Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Edgett v. Union Pacific Railroad Company”
Hurston v. Grand Trunk W. RR. Co.public domain
[Cite as Hurston v. Grand Trunk W. RR. Co., 2024-Ohio-1616.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Barbara Ann Hurston, Personal Court of Appeals No. L-23-1059 Representative of the Estate of Douglas Hurston, Sr., Deceased Trial Court No. CI0202201125 Appellant v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
Nuckols v. Consolidated Rail Corp.public domain
[Cite as Nuckols v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 2022-Ohio-4309.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY RANDY NUCKOLS COURT OF APPEALS NO. {48}L-21-1217 APPELLANT TRIAL COURT NO. CI0201902279 V. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. APPELLEES
Molitor v. BNSF Ry. Co.public domain
2022 IL App (1st) 211486 No. 1-21-1486 Opinion filed December 20, 2022 SECOND DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILL
Ledger v. Tippittpublic domain
Opinion McMAHON, J.* The first cause of action for wrongful death was brought on behalf of Richard Arters III, the son of Richard Arters II. The second and third causes of action for loss of consortium and negligent infliction of mental distress, were brought by Jennifer Ledger, who enjoyed a “stable and significant” nonmarital relationship with Richard Arters II, the decedent. The
MacPherson v. Boston Edison Co.public domain
336 Mass. 94 (1957) 142 N.E.2d 758 JOHN A. MacPHERSON vs. BOSTON EDISON COMPANY & others. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. December 4, 1956. May 14, 1957. Present: WILKINS, C.J., RONAN, SPALDING, WILLIAMS, COUNIHAN, WHITTEMORE, & CUTTER, JJ. Harry J. Williams, (Ruth M. deBellis with him,) for the
Roddiscraft, Inc. v. Skelton Logging Co.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 786 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 787 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT