Cases

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY WYKEEMA GRIFFIN, Appellant/Plaintiff-Below, Case No. CPU4-20-000793 V. EDGAR RAMIREZ d/b/a LATINOS AUTO REPAIR, 444 a a ad Appellee/Defendant-Below. Submitted: October 26, 2020 Decided: November 18, 2020 Wykeema Griffin Edgar Ramirez 220 City View Ave. 3310 Wrangle Hill Road Wilmington, DE 19802 Suite 104 Pro Se Appellant Bear, DE 19701 Pro Se Appellee ORDER Pro se Appellant, Wykeema Griffin, brings this

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII EDGAR FRANCISCO Apelación MORALES RAMÍREZ procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelante Instancia, Sala KLAN202500242 Superior de San v

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI CONSEJO DE TITULARES APELACIÓN, DEL CONDOMINIO FIRST acogido como FEDERAL SAVINGS Certiorari, Procedente del Recurrido Tribunal de

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI CONSEJO DE TITULARES APELACIÓN, DEL CONDOMINIO FIRST acogido como FEDERAL SAVINGS Certiorari, Procedente del Apelada Tribunal de KLAN202301011 Primera v.

Opinion issued January 31, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/02/2023 09:07 AM CDT - 419 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 314 Nebraska Reports STATE V. RAMIREZ Cite as 314 Neb. 419 State of Nebraska, app

GANTS, C.J. **331 We once again confront the question whether the absolute criminal prohibition of civilian possession of a stun gun, in violation of G. L. c. 140, § 131J, violates the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which is applied to the States by its incorporation int

PD-1352-15 PD-1352-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 10/16/2015 3:51:31 PM Accepted 10/16/2015 4:10:38 PM

PD-1352-15 _____________________________________________________ IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS _____________________________________________________ EDGAR JAVIER GONZALES Appellant-Petitioner vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee-Respondent ________________________

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1568 TIMOTHY H. EDGAR; RICHARD H. IMMERMAN; MELVIN A. GOODMAN; ANURADHA BHAGWATI; MARK FALLON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. AVRIL D. HAINES, in her official capacity as Director of National Intelligence; DAVID COHEN, in his official

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § THE STATE OF TEXAS, No. 08-16-00089-CR § Appellant, Appeal from § v.

2023 IL App (3d) 210058 Opinion filed June 21, 2023 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2023 EDGAR COUNTY WATCHDOGS,

2022 IL App (3d) 210058 Opinion filed November 30, 2022 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2022 EDGAR COUNTY WATCHDOGS,

68 F.3d 484 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. UNI

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-19-00208-CR LETICIA NOHELY RAMIREZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 76th District Court Camp County, Texas Trial Court No. CF-17-01806 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

BEALES, Judge. Edgar Edmundo Moreno (appellant) appeals his conviction by a jury for uttering a forged public record in violation of Code § 18.2-168. Appellant argues that the circuit court erred in finding that a purported accord and satisfaction agreement, which appellant presented as genuine to the Loudoun County General District Court in an earlier matter, was a public record,

ACCEPTED 13-14-00675-CR THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 11/9/2015 9:52:26 AM

Nebraska Advance Sheets 356 287 NEBRASKA REPORTS without merit under either alternative formulation, his coun- sel was not ineffective in not asserting it at sentencing or on direct appeal. CONCLUSION To summarize, in my view, the rule announced in Miller is procedural and does not apply to Mantich on collateral review. I would find that Graham has no application to Mantich’s sentence of life imprisonment for first degree felony murder, a homicide, and that Ma

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WYKEEMA GRIFFIN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N20A-12-006 CEB ) EDGAR RAMIREZ, d/b/a ) LATINO’S AUTO REPAIR, ) ) Appellee. )

49 S.W.3d 561 (2001) John E. LEWIS, Appellant, v. Ruben RAMIREZ, Appellee. No. 13-00-107-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. June 7, 2001. *562 Michael Lee Young, McAllen, for Appellant. Ruben Ramirez, Law Office of Ruben Ramirez, McAllen, for Appellee. Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices RODRIGUEZ a