees Fort Benning Family Communities, LLC (“FBFC”) and Fort Belvoir Res
BLACKWELL, Judge, dissenting. Based on a finding that this case and the Virginia lawsuit present “[t]he same issues,” the court below enjoined Pinnacle3 from continuing to prosecute any aspect of the Virginia lawsuit. That, I think, was an abuse of discretion because, although the two lawsuits may present some of the same issues, not all the issues are the same, and the court below
*615 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, District Judge. SMS Assist L.L.C. (“SMS”) is a company that provides maintenance services to corporate clients by contracting with, and supervising, third parties who perform those services. In October 2008, Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (“Family Dollar”) hired SMS to manage snow removal
KEITH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff/Appellant Pension Benefit Guaranty, Corp. (“PBGC”) appeals the district court’s judgment finding the Defendants/Ap-pellees East Dayton Tool and Die Co., Inc. (“East Dayton”), et al., did not control East Dayton’s pension plan on its termination date and therefore, were not liable for the pension plan’s unfunded benefit liabilities, and its subse
Terwilliger v. Beazer East, Inc.public domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Chimes, J.), dated March 7, 2016. The order denied *1618 the motion of defendant Honeywell International, Inc., successor in interest to the Wilputte Coke Oven Division of Allied Chemical Corporation, for summary judgmen
East Valley Water v. Water Resources Commissionpublic domain
148 August 7, 2025 No. 34 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of Water Right Application R-87871 in the Name of EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION, Oregon Water Resources Department, and WATERWATCH O
East Valley Water v. Water Resources Commissionpublic domain
148 August 7, 2025 No. 34 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of Water Right Application R-87871 in the Name of EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION, Oregon Water Resources Department, and WATERWATCH OF OREGON, INC.,
300 East 64th Street Partners, LLC v. Boissevainpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Sabrina B. Kraus, J. Background This summary holdover proceeding was commenced by 300 East 64th Street Partners, LLC against Ben Boissevain, the tenant of record of 300 East 64th Street, apartment 22-D, New York, New York 10065, based on the allegations that respondent is a month to month tenant and that his tenancy was terminated by a 30-day notice dated November 25,
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA, PURSUANT TO O.C.G.A. § 15-2-9. TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA AND ITS HONORABLE JUSTICES: This action in diversity presents unanswered questions of Georgia law that are determinative of this appeal. We therefore certify these questions to the highest cou
Justice RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. East Twin Lakes Ditches and Water Works, Inc., ("ETLD") appeals the water court's holding that the water right in the Derry Ditch No. 1, owned by the Lake County Board of County Commissioners ("Lake County"), was not abandoned. ETLD contends that (1) the water right was abandoned due to non-use for approximately thirty years; and (2) the decision by the predece
East Valley Water v. Water Resources Commissionpublic domain
790 November 1, 2023 No. 567 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of Water Right Application R-87871 in the Name of EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. OREGON WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION, OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, and WATERWATCH OF OREGON, INC., Respondents,
East Valley Water v. Water Resources Commissionpublic domain
790 Argued and submitted November 3, 2022, affirmed November 1, 2023. In the Matter of Water Right Application R-87871 in the Name of EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. OREGON WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION, OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, and WATERWATCH OF OREGON, INC., Respondents,
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-2696 & 24-2813 EAST GATE-LOGISTICS PARK CHICAGO, LLC, and NORTHPOINT DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST; CENTERPOINT JOLIET TERMINAL RAILROAD, LLC; and HOUBOLT ROAD EXTENSION JV, LLC, Defendants-Appellee
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-2696 & 24-2813 EAST GATE-LOGISTICS PARK CHICAGO, LLC, and NORTHPOINT DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES TRUST; CENTERPOINT JOLIET TERMINAL RAILROAD, LLC; and HOUBOLT ROAD EXTENSION JV, LLC, Defendants-Appellee
Carlino East Brandywine v. Brandywine Villagepublic domain
J-A06024-20 2021 PA Super 147 CARLINO EAST BRANDYWINE, L.P. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. BRANDYWINE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, JOHN R. CROPPER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GENERAL PARTNER OF BRANDYWINE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, L & R PARTNERSHIP, RICHARD J. BLAIR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GENERAL PARTNER OF
TERWILLIGER, DONALD J. v. BEAZER EAST, INC.public domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 85 CA 16-00947 PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION. ----------------------------------------------- DONALD J. TERWILLIGER, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD R. TERWILLIGER, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BEAZER EAST
Rhodes v. East 81st, LLCpublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered on or about June 24, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the respective motions by defendant Capital Construction Management of New York, LLC (Capital) and defendants East 81st, LLC and Ben Zion Suky (the East 81st defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the common-law negligence and Labor Law § 200 claims as against them and denied the part of t
Newstone Development, LLC v. East Pacific, LLCpublic domain
OPINION Chief Justice SUTTELL, for the Court. This case arises from an incident involving a frozen water pipe and its diluvial aftermath, which caused extensive property damage to several Newport waterfront luxury condominium units. The plaintiff, Newstone Development, LLC (Newstone), owned several units in the condominium complex at
MacFarlane v. Town of East Bridgewaterpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON EAST BRIDGEWATER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case arises out of an incident that occurred on October 20, 2013, when John R. Grillo, a detective in the East Bridge-water police department, went to the home of the plaintiffs, John C. MacFarlane and Amy MacFarlane, in order
Brock, Gregory v. Dollar General Corporationpublic domain
FILED Nov 29, 2022 01:58 PM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION