Cases

844 P.2d 229 (1992) 117 Or. App. 307 In the Matter of the Estate of Anna E. Holst, aka Effie Holst, Deceased. Leland HOLST, Personal Representative of the Estate of Anna E. Holst, Trustee of the Testamentary Trust Established Under the Will of Anna E. Holst Estate, and Trustee of the Intervivos Trust Established by Anna E. Holst as the Settlor, Respondent, v. Dwight G. PURDY, Conservator for Aubrey Ray Holst, Appellant

LANDAU, J. Employer petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board reversing the referee’s dismissal of claimant’s request for a hearing on a determination order. We affirm. In 1984, claimant compensably injured her back while working for employer. Her claim was closed in December, 1985. Her claim was reopened when she began receiving treatment for an adjustment and somatization disorder

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. *Page 667

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., WERNER, HISCOCK, CHASE, HOGAN, MILLER and CARDOZO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Appellee’s amended motion to dismiss is granted. This appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. RAY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

PER CURIAM. *799Appellees' amended motion to dismiss is granted. This appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. RAY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

PER CURIAM. Appellees’ amended motion to dismiss is granted. This appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. RAY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

15 P.3d 67 (2000) 171 Or. App. 289 Evelyn E. SMITH, Appellant, v. Caryl Jayne ELLISON, Respondent. (16-98-01055; CA A105661) Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted January 27, 2000. Decided December 6, 2000. *68 G. David Jewett, Springfield, argued the cause for appellant. With h

EDMONDS, P. J. This case involves challenges by petitioners Home Builders Association of Lane County and Home Builders Construction Company to the legality of the methodology for imposing system development charges (SDCs) adopted pursuant to ORS chapter 223. The methodology in issue was formulated by the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC) and formally adopted through resolutions by the City of Springfield and

991 P.2d 1083 (1999) 164 Or. App. 309 James WATSON, Respondent, v. Stan L. MILLER and Shirley E. Miller, husband and wife, Appellants. Stan L. Miller and Shirley E. Miller, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. MM Site Development Corporation and Mel Tennyson, Third-Party Defendants. (95-0341-L-1; CA A100480) Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and S

920 P.2d 1148 (1996) 142 Or. App. 303 Bruce S. MORGAN, Respondent, v. David E. HART, Kevin Paige Hart, David A. Halladey and Barclays American Mortgage Corporation, Respondents. In the Matter of Way of Necessity, Bruce S. MORGAN, Respondent, v. Laurence E. THORP and M.M. Thorp, Al King and Denise King, Terry D. Thomas and Virginia L. Thomas, Elwood A. George, Robin L. Rutherford and P.M. Rutherford, Appellants.

BREWER, C. J. Petitioners Home Builders Association of Lane County and Home Builders Construction Company seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) order that dismissed for lack of jurisdiction their challenge to respondents’ adoption of a public wastewater treatment facility plan (the “public facilities plan” or “the plan”). We affirm. The public facilities plan was prepared by respondent Metropolit

ARMSTRONG, P. J. Defendants appeal from a declaratory judgment in favor of plaintiff1 and a supplemental judgment that awarded attorney fees to plaintiff. The declaratory judgment addressed the legal effect of an earlier judgment that defendants had obtained that foreclosed a construction lien against a parcel of real property owned by plaintiff. The court declared that the foreclosure judgment did n

*934AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. The plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand has been fully briefed and is pending for review. [MDL Record No. 1137] They argue that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear their products-liability claims because the parties are not completely di

802 P.2d 694 (1990) 104 Or.App. 629 Florence L. HILL, Appellant, v. Robert W. MAYERS and Lynn Mayers, Husband and Wife, and Adroit Construction Co., Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Respondents. 88-229-J-3; CA A60052. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted January 12, 1990. Decided December 12, 1990. Reconsideratio

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. This pharmaceutical multi-district litigation (“MDL”) action is pending for consideration of the plaintiffs’ motion for a suggestion of remand in the above-captioned cases. [MDL Record No. 3034] In each case, the plaintiffs argue that the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(11)(C)(1), entitles them to remand to the Uni

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ROBERT B. EVELEIGH, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO MARGARET M. EVELEIGH, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND and CARL B. EVELEIGH, as DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED named trustees of the William C. Eveleigh Family Trust, CASE NO. 1D16-5165 Appellants, v. WILLIAM C. EVELEIGH, Appellee.

794 P.2d 833 (1990) 102 Or.App. 336 Thomas E. MALOT and Sandra L. Malot, Respondents, v. Maynard HADLEY, Appellant. Glen F. Payne, Harold Ellis, Cal Wayne, Ed McGrew and Lloyd Tyler, Defendants. No. 844442-J-2; CA A51077. Court of Appeals of State of Oregon. Argued and Submitted January 12, 1990. Decided June 27, 1990.

EDMONDS, J., dissenting. The majority holds that the trial court had authority to enter a money judgment as a result of the support order under ORS 107.105(4) that served as a basis for a contempt judgment under ORCP 78 and ORS chapter 33 and remands for entry of a judgment. The majority is wrong. Husband originally was ordered to pay support under ORS 107.105(4). He was later found in contemp

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ROBERT B. EVELEIGH, as NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO Trustee of the William Carl FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Eveleigh Trust u/w Anna M. DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Eveleigh, MARGARET M. EVELEIGH and CARL B. CASE NO. 1D16-5167 EVELEIGH, as nominated successor trustees of the William Carl Eveleigh Trust u/w